Volume 11, Issue 29 (3-2019)
jcb 2019, 11(29): 169-180 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Leila Farjam Hajiagha L, Nouraein M, hatami maleki H, vaezi B, Hossienpour T. (2019). Investigation of Diversity and Classification of Some Barley Lines using Physiological and Morphological Characteristics. jcb. 11(29), 169-180. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.29.169
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-865-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-865-en.html
Leila Leila Farjam Hajiagha 
, Mojtaba Nouraein , Hamid Hatami maleki , Behrouz Vaezi , Tahmaseb Hossienpour
, Mojtaba Nouraein , Hamid Hatami maleki , Behrouz Vaezi , Tahmaseb Hossienpour
Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
Abstract: (3478 Views)
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as one of the main crops is important economically for Iran. Genetic diversity and it`s evaluation is foundation of plant breeding projects. Awareness about genetic variation is effective in selection of parental lines for future breeding programs. This study was aimed to evaluate both morphological and physiological characteristics followed by classification of 18 barley inbred lines based on RCBD design with four replications. Results of descriptive statistics revealed vast range of variation for most of studied traits. Among studied traits, seed yield with standard deviation of 614.06 possessed maximum divergent. Also, hectoliter weight and grain yield had the lowest and the highest coefficients of variation values of 0.58 and 8.88, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance depicted remarkable genetic variation among studied genotypes based on morphological and physiological traits. Classification of studied barley genotypes using both types of inspected traits could classify them in 3 separate groups. In this research, there was not any coincidence between two types of classifications. This is resulted that line number 3 with high pedanclean length (7.18 cm), 1000 kernel weight (42.2 gr), yield (5172.5 kgh-1), dry matter percentage (31.3 %), fresh weight (0.463 gr), turgusens weight (0.717 gr), relative water content (58.82 %) and also another moderate characteristics could considerable as promising one for arid and semi-arid region after regional field trials.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/12/10 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2018/08/18 | Published: 2019/05/8
Received: 2017/12/10 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2018/08/18 | Published: 2019/05/8
References
1. Baker, N.R. 2008. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59: 89-113. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant, 59: 032607.092759. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759]
2. Bakhshi Khaniki, Gh., F. Fattahi and S. Yazdchi. 2007. Drought effects of morphologic traits of 10 barley varieties in Osko area, Eastern Azarbaijan province. Pajouhesh VA Sazandegi, 19(4): 108-114 (In Persian).
3. Diab, A.A., B. Teulat-Merah, D. This, N.Z. Ozturk, D. Benscher and M.E. Sorrells. 2004. Identification of drought-inducible genes and differentially expressed sequence tags in barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109(7): 1417-1425. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-004-1755-0]
4. Donaldson, E. 1996. Crop traits for water stress tolerance. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 11: 89-94. [DOI:10.1017/S0889189300006846]
5. Ebadi, A., K. Sahed and A.H. Sanjari. 2012. The effect of irrigation cut on dry matter remobilization and some of agronomy traits on spring barley. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 4(4): 19-38 (In Persian).
6. Eshghi, R. and E. Akhundova. 2010. Genetic diversity in hulless barley based on agromorphological traits and RAPD markers and comparison with storage protein analysis. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(1): 97-107.
7. FAO. 2015. FAO statistical database. http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/collections?subset=agriculture. 5.
8. Gandomkar, S. 1999. Genetic diversity among winter barley landraces collected from northwest of Iran. MSc Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil Branch, IRAN, 45-80 (In Persian).
9. Ganji, M., E. Farahmandfar, M. Shahbazi and M. Zahravi. 2016. Biochemical characterization and grain yield of selected genotypes of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) different levels of drought stress. Journal of Plant Process and Function. Journal of Plant Process and Function, Iranin Society of Plant Physiology, 5(15): 75-90 (In Persian).
10. Hamza, S., W.B. Hamida, A. Rebai and M. Harrabi. 2004. SSR-based genetic diversity assessment among Tunisian winter barley and relationship with morphological traits. Euphytica, 135(1): 107-118. [DOI:10.1023/B:EUPH.0000009547.65808.bf]
11. Ibrahim, O.M., M.H. Mohamed, M.M. Tawfik and E.A. Badr. 2011. Genetic diversity assessment of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using cluster analysis. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2): 81-85.
12. Jafarnezhad, A., H. Aghaie and G. Najafian. 2013. Effective traits on grain yield of wheat genotypes under optimal irrigation and drought stress during reproductive phase. Journal of Applied Crop Breeding, 1(1): 11-22 (In Persian).
13. Johnson, A.M. and D.B. Fowler. 1992. Response of no-till winter wheat to nitrogen fertilization and drought stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 72(4): 1075-1089. [DOI:10.4141/cjps92-134]
14. Karimi, H. 2008. Crops. 6th edn. Tehran University Press, Tehran, IRAN, 714 pp.
15. Khazaei, A., M. Moghaddam and S. Noormohammadi. 2012. Genetic diversity of winter barley landraces collected from west of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 13(4): 671-683 (In Persian).
16. Manly, B.F.J. 2004. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. Third Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. London, ENGLAND, 224 pp. [DOI:10.1201/b16974]
17. Mohammadi, M., A. Talei, H. Zeinali, M.R. Naghavi and M. Baum. 2008. Mapping some QTLs controlling drought tolerance in a doubled haploid population. Seed and Seedling, 24: 1-15 (In Persian).
18. Moinuddin, A. and R. Khana-Chopra. 2004. Osmotic adjustment in chickpea in relation to seed yield and yield parameters. Crop Science, 44(2): 449-455.
19. Ozturk, Z.N., V. Talame, M. Deyholos, C.B. Michalowski, S.W. Galbraith, N. Gozukirmizi, R. Tuberosa and H.J. Bohnert. 2002. Monitoring large-scale changes in transcript abundance in drought- and salt-stressed barley. Plant Molcular Biology, 48(5-6): 551-573. [DOI:10.1023/A:1014875215580]
20. Pask, A.J.D., J. Pietragalla, D.M. Mullan and M.P. Reynolds. 2012. Physiological Breeding II: A Field Guide to Wheat Phenotyping. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). MEXICO, 133 pp.
21. Reif, J.C., X.C. Xia, A.E. Melchinger, M.L. Warburton, D.A. Hoisington, D. Beck, M. Bohn and M. Frisch. 2004. Genetic diversity determined within and among CIMMYT maize population of tropical, subtropical, and temperate germplasm by SSR markers. Crop Science, 44(1): 326-334. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.3260]
22. Rezaei Kalow, S., M. Khodarahmi and K.H. Mostafavi. 2013. Study of traits in different barley types using factor analysis under terminal drought stress and without stress conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 8(3): 149-160 (In Persian)
23. Richards, R.A., A.G. Condon and G.J. Rebetzke. 2001. Traits to improve yield in dry environments in application of physiology in wheat breeding. In: Reynolds, M.P., J.I. Ortiz-Monasterio and A. McNab (Eds.). Applying physiology to wheat breeding, Mexico, D.F: CIMMYT, 88-100 pp.
24. Rischbeck, P., P. Baresel, S. Elsayed, B. Mistele and U. Schmidhalter. 2014. Development of a diurnal dehydration index for spring barley phenotyping. Functional Plant Biology, 41(12): 1249-1260. [DOI:10.1071/FP14069]
25. Rudbar Kelari, F., E. Farshadfar and B. Ghareyazi. 2002. Evaluation of genetic diversity of Iranian rice (Oryza sativa L.) using RAPD markers. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 3(4): 8-15 (In Persian).
26. Samarah, N.H. 2005. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 25(1): 145-149. [DOI:10.1051/agro:2004064]
27. Senobar, A., S.A. Tabatabayi and F. Dehghani. 2011. Effect of irrigation intervals on grain yield, yield components and harvest index of bread wheat cultivars in Yazd region. Journal of Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 3(2): 95-104 (In Persian).
28. Shahmoradi, S., M.R. Chaeichi, J. Mozafari, D. Mazaheri and F. Sharifzadeh. 2013. Evaluation of genetic and geographic diversity of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum L.) ecotypes from different habitats in Iran. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Science, 44(2): 209-225 (In Persian).
29. Shakhatreh, Y., N. Haddad, M. Alrababah, S. Grando and S. Ceccarelli. 2010. Phenotypic diversity in wild barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. Spontaneum (C. Koch) Thell.) accessions collected in Jordan. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 57(1): 131-146. [DOI:10.1007/s10722-009-9457-8]
30. Sharma, P., S. Sareen and M. Saini. 2016. Assessing genetic variation for heat stress tolerance in Indian bread wheat genotypes using morpho-physiological traits and molecular marker, Plant Genetic Resources,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262116000241 [DOI:10.1017/S1479262116000241.]
31. Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhary. 1977. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Dehli, INDIA, 318 pp.
32. Tajalli, H., S.G. Mousavi, R. Baradaran, M.H. Saberi and E. Arazmjoo. 2013. Evaluation of 20 barley genotypes under the terminal drought condition. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 7(1): 91-104 (In Persian).
33. Zaheer, A., S.U. Ajmal, M. Munir, M. Zubair and M.S. Masood. 2008. Genetic diversity for morpho-genetic traits in barley germplasm. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40(3): 1217-1224.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
