Volume 12, Issue 33 (4-2020)                   jcb 2020, 12(33): 1-8 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ramroudi H, Nasrollahnezhad Ghomi A A, Zaynali Nezhad K, Dehghan M A. (2020). Inheritance of Resistance to Brown Rust Disease in Bread Wheat Via Means of Generation Analysis. jcb. 12(33), 1-8. doi:10.29252/jcb.12.33.1
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1034-en.html
University
Abstract:   (2916 Views)
     Brown wheat rust caused by Puccinia recondita f. sp tritici is one of the most important diseases of wheat in most parts of regions in the world. The progeny of F1, F2, BC1 and BC2 derived from cross of Bolani×ATRI525 and Bolani×ATRI527 with parents, were cultured in a completely randomized block desigen for the study of wheat rust resistance. Trait such as infection, Infection type, contamination coefficient and surface under the disease progression curve were measured and evaluated. Genetic analysis by analysis of means and variance of generations showed that in addition to increasing effects, epistatic effects also play an important role in the control of traits. However, dominance variance had an important role in the control of traits in the incremental variance and there was a significant difference between the generations in terms of all traits in the one percent (P<0.01) level. The results of genotyping average analysis indicated that the dominance of genes was the most important genetic factor in control of the studied traits. Epistatic additive×additive incremental addiction was more important than the epistatic dominance×dominance. The average of heritability for the traits was the percentage of infection, type of contamination, contamination coefficient and under curve of disease progression were 0.88, 0.92, 0.82 and 0.86 for the first population and 0.75, 0.68, 0.62 and 0 59 for the second population. Private heritability for the above mentioned traits was varied by 0.42, 0.34, 0.52 and 0.17 for the first population, and 0.45, 0.39, 0.46 and 0.19 for the second population. The mean genetic dominance (√(H/D) was less than one for all four attributes, indicating the role of dominance effects in trait control.
Full-Text [PDF 520 kb]   (922 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/02/27 | Revised: 2020/05/18 | Accepted: 2019/08/31 | Published: 2020/05/18

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb