Volume 12, Issue 35 (10-2020)                   jcb 2020, 12(35): 91-101 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hasani F, Moslemkhany C, Tahernezhad Z, Jazayeri NooshAbadi M. Adaptation and Yield Stability Evaluation of New Potato Genotypes Using GGE Biplot Method. jcb. 2020; 12 (35) :91-101
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1078-en.html
Agricultural Research, education and Extension Organization (AREEO). Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (350 Views)
In order to achieve greater food security, potato has played a major role in human food chains and achieving maximum yield along with other desirable components can be evaluated by stability and adaptation of diverse genotypes in different regions of our country. In this study, stability and adaptation of new genotypes of potato were evaluated that comprise 10 new early and medium maturity genotypes (Anabella, Taurus, Carrera, Liseta, Volumia, Colomba, crisps4all, Innovator, Leonardo and Sylvana) plus one control of medium maturity genotypes (Sante) and then they were planted in three different regions (Mashhad, Hamedan and Zanjan). All experiments were done in RCBD with three replications in two years (2016-2017). Moreover, they were planted in the fields of private section. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results of early - medium maturity genotypes were investigated in different locations, genotype and genotype in year were significant for every single trait. The effects of year, location in year, and genotype in location were revealed by the results of combined analysis that only showed significant difference for traits of total tube yield, marketable tuber yield, and tuber seed number in plant. Among the medium and early maturity genotypes, the Liseta, Leonardo, Sylvana, Colomba and Carrera genotypes according to high tuber yield (4.66 to 5.03 kg.m-2) are introduced but Colomba, Liseta, and Carrera genotypes (5.03, 4.90 and 4.74 kg.m-2) with highest tuber yield and Anabella genotype with 4.25 kg.m-2 yield had highest adaptation for Zanjan and Mashhad regions respectively and also Sante genotype with 4.53 kg.m-2 yield for Hamedan. The Crisp4all, Innovator, and Taurus genotypes with the aim of consuming in the industrial sector (Chips and French fries) are introduced in particular with respect to high dry matter percentage (23.88, 21.91 and 21.24 % respectively).
Full-Text [PDF 1380 kb]   (72 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2019/09/2 | Revised: 2020/11/24 | Accepted: 2020/04/4 | Published: 2020/10/1

1. Affleck, I., J.A. Sullivan, R. Tarn and R.Yada. 2012. Stability of eight potato genotypes for sugar content and French fry quality at harvest and after storage. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 92: 87-96. [DOI:10.4141/cjps2011-066]
2. Ahmadi, A., H.R. Ebadzeadeh, H. Abdeshah, A. Kazemiyan and M. Rafiei. 2018. Agricultural Statistics. Crop year. 2016-2017. First volume: Crops, 67 pp (In Persian).
3. Anonymous. 2017. The potato sector". Potato Pro. 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2017. https://www.potatopro. com/world/potato-statistics.
4. Arshi, Y. 2000. Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Publications University Jihad Mashhad, 725 pp.
5. Bach, S., R. Yada, B. Bizimungu and J.A. Sullivan. 2012. Genotype by environment interaction effects on fibre components in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica, 187: 77-86. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-012-0734-9]
6. Bai. J., F. Zhao, J. He, C. Wang, H. Chang, J. Zhang and D. Wang. 2014. GGE biplot analysis of genetic variations of 26 potato genotypes in semi-arid regions of Northwest China. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 42(3): 161-169. [DOI:10.1080/01140671.2013.872676]
7. Beukema, H.P. and D.E. Vander Zaag. 1990. Introduction to potato production, Pudoc, the Netherlands. ISBN. 90-220-0963-7. P 1-206.
8. CIP. 2007. Procedures for standard evaluation trials of advanced potato clones. International Potato Center. 126 pp.
9. Danesh, D. 1986. Virus-free seed potatoes production. Agriculture and natural resources, Isfahan (In Persian).
10. Elias, A.A., K.R. Robbins, R. Doerge and M.R. Tuinstra. 2016. Half a century of studying genotype × environment interactions in plant breeding experiments. Crop Science, 56(5): 2090-2105. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0061]
11. Fan, X-M., M.S.Kang, H. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Tan and C. Xu. 2007. Yield stability of maize hybrids evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China. Agronomy Journal, 99: 220-228. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2006.0144]
12. Farshadfar, E., S.H. Sabaghpour and H. Zali. 2012. Comparison of parametric and non‐parametric stability statistics for selecting stable chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under diverse environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6: 514‐524.
13. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46: 1488-1500. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193]
14. Hasanabadi, H. 2004. Investigation and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of different cultivars of potato processing. Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute, Karaj (In Persian).
15. Hasanabadi, H. 2009. Assessment of adaptation and yield comparison of potato clones in spring sowing areas. Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute, Karaj. (In Persian).
16. Hasanabadi, H. and D. Hasanpanah. 2012. Investigation of quantitative, qualitative and tuber yield stability of 18 potato clones in Ardabil region. Ecophysiology of crops, 2(22): 219-233.
17. Hassanpanah, D., R. Shahriari and M.B. Khorshidi. 2006. Evaluation of qualitative characteristics of potato cultivars suitable for processing. Acta Horticulturae, 699(1): 213-218. [DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.699.24]
18. Haynes, K.G., W.E. Potts, J.L. Chittams and D.L. Fleck. 1994. Determination yellow-flesh intensity in potatoes. American Society for horticulture Science, 119(5): 1057-1059. [DOI:10.21273/JASHS.119.5.1057]
19. Hirut, B., Shimelis, H., Fentahun, M., Bonierbale, M., M. Gastelo and Asfaw, A. 2017. Combining ability of highland tropic adapted potato for tuber yield and yield components under drought. Plus One, PLoS ONE, 12(7): e0181541. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0181541]
20. Hoseinzadeh, A.A. 2013. Investigation and selection of single plants of HPH-II/67 population and preliminary evaluation of selected potato clones. Final report of the research project. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Ardebil Province (In Persian).
21. Jansky, S.H. 2010. Potato flavour. American Journal of Potato Research, 87: 209-217. [DOI:10.1007/s12230-010-9127-6]
22. Kang, M.S. 2002. Genotype-Environment Interaction: Progress and Prospects. In: Kang, M.S (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding. (pp. 221-243). UK, CABI International. [DOI:10.1079/9780851996011.0221]
23. Kivuva, B.M., S.M. Githiri, G.C. Yencho and J. Sibiya. 2014. Genotype × Environment interaction for storage root yield in sweet potato under managed drought stress conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6(10): 41-56. [DOI:10.5539/jas.v6n10p41]
24. Kolech, S.A., D. Halseth, W. De Jong, K. Perry, D. Wolfe and F.M. Tiruneh. 2015. Potato variety diversity, determinants and implications for potato breeding strategy in Ethiopia. American Journal of Potato Research, 92(5): 551-66. [DOI:10.1007/s12230-015-9467-3]
25. Krasensky, J. and C. Jonak. 2012. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63: 1593-608. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/err460]
26. Liu, Q., R. Tarn, D. Lynch and N.M. Skjodt. 2007. Physicochemical properties of dry matter and starch from potatoes grown in Canada. Food Chemistry, 105: 897-907. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.034]
27. Love, S., J. Stark and B. King. 2003. Irrigation tips for new varieties. Idaho Potato Conference.
28. Ma, B.L., W. Yan, L.M. Dwyer, J. Frégeau-Reid, H.D. Voldeng and Y. Dion. 2004. Graphic analysis of genotype, environment, nitrogen fertilizer, and their interactions on spring wheat yield. Agronomy Journal, 96: 169-180.
29. Mousapour Gorji, A. 2009. Adaptation assessment of new potato cultivars in spring sowing areas. Seed and Plant Improvement Research Institute, Karaj. (In Persian).
30. Mousapour, Y. 2005. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of potato new cultivars in spring cultivation. Project final report, Seed and plant Improvement Institute. (In Persian).
31. Mulema, J.M.K., E. Adipala, O.M. Olanya and E. Wagoire. 2008. Yield stability analysis of late blight resistant potato selections. Experimental Agriculture, 44: 145-155. [DOI:10.1017/S0014479708006133]
32. Mwololo, J.K., P.W. Muturi, M.W.K. Mburu, R.W. Njeru, N. Kiarie and J. Munyua. 2009. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of genotype × environmental interaction among sweetpotato genotypes. Journal of Animal and Plant Science, 2(3):148-155.
33. Nasseri, A. and Bahramloo, R. 2009. Potato cultivar Marfuna yield and water use efficiency responses to earlyseason water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11: 201-204.
34. Omrani, S., A. Mohammad Naji and M. Esmaeilzadeh Moghaddam. 2017. Yield stability analysis of promising bread wheat lines in southern warm and dry agroclimatic zone of Iran using GGE biplot model. Journal of Crop Breeding, 23(9): 157-165 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.9.23.157]
35. Pandita, M.L., A.S. Sidhu and T.A. Skarora. 1980. Variability and interaction ships between yield and yield component in potato. Haryana. Journal of agricultural research, 424-426.
36. Pourdad, S.S. and M. Jamshid Moghaddam. 2013. Study on Genotype×Environment Interaction Through GGE Biplot for Seed Yield in Spring Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) in Rain-Fed Condition. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5: 12 (In Persian).
37. Roozeboom, K.L., W.T. Schapaugh, M.R.Tuinstra, R.L. Vanderlip and G.A. Milliken. 2008. Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and Grouping Test Locations. Crop Science, 48: 317-330. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0209]
38. Salazar, L.F. 1996. Potato viruses and their control. International Potato Center, 214 pp.
39. Samonte, S.O.P., L.T. Wilson, A.M. McClung and J.C. Medley. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Science, 45: 2414-2424. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.0627]
40. Shahryari Nasab M., R. Chogan, M. Khodarahmi, A. Masomi and S. Khavari khorasani. 2015. Genotype× Environment Interaction for Grain Yield of Maize Hybrids Using the GGE Biplot. Journal of Crop Breeding, 7: 16.
41. Tatarowska, B., B. Flis and E. Zimnoch-Guzowska. 2012. Biological stability to Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in 22 Polish potato cultivars evaluation in field experiments. American Journal of Potato Research, 89: 73-81. [DOI:10.1007/s12230-011-9222-3]
42. Yan, W. 2001. GGE biplot-A windows application for graphical analysis of multi environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal, 93: 1-11. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x]
43. Yan, W. and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42: 11-20. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.1100]
44. Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2002. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists: CRC press, USA. 288 pp. [DOI:10.1201/9781420040371]
45. Yan, W. and N.A. Tinker. 2005. An integrated biplot analysis system for displaying, interpreting and exploring genotype × environment interaction. Crop Science, 45: 1004-1016. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.0076]
46. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40(3): 597-605. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x]
47. Zali, H., E. Farshadfar, S.H. Sabaghpour and R. Karimizadeh. 2012. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in chickpea using measures of stability from AMMI model. Annals of Biological Research, 3(7): 3126-3136.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb