Volume 9, Issue 24 (3-2018)                   jcb 2018, 9(24): 10-21 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Talebzadeh1 S J, Hadi H, Amirnia R, Tajbakhsh M, Rezaei Morad Ali M. Evaluating the Relationship between Distributions of Photosynthetic Assimilates Related Traits and Grain Yield in Wheat Genotypes under Terminal Drought Stress Conditions. jcb. 2018; 9 (24) :10-21
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-926-en.html
Department of Agriculture Urmia University
Abstract:   (1125 Views)
In order to study the relationships among traits and grouping genotypes of wheat, 11 promising lines of winter wheat along with Orum, Zareh, Mihan, Zarrin  and peshgam  cultivars were evaluated under two levels of irrigation (complete irrigation and cutting irrigation from flowering to maturity) at Agricultural Research Station of Miandoab during 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 growing seasons. The experiment was conducted as a split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed that the correlation of grain yield was significantly positive with stem weight, peduncle weight, spike weight and harvest index in both conditions. In normal moisture conditions correlation of grain yield with source limitation and limitation of sink by removing the leaves was significantly negative while in water stress conditions its correlation with remobilization rate and contribution of remobilization was significantly positive. Results of regression analysis showed that in normal conditions spike weight, sinks limitations by removing flag leaf and other leaves and in water stress conditions remobilization rate, stem weight and contribution of remobilization justified 61 and 65 percent the variations in grain yield, respectively, and they were identified as traits affecting grain yield. Based on the result of Cluster analysis the genotypes were divided into five groups in normal conditions and into four groups under stress condition. In factor analysis through principal component analysis, three factors were identified in both conditions that explained 71.40 and 65.79 percent of data variations in normal and water stress conditions, respectively.
Full-Text [PDF 744 kb]   (565 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2018/03/10 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2018/03/10 | Published: 2018/03/10

1. Abdoli, M., M. SaidiJalali, S. Honarmand, M. Mansouri fard and S. Ghobadi. 2015. The effects of water stress and limit the source of pollination on seed yield and remobilization wheat varieties. Journal of Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences, 2(2): 137-154 (In Persian).
2. Aghai S., A. Tohid Nejad and M. Nasr Esfahani. 2015. Yield and other agronomic traits comparing in genotypes of durum wheat in Esfahan area. Breeding of Crop and Gardening Plants, 3 (9): 69-77 (In Persian).
3. Babaie Zarch, M., M.H. Fotokian and S. Mahmoodi. 2013. Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes for Morphological Traits using Multivariate Analysis Methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5(12): 109-114 (In Persian).
4. Bahari, N., B. Bahari Bighdilu and L. karpisheh.2014. Studying the correlation and analyzing the path coefficient between grain weight and the traits related to remobilization of assimilates in bread wheat genotypes. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 4(3): 303-308.
5. Bakhshandeh. E., A. Soltani. E. Zeinali and R. Ghadiryan. 2014. Study of dry matter and nitrogen accumulation, remobilization and harvest index in bread and durum wheat cultivars. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 6 (1): 39-59.
6. Cooper, J.C.B. 1983. Factor analysis. An overview. American Statistician, 37: 141-147. [DOI:10.1080/00031305.1983.10482727]
7. Ehdaie, B., G.A. Alloush and J.G. Waines. 2008. Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserve to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Research, 106: 34-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.012]
8. Farshadafar, E. 2005. Principles and multivariate statistical methods (second edition). Kermanshah, Publications Taq Bostan. pp: 734 (In Persian).
9. Mehmet. A. and Y. Tetal. 2006 Path coefficient analysis of, yield and yield components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes. Pakistan Journal Botany, 2(38): 417-424.
10. Modhej, M. 2011. The relationship between source and sink physiological wheat (Triticum aestivum and T. durum) and triticale (Triticale hexaploid Lart.) In Ahvaz environmental conditions. Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(2): 258-264 (In Persian).
11. Naderi, A., A. Hashemi Dezfooli, A. Majid Behravan and A.H. Noor Mohammad. 2000. The study correlations among traits affecting grain weight and influence of some physiological parameters on grain yield of spring wheat in favorable conditions and drought. Journal of plant and Seed, 16(3): 374-386 (In Persian).
12. Nakhaeei Badr Abadi, M., M. Shokrpour, A. Asghari and A.O. Esfandyari. 2013. Determining Relationships among Dry Matter Remobilization and Some Morphological Traits in Barley Genotypes Using Factor Analysis Method under Low Water Stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5(12): 85-98 (In Persian).
13. Nakhaii Badrabadi, M. and M. Shokrpour. 2015. Grouping of Barley Genotypes Using Molecular and Morphological Markers and Dry Matter Remobilization to Grain under Water Deficit.Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 22(4.1):135-150.
14. Nikoseresht, R., A. Mohammadi, A. Majidi Harvan and K.H. Mostafavi. 2014. Evaluation of advanced lines of bread wheat in both stress and non-stress F7. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 6(1): 107-97 (In Persian).
15. Nouriyani, H. 2015. Effect of Paclobutrazol on the redistribution of assimilates to seed in three varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under heat stress conditions. Journal of Crop Physiology, 7(25): 89-104
16. (In Persian).
17. Ogbonnaya, F.C., O. Abdalla, A. Mujeeb‐Kazi, A.G. Kazi, S.S. Xu, N. Gosman, E.S. Lagudah, D. Bonnett, M.E. Sorrells and H. Tsujimoto. 2013. Synthetic hexaploids: harnessing species of the primary gene pool for wheat improvement. Plant Breeding Reviews, 37: 35-122. [DOI:10.1002/9781118497869.ch2]
18. Romesburg, H.C. 2004. Cluster analysis for researches. LULU Press, North Carolina, 333 Pp.
19. Sanjarei Pirvatlou, A. and A. Yazdansepas. 2009. Genotypic variation of stem reserves in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under post-anthesis drought stress condition. Iranian Journal Field Crop Science, 29: 181-191 (In Persian).
20. Shokrpour, M. and E. Esfandiari. 2014. Grouping Different Wheat Varieties for Salt Tolerance using Some Biochemical and Physiological Indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 6(4): 54-66 (In Persian).
21. Taqi Zadeghan, M., M. Norozi and S. Aharizad. 2015. Evaluation of recombinant inbred lines of bread wheat In terms of agronomic and Morphological traits. Iranian Journal of Crop and Horticultural Breeding, 2(3): 137-149 (In Persian).
22. Yazdansepas, A., M. Rezaie, M. Chiychi, S.A. Nazeri Razave, M.S. Sanjare, T.R. Abede Babaei, A.G. Soltane, P. Salehe and S.K. Hosenebay. 2010. Study of the morpho-physiological traits and stability of grain yield in promising winter and facultative wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in cold regions. Final report, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. (Final report No: 40.143) (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb