Volume 11, Issue 29 (3-2019)
jcb 2019, 11(29): 202-213 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Espanani S, Majidi M M, Saedi G. (2019). Efficiency of Indirect Selection to Improve Yield and Drought Tolerance in Populations Derived from Inter-Specific Hybridization of Soft Flower. jcb. 11(29), 202-213. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.29.202
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-659-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-659-en.html
Isfahan University of Technology
Abstract: (2988 Views)
The use of appropriate selection methods are important to increase yield in breeding programs. Utilization of selection indices is one of the most effective method for selection of superior genotypes to improve the complex traits such as seed yield. In order to evaluate the efficiency of different selection methods, 63 families of two F3 populations derived from inter-specific hybridization of Carthamus tinctorius ×Carthamus oxyacanthus (IO) and Carthamus palaestinus × Carthamus tinctorius (IP) were evaluated under two moisture environments (normal and drought-stress) at the research farm of Isfahan University of Technology during 2016. The Smith-Hazel 1, Smith-Hazel 2 and Pesek-Baker indices were measured based on the traits entered in step-wise regression model. The results indicated that under normal conditions, Pesek-Baker index was more effective than the Smith-Hazel 1 and Smith-Hazel 2 and was also more efficient for the selection of superior genotypes in IP population. Also, the Smith-Hazel 1 and Smith-Hazel 2 indices were more effective than Pesek-Baker index under drought-stress conditions in this population. Smith-Hazel 1 and Smith-Hazel 2 indices were more effective than Pesek-Baker index in IO population at two moisture environments. Efficiency of selection in IP population was more than IO population, thereby it can be used to develop superior genotypes in breeding programs. Since the C. palaestinus have less undesirable characters compared to other wild parents, it may be suitable source for transferring desirable genes to the cultivated species.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2016/11/9 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2018/01/27 | Published: 2019/05/8
Received: 2016/11/9 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2018/01/27 | Published: 2019/05/8
References
1. Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, (FAO: Rome, Italy).
2. Baker, R.J. 1986. Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida. 218p.
3. Clegg, M.T. 1997. Plant genetic diversity and the struggle to measure selection. Journal of Heredity, 88 (1): 1-7. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023048]
4. Dolan, D.J., D.D. Stuthman, F.L. Kalb and A.D. Hewings. 1996. Multiple trait selection in a recurrent selection population in oat (Avena sativa L.). Crop Science, 36(5): 1207-1211. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050023x]
5. Eta-Ndu, J.T. and S.J. Openshaw. 1992. Selection criteria for grain yield and moisture in maize yield trials. Crop Science, 32(2): 332-335. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200020010x]
6. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group Ltd., London.
7. Gebre, H. and E. N. Later. 1996. Genetic response to index selection for grain yield, kernel weight and percent protein in four wheat crosses. Plant Breeding, 115(6): 459-464. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00957.x]
8. Grafius, J.E. 1964. A geometry of plant breeding. Crop Science, 4(3): 241-246. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400030001x]
9. Granate, M.J., C. Cosmedomia and A. Pattopacheco. 2002. Prediction of genetic gain with different selection indices in popcorn CMC-43. Revista Publication, 37(7): 1001-1008. [DOI:10.1590/S0100-204X2002000700014]
10. Hajjar, R. and T. Hodgkin. 2007. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: A survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica, 156 (1): 1-13. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0]
11. Hazel, L. 1943. The genetic basis for constructions selection indices. Genetics, 28(6): 476-490.
12. Johnson, S.K., D.B. Helsel and K.J. Frey. 1983. Direct and indirect selection for grain yield in oat (Avena sativa L.). Euphytica, 32(2): 407-413. [DOI:10.1007/BF00021449]
13. Kendell, B., D.C. Rasmusson and M. Galla-Meagher. 2000. Enhancing yield of semi dwarf barley. Crop Science, 40(2): 352-358. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2000.402352x]
14. Lin, C.Y. 1978. Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 52(2): 49-56. [DOI:10.1007/BF00281316]
15. Majidi, M.M., V. Tavakoli, A.F. Mirlohi and M.R. Sabzalian. 2011. Wild safflower species (Carthamus oxyacanthus Bieb.): A possible source of drought tolerance for arid environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(8): 1055-1063.
16. Majidi, M.M. and S. Zadhoush. 2014. Molecular and morphological variation in a world-wide collection of safflower. Crop Science, 54(5): 2109-2119. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2013.12.0850]
17. Mostafaie, F., A.F. Mirlohi, Gh. Saiedi, M.R. Sabzalian, P. Asgarinia and M. Gheisari. 2014. Evaluation of variation and drought tolerance in F3 generation of a cross between domesticated (Carthamus tinctorius L.) and wild (C. oxyacanthus L.) safflower species. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(3): 165-180 (In Persian).
18. Omidi Tabrizi, A.H. 2006. Stability and adaptability estimates of some safflower cultivars and lines in different environmental conditions. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology, 8(2):141-151.
19. Pesek, J. and R.J. Baker.1969. Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Canadian Journal Plant Science, 49(6): 803-804. [DOI:10.4141/cjps69-137]
20. Pritchard, A.J., D.E. Byth and R.A. Bray. 1973. Genetic variability and the application of selection indices for yield improvement in two soybean populations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 24(1): 81-89. [DOI:10.1071/AR9730081]
21. Rabinson, H.F., R.E. Comstock and P.H. Harvey. 1950. Genotypic and phenotypic correlation in corn and their implication in selection. Agronomy Journal, 10(1): 282-287. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300060007x]
22. Ranalli, P., G. Ruaro and P.D. Re. 1991. Response to selection for seed yield in bean (phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica, 57(2): 117-123 [DOI:10.1007/BF00023069]
23. Reyazul Rouf Mir, R.R., M. Zaman-Allah, N. Sreenivasulu, R. Trethowan and R.K. Varshney. 2012. Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops. Review. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 125(4): 625-645 [DOI:10.1007/s00122-012-1904-9]
24. Reynolds, M.P. and R. Ortiz. 2010. Adapting crops to climate change: a summary. In: M.P. Reynolds (ed.) Climate change and crop production, CAB international, 1-8 pp. [DOI:10.1079/9781845936334.0001]
25. Sabzalian, M.R., G. Saeidi, A. Mirlohi and B. Hatami. 2010. Wild safflower species (Carthamus oxyacanthus): a possible source of resistance to the safflower fly (Acanthiophilus helianthi). Crop Protection, 29(6): 550-555. [DOI:10.1016/j.cropro.2009.12.013]
26. Serraj, R., C.T. Hash and S.M.H. Rivzi. 2005. Recent advances in marker assisted selection for drought tolerance in pearl millet. Plant Production Science, 8(3): 334-337 [DOI:10.1626/pps.8.334]
27. Shiravand, R. and M.M. Majidi. 2013. Traits relationships in five species of carthamus under normal and dificit irrigation. Journals of Crop Production and Processing, 3(8): 149-163 (In Persian).
28. Singh, T. and H.S. Balyan. 2003. Relative efficiency of various single plant selection criteria and F3 generation yield testing in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal Genetics, 63(1): 24-29.
29. Smith, H.F. 1936. A discrimination function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenics, 7(3): 240-250 [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x]
30. Smith, O.S., A.R. Hallauer and W.A. Russel. 1981. Use of index selection in recurrent selection program in maize. Euphytica, 30(3): 611-618. [DOI:10.1007/BF00038788]
31. Toker, C., H. Canci and T. Yildirim. 2007. Evaluation of perennial wild cicer species for drought resistance. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54(8): 1781-1786. [DOI:10.1007/s10722-006-9197-y]
32. Young, S.S.Y. 1961. A further examination of the relative efficiency of three methods of selection for genetic gains under less restricted conditions. Genetics Research, 2(1): 106-121. [DOI:10.1017/S0016672300000598]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
