دوره 9، شماره 23 - ( پاییز 1396 )                   جلد 9 شماره 23 صفحات 8-1 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Arminian A, Houshamnd S. (2017). Investigation and Importance of Relationships of Grain Yield and Yield Components in Wheat Breeding (Triticum Aestivum L.) . jcb. 9(23), 1-8. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.23.1
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-868-fa.html
آرمینیان علی، هوشمند سعدالله. بررسی و نقش روابط عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه در به‌نژادی گندم (Triticum aestivum L.) پژوهشنامه اصلاح گیاهان زراعی 1396; 9 (23) :8-1 10.29252/jcb.9.23.1

URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-868-fa.html


دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه ایلام
چکیده:   (4432 مشاهده)
تعیین روابط بین عملکرد دانه و اجزای آن در گندم نان جهت تولید پایدار اهمیت اساسی دارد. جهت تعیین صفات کلیدی مؤثر بر عملکرد دانه و همچنین بررسی اثرات مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بین عملکرد دانه با اجزاء آن، تحقیق حاضر در طی سال‌های زراعی 1388-1385 با 94 لاین دبل‌هاپلوئید، والدین و 5 رقم بومی ایرانی درآزمایش در قالب طرح لاتیس سه‌گانه در مزرعه اجرا گردید. نتایج، نشان­دهنده همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌دار بین عملکرد دانه با صفات: تعداد دانه در سنبله، شاخص برداشت، تعداد پنجه بارور و عرض برگ پرچم و نیز همبستگی منفی بالا بین عملکرد و تعداد پنجه کل، ارتفاع بوته و تعداد گره بود. نتایج تجزیه ضرایب مسیر (علیت)، نیز نشان‌دهنده اثرات مستقیم قوی و معنی‌دار صفات وابسته به عملکرد همانند شاخص برداشت (27/0) و وزن صد دانه (09/0) بر عملکرد دانه بود. با توجه به یک­نواختی جامعه دبل‌هاپلوئید، نتایج این بررسی نشان می‌دهد که ویژگی‌هایی مانند شاخص برداشت، وزن صددانه، طول سنبله، تعداد پنجه بارور، طول و عرض برگ پرچم را می‌توان به­عنوان معیارهایی گزینشی جهت بهبود و افزایش عملکرد دانه در گندم نان در کارهای به­نژادی معرفی نمود. 
متن کامل [PDF 741 kb]   (1543 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
دریافت: 1396/9/28 | ویرایش نهایی: 1398/1/25 | پذیرش: 1396/9/28 | انتشار: 1396/9/28

فهرست منابع
1. Curtis, B.C. 2002. Wheat in the world. In: B.C. Curtis, S. Rajaram and H.G. Macpherson (eds). Bread wheat improvement and oild production. Available at: Http://www.fao.org. 567 pp.
2. Yildrim, M., N. Budak and Y. Arshas. 1993. Factor analysis of yield and related traits in bread wheat. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 1: 11-15.
3. Dawari, N.H. and O.P. Lutra. 1991. Character association studies under high and low environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25: 515-518.
4. Jinks, J.L. and H.S. Pooni. 1980. Comparing predictions of mean performance and environmental sensitivity of recombinant inbred lines based upon F3 and triple test cross families. Heredity, 45: 305-312. [DOI:10.1038/hdy.1980.73]
5. Toosimojarad, M. and M.R. Bihamta. 2007. Study on grain yield and other quantitative traits using factor anlaysis. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17: 97-107 (In Persian).
6. Rafiei, F. and G. Saeidi. 2005. Phenotypic and genotypic relationships between agronomic taits and yield components in Carthamus. Journal of Scientific Agriculture, 28: 137-148 (In Persian).
7. Rezaei, A.M. and A. Soltani. 1998. Introduction to applied regression analysis. Isfahan Technology University, 294 pp.
8. Kozak, M. and R.A. Azevedo. 2014. Path analysis: what does "sequential" mean? Scientia Agricola, 71: 525-527. [DOI:10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0186]
9. Dorrani-Nejad, M., G. Mohammadi-Nejad and B. Nakhoda. 2016. Assessment of relationship between agronomic traits and grain yield in recombinant inbred lines derived from Roshan × Falat wheat varieties under drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20): 52-59 (In Persian).
10. Ghaedrahmati, M., M. Mardi, M.R. Naghavi, E. Majidi Haravan, B. Nakhoda, A. Azadi and G. Mohamadinezhad. 2017. Statistical analysis of yields and its component of seeds resulted from early crosses of wheat cultivars under salinity conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21): 56-66 (In Persian).
11. Khandani, S., G. Mohammadinejad and B. Nakhoda. 2017. Relationships between Important agronomic and phonological traits in inbred lines from the crosses Roshan × Sabalan in bread wheat. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21): 10-17 (In Persian).
12. Aly, R.M. and A.Y.A. El-Bana.1994. Grain yield anaysis for nine wheat cultivars grown in newly cultivated sandy soil under N fertilizers levels. Zagazing Journal Agricultural Research, 21: 67-77.
13. Arminian, A., S. Houshmand, and B. Shiran. 2010. Evaluation of relationships between grain yield and some of its related traits in a doubled-bread wheat haploid population [Augmented design]. Electronic Journal of Crops Production, 3: 21-38 (In Persian).
14. Knox, R.E., J.M. Clarke and R.M. DePauw. 2000. Dicamba and growth condition effects ondouble haploid production in durum wheat crossed with maize. Plant Breeding, 119: 289-293. [DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00498.x]
15. Arminian, A., M.S. Kang, M. Kozak, S. Houshmand and P. Mathews. 2008. MULTPATH: A comprehensive minitab program for computing path coefficients and multiple regressions for multivariate analyses. Journal of Crop Improvement, 22: 82-120. [DOI:10.1080/15427520802043182]
16. Farahani, F. and A. Arzani. 2006. Study on genetic diversity of culltivars and F1 hybrids using agronomic and morphologic traits. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 10: 341-354 (In Persian).
17. Golabadi, M., A. Arzani and S.A.M.M. Meybodi. 2008. Effect of humidity stress of end-season on yield and morphophysiologic traits in F3 families of durum wheat. Journal of Agronomic Researches of Iran, 6: 405-418 (In Persian).
18. Emam, Y., A.M. Ranjbari and M.J. Bohrani. 2007. Evaluation of grain yield and its componets in wheat genotypes at drought stress after anthesis. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 11: 317-327 (In Persian).
19. Iravani, M., M. Solooki, A.M. Rezaei, B.A. Siasar and Sh.A. Koohkan. 2008. Study on diversity and determining relationships between agronomic traits with yield in advanced lines of barley using factor analysis. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 12: 137-145 (In Persian).
20. Ahmadi, M., B. Kamkar, A. Soltani and Z. Eynali. 2008. Determining the mos important component of bread wheat grain yield at various ultivation times, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 15: 52-65 (In Persian).
21. Khodarahmi, M., A. Amini, and M.R. Bihamta. 2006. Study on relationship of traits and path analysis of grain yield of Triticale. Jouranl of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 1: 77-83 (In Persian).
22. Heydari, B., G. Saeidi and B.A. Seyed Tabatabaei. 2007. Factor analysis for quantitative traits and path coefficient analysis of grain yield in wheat. Sciences and Natural Resources, 11: 135-143 (In Persian).
23. Poorsiahbidi, M.M. 1998. Study on genetic diversity of durum wheat lines in Esfehan zone and providing amphiploid wheat. Agriculture faculty, Isfehan Technology University, 131 pp.
24. Sorkhilelahloo, B., Y. Samadi, S. Abdemishani and A. Gerami. 1998. Study on relationship of grain yield with quantitative traits in 500 wheat lines using factor anlaysis. Jouranl of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 29: 263-377 (In Persian).
25. Montgomery, D.S., E.A. Peck and G.G. Vining. 2012. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 5th edn. John Wiley and Sons, 672 pp.
26. Zeynali, H., A.F. Mirlohi and L. Safahi. 2006. Study on relationship of grain yield per plant with yield components of sesame genotypes. Jouranl of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 2: 1-9 (In Persian).
27. Dewey, D.R. and K.H. Lu. 1959. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51: 515-518. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x]
28. Arminian, A. and S. Houshmand. 2012. Additive main and multiplicative interaction effect in stability analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield. Journal of Crop Breeding, Sari, 4: 1-13 (In Persian).
29. Curtis, B.C. 2002. Wheat in the world. In: B.C. Curtis, S. Rajaram and H.G. Macpherson (eds). Bread wheat improvement and oild production. Available at: Http://www.fao.org. 567 pp.
30. Yildrim, M., N. Budak and Y. Arshas. 1993. Factor analysis of yield and related traits in bread wheat. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 1: 11-15.
31. Dawari, N.H. and O.P. Lutra. 1991. Character association studies under high and low environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25: 515-518.
32. Jinks, J.L. and H.S. Pooni. 1980. Comparing predictions of mean performance and environmental sensitivity of recombinant inbred lines based upon F3 and triple test cross families. Heredity, 45: 305-312. [DOI:10.1038/hdy.1980.73]
33. Toosimojarad, M. and M.R. Bihamta. 2007. Study on grain yield and other quantitative traits using factor anlaysis. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17: 97-107 (In Persian).
34. Rafiei, F. and G. Saeidi. 2005. Phenotypic and genotypic relationships between agronomic taits and yield components in Carthamus. Journal of Scientific Agriculture, 28: 137-148 (In Persian).
35. Rezaei, A.M. and A. Soltani. 1998. Introduction to applied regression analysis. Isfahan Technology University, 294 pp.
36. Kozak, M. and R.A. Azevedo. 2014. Path analysis: what does "sequential" mean? Scientia Agricola, 71: 525-527. [DOI:10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0186]
37. Dorrani-Nejad, M., G. Mohammadi-Nejad and B. Nakhoda. 2016. Assessment of relationship between agronomic traits and grain yield in recombinant inbred lines derived from Roshan × Falat wheat varieties under drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20): 52-59 (In Persian).
38. Ghaedrahmati, M., M. Mardi, M.R. Naghavi, E. Majidi Haravan, B. Nakhoda, A. Azadi and G. Mohamadinezhad. 2017. Statistical analysis of yields and its component of seeds resulted from early crosses of wheat cultivars under salinity conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21): 56-66 (In Persian).
39. Khandani, S., G. Mohammadinejad and B. Nakhoda. 2017. Relationships between Important agronomic and phonological traits in inbred lines from the crosses Roshan × Sabalan in bread wheat. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21): 10-17 (In Persian).
40. Aly, R.M. and A.Y.A. El-Bana.1994. Grain yield anaysis for nine wheat cultivars grown in newly cultivated sandy soil under N fertilizers levels. Zagazing Journal Agricultural Research, 21: 67-77.
41. Arminian, A., S. Houshmand, and B. Shiran. 2010. Evaluation of relationships between grain yield and some of its related traits in a doubled-bread wheat haploid population [Augmented design]. Electronic Journal of Crops Production, 3: 21-38 (In Persian).
42. Knox, R.E., J.M. Clarke and R.M. DePauw. 2000. Dicamba and growth condition effects ondouble haploid production in durum wheat crossed with maize. Plant Breeding, 119: 289-293. [DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00498.x]
43. Arminian, A., M.S. Kang, M. Kozak, S. Houshmand and P. Mathews. 2008. MULTPATH: A comprehensive minitab program for computing path coefficients and multiple regressions for multivariate analyses. Journal of Crop Improvement, 22: 82-120. [DOI:10.1080/15427520802043182]
44. Farahani, F. and A. Arzani. 2006. Study on genetic diversity of culltivars and F1 hybrids using agronomic and morphologic traits. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 10: 341-354 (In Persian).
45. Golabadi, M., A. Arzani and S.A.M.M. Meybodi. 2008. Effect of humidity stress of end-season on yield and morphophysiologic traits in F3 families of durum wheat. Journal of Agronomic Researches of Iran, 6: 405-418 (In Persian).
46. Emam, Y., A.M. Ranjbari and M.J. Bohrani. 2007. Evaluation of grain yield and its componets in wheat genotypes at drought stress after anthesis. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 11: 317-327 (In Persian).
47. Iravani, M., M. Solooki, A.M. Rezaei, B.A. Siasar and Sh.A. Koohkan. 2008. Study on diversity and determining relationships between agronomic traits with yield in advanced lines of barley using factor analysis. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 12: 137-145 (In Persian).
48. Ahmadi, M., B. Kamkar, A. Soltani and Z. Eynali. 2008. Determining the mos important component of bread wheat grain yield at various ultivation times, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 15: 52-65 (In Persian).
49. Khodarahmi, M., A. Amini, and M.R. Bihamta. 2006. Study on relationship of traits and path analysis of grain yield of Triticale. Jouranl of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 1: 77-83 (In Persian).
50. Heydari, B., G. Saeidi and B.A. Seyed Tabatabaei. 2007. Factor analysis for quantitative traits and path coefficient analysis of grain yield in wheat. Sciences and Natural Resources, 11: 135-143 (In Persian).
51. Poorsiahbidi, M.M. 1998. Study on genetic diversity of durum wheat lines in Esfehan zone and providing amphiploid wheat. Agriculture faculty, Isfehan Technology University, 131 pp.
52. Sorkhilelahloo, B., Y. Samadi, S. Abdemishani and A. Gerami. 1998. Study on relationship of grain yield with quantitative traits in 500 wheat lines using factor anlaysis. Jouranl of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 29: 263-377 (In Persian).
53. Montgomery, D.S., E.A. Peck and G.G. Vining. 2012. Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 5th edn. John Wiley and Sons, 672 pp.
54. Zeynali, H., A.F. Mirlohi and L. Safahi. 2006. Study on relationship of grain yield per plant with yield components of sesame genotypes. Jouranl of Agricultural Sciences of Iran, 2: 1-9 (In Persian).
55. Dewey, D.R. and K.H. Lu. 1959. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51: 515-518. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x]
56. Arminian, A. and S. Houshmand. 2012. Additive main and multiplicative interaction effect in stability analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield. Journal of Crop Breeding, Sari, 4: 1-13 (In Persian).

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به پژوهشنامه اصلاح گیاهان زراعی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb