Volume 9, Issue 22 (9-2017)
J Crop Breed 2017, 9(22): 125-132 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
(2017). Study on Genotype × Environment Interactions for Grain Yield of Oats
Genotypes using AMMI Model
. J Crop Breed. 9(22), 125-132. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.22.125
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html
Abstract: (5546 Views)
In order to evaluate the grain yield stability of 21 oat genotypes, 13 experiments carried out during 6 years (from 2009 to 2015) and across 4 environments in the west of Iran. Five of them were carried out by the author of this thesis during 2013-2015 using a completely randomized block design with three replications under three conditions including irrigated, drought stress and rainfed at the Research Farm of the Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resurces, Razi University, Kermanshah. Based on the results of analysis of variance for grain yield, high significant differences were detected for genotype, environments and genotype × environment interaction. Significance interaction of genotype × environment showed that the response of genotypes to the environment were different. Significance of genotype × environment interaction allowed us to perform genotype × environment interaction analysis to find stable and high yielding genotypes across experiments. Accordingly, to investigate the interaction and identify stable genotypes, AMMI model was used. According to the numerical values of the components of the interaction of genotype and their ranks it can be concluded that genotypes 6, 8, 20, 12, 18, 21 and 1 have been greater yield stability than other genotypes and also according to Ammi stability value (ASV) genotypes respectively 20, 6, 8, 1, 21, 18, 9 and 3 were determined as stable genotypes. To take account of sustainability and yield AMMI1 charts were used simultaneously. In addition to the sustainability performance of stable genotypes, genotypes 21 and 6 had higher grain yield. Thus, we can figure this genotypes to introduce a new or used in breeding programs proposes.
References
1. Achleitner, A., N.A. Tinker, E. Zechner and H. Buerstmayr. 2008. Genetic diversity among oat varieties of worldwide origin and associations of AFLP markers with quantitative. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 117: 1041-1053. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-008-0843-y]
2. Aghakhani, N., B. Sorkhi and Sh. Nakhjavan. 2011. Non-parametric stability analysis and yield comparison of promising oat lines in Karaj region. In: Proceedings of the First Regional Conference on Ecophysiology of Crop Plants. Islamic Azad University of Shushtar. Shushtar, Iran, pp: 148-152 (In Persian).
3. Agharokh, M. 2002. Evaluation of stability analysis methods in Oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. MSc. Thesis. Isfahan University of Technology. Isfahan, Iran (In Persian).
4. Annicchiarico, P. 1997. Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica, 94: 53-62. [DOI:10.1023/A:1002954824178]
5. Basford, K.E. and M. Cooper. 1998. Genotype by environment interactions and some considerations of their implication for wheat breeding in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 49: 154-175. [DOI:10.1071/A97035]
6. Cocks, P. 1995. Genotype x site interactions in seed production, hard seed breakdown and regeneration of annual medics (Medicago spp.) in west Asia. Journal of Agricultural Science-Cambridge, 125: 199-209. [DOI:10.1017/S002185960008432X]
7. FAO, 2013. Food and Agriculture Organization, Statistics: FAOSTAT agriculture. From http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor
8. Farshadfar, E. 1997. Application of Quantitative Genetics in Plant Breeding. Tagh Bostan, Kermanshah. pp: 528 (In Persian).
9. Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1988. Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76: 1-10. [DOI:10.1007/BF00288824]
10. Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1996. Optimal replication in selection experiments. Crop Science, 36: 838-843. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040002x]
11. Kalateh Jari, S., K. Mostafavi and A. Nabipour. 2016. Intrraction of Genotpe and Environment on the Open Pollinated Sunfllower (Heliantus annuus) Cultivars base on Parametric Methods and Tai Method. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8: 114-122 (In Persian). [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jcb.8.17.122]
12. Kang, M.S. and R. Magari. 1996. New developments in selecting for phenotypic stability in crop breeding. pp. 1-14. In: Kang, M.S. and Zobel, H. G. (eds.) Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. [DOI:10.1201/9781420049374.ch1]
13. Kearsay, M.J. and H.S. Pooni. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Trait, Chapman and Hall, London, pp: 241-265. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4899-4441-2_12]
14. Lin, C.S. and B. Thompson. 1975. An empirical method of grouping genotypes based on a linear function of the genotype-environment interaction. Heredity, 34: 255-263. [DOI:10.1038/hdy.1975.28]
15. Manrique, K. and M. Hermann. 1999-2000. Effect of G × E interaction on root yield and betacarotene content of selected sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas. L.) varieties and breeding clones. CIP Program Report. Lima, Peru, pp: 281-287.
16. Mohammadi, R., M. Armion and M.M. Ahmadi. 2011. Genotype × environment interactions for grain yield of durum wheat genotypes using AMMI model. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 27: 183-198.
17. Mohammadi, R., S.S. Pourdad and A. Amri. 2008. Grain yield stability of spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 59: 546-553. [DOI:10.1071/AR07273]
18. Mohammadinejad, G. and A.M. Rezai. 2005. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction and study of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes pattern. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 9: 77-89 (In Persian).
19. Mohammadi R., D. Sadeghzadeh, M. Armion and M. Ahamadimalek. 2010. Analysis of stability and adaptability of grain yield in durum wheat geneotypes. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi) 91: 70-78 (In Persian).
20. Nirmalakumari, R., G. Sellammal, T. Thamotharan, T. Ezhilarasi and R. Ravikesavan. 2013. Trait association and path analysis for grain yield in oat in the Western zone of Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Agricultural Science, 3: 331-338.
21. Perkinz, J.M. 1972. The principal component analysis of genotype environmental interactions and physical measures of the environment. Heredity, 29: 51-70 [DOI:10.1038/hdy.1972.64]
22. Peterson, D.M., D.M. Wesenberg, D.E. Burrup and C.A. Erickson. 2005. Relationships among agronomic traits and grain composition in oat genotypes grown in different environments. Crop Science, 45: 1249-1255. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.0063]
23. Shafii, B., K.A. Mahler, W.J. Price and D.L. Auld. 1992. Genotype x environment interaction effects on winter rapeseed yield and oil content. Crop Science, 32: 922-927. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200040017x]
24. Taghizadeh, A.A., B. Sorkhilalehloo and S. Nakhjavan. 2016. Study on Stability of Winter Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using Multivariate Statistical Methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8: 87-95 (In Persian). [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jcb.8.17.95]
25. Yan, W. 1999. A study on the methodology of yield trial data analysis-with special reference to winter wheat in Ontario. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
26. Yan, W. and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41: 19-25. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.41119x]
27. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Genotype evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40: 597-605. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x]
28. Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. [DOI:10.1201/9781420040371]
29. Zhang Zhi, F., F. Fuxiao, Q. Jun, SH. Yang hai, Y. Chai, L. Feng bai and Q. Chen. 2010. Analysis on Site Discrimination and Yield Stability of Oat Varieties. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 3: 515-551.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
