Volume 10, Issue 28 (12-2018)
jcb 2018, 10(28): 83-92 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
yahoueian S H, arvin P. (2018). Evaluation of Soybean (Glycin max L.) Genotypes under Drought Stress using Total Ranking Index (TRI). jcb. 10(28), 83-92. doi:10.29252/jcb.10.28.83
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-923-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-923-en.html
Evaluation of Soybean (Glycin max L.) Genotypes under Drought Stress using Total Ranking Index (TRI)
Department of Agriculture Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2924 Views)
In order to study the drought stress in soybean (Glycin max L.), experiments with two stages and 25 soybean genotypes based on Simple Lattice Design 5×5 with two replications in two locations (normal and drought condition) were carried out in Bojnourd. Also evaluation of germination traits with three replications based on Completely Randomized Design has performed. Drought stress was applied in farm after plant establishment at second trifoliate (V2) by irrigation period and in germination experiment, drought stress, has been applied in two levels (normal and -9 bar). Results revealed that among 20 measured traits in field condition, the most reduction in yield components were related to biomass with 32.6% and number of seed per plant with 26.6% respectively. Also drought stress caused a reduction in yield in area by 46.7% and single plant yield by 35.2%. Korona genotype with 69.9% had the highest reduction and Capital genotype with 10.7% had the lowest reduction regarding final yield. Germination assoys showed that plumule with 83.3% and seed length index with 80.44% had the most significant reduction. Considering the Total Ranking Index (TRI), Capital, Chaleston and Jame×Williams genotypes were more resistant to drought stress and Korona and Amuroska were more sensitive to drought stress. Ranking was done by two methods: SDI, TRI. Mann Whitney nonparametric test did not show significant differences among genotypes ranking in these two methods.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2018/03/5 | Revised: 2019/03/2 | Accepted: 2018/06/3 | Published: 2019/03/2
Received: 2018/03/5 | Revised: 2019/03/2 | Accepted: 2018/06/3 | Published: 2019/03/2
References
1. Abaslo, L., S.A. Kazemini and M. Edalat. 2014. Effect of drought stress and cultivation methods on yield and yield components of two varieties Cicer Arientum. Pajoheshhaye hoboobat Iran. 5(1): 90(in persian)
2. Ahmadi, M.R. and F. Javidfar. 2000. Screening and breeding techniques for drought resistance in oleiferous brassicae. Nashr Amoozesh Keshavarzi. Iran (in persian)
3. ASgari nia, P. Mir lohi ,A. Saeidi, A. Mohamadi,M. Gheisari,M. and Sadat Razavi,V.2013.Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic variation and drought tolerant in F3 families in drought stress condition. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences.2(16):137-150.
4. Bihamta, M. M, Shirkavand. J, Hasanpour. And A, Afzalifar.2018. Evaluation of Durum Wheat Genotypes under Normal Irrigation and Drought Stress Conditions. jcb. 2018; 9 (24) :119-136
5. Braga, L.F., M.P. Sousa., J.F. Braga., and M.E. Sa.1999. Efeitoda disponibilidade hidricado substrato na qualidad fisiologica de feijao.Revisrta brasilaira de sementes.21:95-102 [DOI:10.17801/0101-3122/rbs.v21n2p95-102]
6. Cruz de Carvalho, M.H. 2005. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species Production, scavenging and signaling. Plant Signaling & Behavior 3:3, 156-165 [DOI:10.4161/psb.3.3.5536]
7. Dehghanshoar, M., A. Hamidi and S. Mobasser. 2005. Handbook of vigor test methods. Agricultural Education Press. 193 pp. (In Persian)
8. Dodd, G.L. and L.A. Donovan. 1999. Water potential and ionic effects on germination and seedling growth two cold desert shrubs. Am. J, Bot, 86:1146-153. [DOI:10.2307/2656978]
9. Eck, H.V., A.C. Mathers, and J.T. Musick. 1987. Plant water stress at various growth stages and growth and yield of soybeans. Field Crop research, 17:1-16. [DOI:10.1016/0378-4290(87)90077-3]
10. Entz, M.H., and D.B. Flower.1990.Differential agronomic response of winter wheat cultivars to parenthesis environmental stress. Crop sci 30:1119-1123 [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000050032x]
11. Farshadfar, A.1998. Plant breeding methodology. Razee university press. Keramnshah. Iran.(in farsi)
12. Farshadfar, E., M.M, Pour Siahbidi ., and A.R, Pour Aboughadareh .2012. Repeatability of drought tolerance indices in bread wheat genotypes. Inter J Agri Crop Sci 4(13):891-903.
13. Gaikwad, S.E., R.A, Shinde ., R.B, Thoke. and V.T, Aparadh .2013. Potential of drought stress in two varieties of capsicum annum grown in Maharashtra. International journal of research in pharmacy and chemistry.2(3)2013
14. Harris, D., R.S. Tripathi., and A. Joshi. 2002. On-farm seed priming to improve crop establishment and yield in dry direct-seeded rice, in: Pandey S., Mortimer M., Wade L., Tuong T.P., Lopes K., Hardy B. (Eds.), Direct seeding : Research strategies and opportunities, International research institute, Manila, Philippines, pp. 231-240.
15. Haasstrup Pedersen, L., P. E. Jorgensen and I. Poulsen. 1993. Effect of seed vigor and dormancy on field emergence, development and grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter barley (Hordeum vulgAre L.). Seed Sci. Technol. 21: 159-178.
16. Johnson, R.R. and L.M. Wax. 1981. Stand establishment and yield of corn as affected by herbicides and seed vigor. Agron J. 75: 859- 863. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1981.00021962007300050026x]
17. Kaya, M.D., G. Okçub., M. Ataka., Y. Çıkılıc., and O. Kolsarıcıa. 2006. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus anus L.), Eur. J. Agron. 24: 291-295. [DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.001]
18. Kazemitabar, S. K.,S. betoorak., K.fotoohi. and M. Rezaee.2006. indentifying the drought resistance genotypes in sunflower(Heliantus annus ) by resistance index and 3D and 2 D charts.oloom keshavarzi iran.1.28(2):357-366
19. Khalili, M., M.R, Naghavi ., A.R, Pour Aboughadareh, and J. Talebzadeh. 2012. Evaluating of drought stress tolerance based on selection indices in spring canola cultivars (Brassica napus L). JAS 4(11):78-85. [DOI:10.5539/jas.v4n11p78]
20. Leport, L., N.C. Turner., S.L. Davies., and K.H.M. Siddique. 2006. Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought. European Journal of Agronomy. 24 (3):236-246. [DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.005]
21. Liu, F., C.R. Jensen and M.N. Andersen. 2004. Pod set related to photosynthetic rate and endogenous ABA in soybeans susbjected to different water regimes and exogenous ABA and BA at early reproductive stages. Ann Bot. 94: 405. [DOI:10.1093/aob/mch157]
22. Lopez, F.B., C. Johansen., and Y.S, Chauhan. 1996. Effect of timing of drought stress on phenology, yield and yield components of a short-duration pigeon pea. J Agron & Crop Sci. 177: 311-320. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1996.tb00251.x]
23. Mahajan, S. and N. Tuteja. 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview, archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 444 (2):139-158. [DOI:10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018]
24. Maleki, A., A. Naderi., R. Naseri., A. Fathi., S. Bahamin, and R. Maleki. 2013. Physiological Performance of Soybean Cultivars under drought stress, Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 6: 38-44.
25. Masoumi, H., F. Darvish., J. Daneshian., G. Normohammadi, and D. Habibi.2011. Effects of water deficit stress on seed yield and antioxidants content in soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars. African Journal of agricultural Research. 6(5): 1209-1218.
26. Mederski, H. J., D. L, Jeffers, and D.B, Peters. 1973. Water and water relations. In: Caldwell, B. E., ed. Soybeans: Improvement, production, and uses. Madison: ASA, pp. 239 - 266.
27. Mwanamwenge, J., S.P, Loss., K.H.M, Siddique, and P.S. Cocks. 1998. Growth, seed yield and water use of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in a short season Mediterranean -type environment. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 38:171-180. [DOI:10.1071/EA97098]
28. Naghavi,A.R., A.R, Pour aboughadareh,and M, Khalili.2013. Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Indices for Screening Some of Corn (Zea mays L.) Cultivars under Environmental Conditions. Not Sci Biol, 2013, 5(3):388-393 [DOI:10.15835/nsb539049]
29. Nezami, E. and M, Izadkhah. 2011. Evaluation of drought stress on physiological and morphological traits of brassica napu. Iranian plant physiology. 2011 : 3. (in farsi)
30. Rosenberg, M., R.C. Hall, and E.K. Twidell. 2012. Effects of drought stress on soybean production. South Dakota State University Extension. 03-2009-2012. https://igrow.org/.
31. Sarmadnia, G.H and A. KoochAki.1993. Physiological aspects of dryland farming. Jahad Daneshghahi Mashhad Press. (in Farsi)
32. Seong, R.C., H.J, Chung., and E.H, Hong.1988.Varietals responses of soybean germination and seedling elongation to temperature And Poly ethylene glycol solution. Korean J of crop science.33:31-37.
33. Solhi,S.A., Nemati,N. and M, Panahi.2009. Effect of irrigation interval on soybean cultivars in the Varamin region. National conference of New achievements in the production of oilseed plants,bojnourd.Azad Islamic university. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-CBIAU01-CBIAU01_088.html
34. Steiner, J.J., D.F, Grabe. and A, Tulo. 1989. Single and multiple vigor tests for predicting seedling emergence of wheat. Crop Sci. 27: 782- 789. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900030049x]
35. Tavakolafshari, R., A. Abbasi sooraki. and A, Ghasemi. 2009. Seed Technology and its biological basis. Jihad-e- Daneshgahi Mashhad University Press. 515 pp. (In Persian).
36. Yahoueian, S.H., M.R. Bihamta., D. Habibi. and H.R. Babaei. 2006. Evaluation of soybean genotyps under drought stress condition. MSc. Thesis. Islamic Azad University, Karaj. (in farsi)
37. Yudi, H., S. Sardjono. and T. Husni. 2016. Influence drought stress on soybean production. Journal ilmiah jursan budidaya pertanian .1(1):40-53.
38. Zeid, I. M. and Z.A. Shedeed .2006. Response of alfalfa to putrescine treatment under drought stress, Biol. Plant. 50:635-640. [DOI:10.1007/s10535-006-0099-9]
39. Zhang. J., X. Cao., T.Yong., and W.Y, Ang. 2012. Seed treatment with uniconazole powder induced drought tolerance of soybean in relation to changes in photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Research on Crops 13(1):147-154.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
