Volume 10, Issue 28 (12-2018)                   jcb 2018, 10(28): 188-200 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadi S, Sorkhi Lalalo B, Rezaie M, Majidi A. Evaluation of Compatibility and Yield Potential of Barley Elite Lines under Full Irrigation and Low Water Stress Conditions in West Azerbaijan Province. jcb. 2018; 10 (28) :188-200
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-780-en.html
Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization
Abstract:   (619 Views)

Identification and introduce of high potential and water deficit stress tolerant is one of effective methods that caused to economic production beside other methods of water deficit management. In order to identification of barley lines, 9 barley elite lines and Bahman variety (check) studied under full irrigation and water deficit stress conditions in season cropping years 2013-2015. The results of combined variance analysis showed that the interaction effect, line × year was significant for grain yield. Under full irrigation condition, in first year, significant difference between Bahman (check) variety with other assessed lines was not seen, but in second year, the highest grain yield was belong to line no. 5 (6.81 t.ha-1), that showed significant difference with Bahman variety. Under water deficit stress, in first year, Bahman variety showed the highest grain yield (4.80 t.ha-1) that was situated in same statistical group with lines no. 2, 3, 4, 5. 7 and 8. But in second year, the highest grain yield was belong to line no. 9 (Jolgeh) with 5.18 t.ha-1. Results of two years mean for grain yield showed under full irrigation condition, lines no. 3, 4, 5, 7, 9 (Jolgeh) and 10 (Mahtab variety) had grain yield by 10-35% greater than Bahman variety. Under water deficit stress comparison with the full irrigation condition, promising lines no. 2 and 7 by 15% and 19% respectively, had atleast reduction grain yield among studied barley genotypes. The path analysis result showed that under full irrigation condition, traits flag leaf photosynthesis and biomass had a positive and significant direct effect on grain yield, while traits spike weight and grain number per spike had a negative and significant direct effect on grain yield. On the other hand, traits 1000 grain weight and grain number per spike had a positive and negative significant direct effect on grain yield under water deficit stress condition, respectively. Finally, based on the ranking of assessed lines, we can recommend the elite lines no. 5 and 10 (Mahtab variety) for full irrigation condition, line no. 7 for water deficit stress condition and line no. 9 (Jolgeh) for both conditions.
 

Full-Text [PDF 1247 kb]   (138 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/06/18 | Revised: 2019/03/2 | Accepted: 2017/12/12 | Published: 2019/03/2

References
1. Afzalifar, A., M. Zahravi and M. Bihamta. 2011. Evaluation of tolerant genotypes to drought stress in Karaj region. Agronomy and Plant Breeding Journal, 7(1): 25-44 (In Persian).
2. Akio, L., E. Okuyama and C. Rural. 2005. Plant to complement selection based on yield components dependent. Crop Production, 35(5): 190-196. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-84782005000500005]
3. Allah Gholipoor, M. and M.S. Mohammad Salehi. 2003. Factor and path analysis in different rice genotypes. Seed and plant Journal, 19(1): 76-87 (In Persian).
4. Alavi Sini, S.M. and J. Saba. 2015. Analysis of yield and yield components traits in twenty bread wheat genotypes under dryland conditions. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 40(2): 78-84.
5. Alavi Sini, S.M., J. Saba and J. Nasiri. 2013. Evaluation of some Physiological Traits in Drought Tolerant Lines of Bread Wheat in Rainfed Conditions. Seed and plant Journal, 24(4): 637-657 (In Persian).
6. Arunachalam, V. and A. Bandyopadhyay. 1984. A method to make decisions jointly on a number of dependent characters. Indian Journal of Genetics, 44: 419-424.
7. Blum, A. 2011. Plant breeding for water- limited environments. Springer-New York. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-7491-4]
8. Dadashi, M.R., A. Noorinia, M. Askar and Sh. Azizi. 2010. Evaluation of correlation between physiological and morphological traits with yield in hull- less barley lines. Journal of Crop and Weed Ecophysiology, 4(3): 29-40 (In Persian).
9. Derikvand, R. and T. Hossainpour. 2008. Path analysis of nektbarley genotypes in dryland condition. Sustainable management on tecnology, process, provide and uses of agriculture inputs seminar. Jan. 29th. Tehran (In Persian).
10. FAO. 2017. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E.
11. Faris, H., A. Merker, H. Singh, G. Belay and E. Johansson. 2006. Multivariate analysis of diversity of tetraploid wheat germplasm from Ethiopia. Journal of Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53: 1089-1098. [DOI:10.1007/s10722-005-9776-3]
12. Hosein Babaeei, A., S. Aharizad, S. Aboalghasem Mohammadi, M. Yarnia and M. Norouzi. 2013. Identification of effective traits on barley lines grain yield via path. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5(11): 49-58 (In Persian).
13. Iravani, M., M. Solouki, A.M. Rezai, B.A. Siasar and S.A. Kohkan. 2008. Investigating the Diversity and Relationship between Agronomical Traits and Seed Yield in Barley Advanced lines Using Factor Analysis. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 12(45): 137-145 (In Persian).
14. Jabari, M., B.A. Siahsarv, Sh. Kohkan and F. Zolfaghari. 2011. Correlation and path analysis of morphological traits associated with grain yield in drought stress and nonstress conditions in barley. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 93: 112-119 (In Persian).
15. Karami, M., M.R. Bihamta, M.R. Naghavi and M. Mardi. 2005. Evaluation of drought tolerance in barley. Iranian, Journal Agriculture Science, 36(3): 547-560 (In Persian).
16. Koochaki, A. and M. Banayan. 1994. Crop yield physiology. Jahad Mashhad press. 380 pp (In Persian).
17. Mahdavi, A.M., B. Sorkhi Lalehloo, S. Ahmadi and H. Zare Manesh. 2012. Evaluation of drought tolerance of barley genotypes using drought stress indices. Crop Science, 4(2): 31-39.
18. Mazandarani, T., M. Karimi and H. Nikkhah. 2004. Evaluation of resistance of barley genotypes to water stress after flowering. 8th Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. Faculty of Agriculture, Guilan University (In Persian).
19. Muurinen, S., G.A. Slafer and P. Peltonen-Sainio. 2006. Breeding Effects on Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Spring Cereals under orthern Conditions. Crop Science, 46: 561-568. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005-05-0046]
20. Nasri, R., F. Paknejad, M. Sadeghi shoaa, S. Ghorbani and Z. Fatemi. 2012. Correlation and path analysis of drought stress on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in Karaj region. Agronomy and plant breeding Journal, 8(4): 155-165 (In Persian).
21. Nikkhah, H. R., M.R. Naghavi, V. Mohammadi and H. Soltanloo. 2014. Physiological and Agronomic Traits Related to Drought Tolerance in Barley Recombinant Inbred Line Population (Arigashar ×Igri). Seed and plant improvement Journal, 30(4): 821-840 (In Persian).
22. Pour Mohammad, A.R., M. Moghadam, S.A. Mohammadi and A. Yousofi. 2009. Genetic diversity of hulless barley lines and path analysis on seed yield and other agronomic traits. Journal of Agriculture, 1(11): 21-34.
23. Reynolds, M.P., C.S. Pierre, A.S.I. Saad, M. Vargas and A.G. Condon. 2007. Evaluation potentioal genetic grains in wheat associated with stress-adaptive trait expression in elite genetic resources under drought and heatstress. Crop Science, 47: 172-189. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0022IPBS]
24. Saiedi, M. 2003. Multivariate analysis of yield and it's component in Barley. A Ms.c thesis, University of Zabol, Agronomy Faculty (In Persian).
25. Shahmoradi, S., S. Shafaoddin and A. Yousefi. 2011. Phenotypic Diversity in Barley Ecotypes of Arid- zone of Iran. Seed and plant improvement Journal. 27(4): 495-515 (In Persian).
26. Soleimani, A., M. Valizadeh, R. Darvishzadeh, S. Aharizad and H. Alipour. 2017. Evaluation of yield and yield component of spring barely genotypes under late. Journal of Crop Breeding. 5(11): 105-116 (In Persian).
27. Tajalli, H., G.H.R. Mosavi, R. Baradaran and M.H. Saberi. 2011. The study of promising genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgaris L.) under end of season drought stress conditions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Science, 4(2): 173-177 (In Persian).
28. Vijendra Das, L.D. 2000. Problems Facing Plant Breeding. CBS Publishers and Distributors, 242 pp.
29. Yazdi Samadi, B., A.M. Rezaei and M. Valizadeh. 2013. Statistical designs in agricultural research. Tehran press (In Persian).
30. Zakova, M. and M. Benkova. 2004. Genetic diversity of genetic resources of winter barley maintained in the gene bank in Slovakia. Czech Journal Genetics Plant Breeding, 40(4): 118-126. [DOI:10.17221/3709-CJGPB]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb