1. Abdulahi, A., R. Mohammadi and S.S. Pourdad. 2007. Evaluation of safflower (Carthamus spp.) genotypes in multi-environment trials by nonparametric methods. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 6: 827-832. [
DOI:10.3923/ajps.2007.827.832]
2. Aberkane, H., A. Amri, B. Belkadi, A. Filali-Maltouf, J. Valkoun and Z. Kehel. 2021. Contribution of Wild Relatives to Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) Yield Stability across Contrasted Environments. Agronomy, 11(10): 1992. [
DOI:10.3390/agronomy11101992]
3. Akcura, M. and Y. Kaya. 2008. Nonparametric stability methods for interpreting genotype by environment interaction of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(4): 906-913. [
DOI:10.1590/S1415-47572008005000004]
4. Akçura, M., Y. Kaya and S. Taner. 2005. Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability analysis for grain yield of durum wheat in the Central Anatolian Region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29(5): 369-375.
5. Alizadeh, B., A. Rezaizad, M. Yazdandoost Hamedani, G. Shiresmaeili, F. Nasserghadimi and H. R. Khademhamzeh. 2021. Investigation of genotype× environment interaction and seed yield stability of rapeseed genotypes in cold and mild cold regions of Iran. Plant Genetic Researches, 7(2): 65-82. [
DOI:10.52547/pgr.7.2.6]
6. Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype x environment interactions: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. Food & Agriculture Org.
7. Anonymous. 2020. Agriculture-Iran-Statistics.https://www.maj.ir/Dorsapax/userfiles/Sub65/Amarnamehj1-97-98-site.pdf
8. Anonymous. 2020. Agriculture-Iran-Statistics.
9. Baker, R. 1988. Tests for crossover genotype-environmental interactions. Canadian Journal of plant science, 68(2): 405-410. [
DOI:10.4141/cjps88-051]
10. Becker, H. and J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101(1): 1-23. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x]
11. Duraisam, R., K. Salelgn and A. K. Berekete. 2017. Production of beet sugar and bio-ethanol from sugar beet and it bagasse: a review. Int J Eng Trends Technol, 43(4): 222-233. [
DOI:10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V43P237]
12. Ebadi-Segherloo, A., S. H. Sabaghpour, H. Dehghani and M. Kamrani. 2008. Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica, 162(2): 221-229. [
DOI:10.1007/s10681-007-9552-x]
13. Eberhart, S. and W. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop Science, 6(1): 36-40. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x]
14. FAO. 2021. Plant production and area harvested.
15. Farshadfar, E. 1997. Application of quantitative genetics in plant breeding., Kermanshah, Iran, Taq Bostan Publications, 381 pp.
16. Farshadfar, E., S. H. Sabaghpour and H. Zali. 2012. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for selecting stable chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under diverse environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(3): 514-524.
17. Finlay, K. and G. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(6): 742-754. [
DOI:10.1071/AR9630742]
18. Flores, F., M. Moreno and J. Cubero. 1998. A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G× E interaction. Field crops research, 56(3): 271-286. [
DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6]
19. Fox, P., B. Skovmand, B. Thompson, H.-J. Braun and R. Cormier. 1990. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica, 47(1): 57-64. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00040364]
20. Francis, T. and L. Kannenberg. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58(4): 1029-1034. [
DOI:10.4141/cjps78-157]
21. Freeman, G. and J. M. Perkins. 1971. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability VIII. Relations between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity, 27(1): 15-23. [
DOI:10.1038/hdy.1971.67]
22. Hashim, N., M. Y. Rafii, Y. Oladosu, M. R. Ismail, A. Ramli, F. Arolu and S. Chukwu. 2021. Integrating multivariate and univariate statistical models to investigate genotype-environment interaction of advanced fragrant rice genotypes under rainfed condition. Sustainability, 13(8): 4555. [
DOI:10.3390/su13084555]
23. Huehn, M. 1990. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1: Theory. Euphytica, 47(3): 189-194. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00024241]
24. Hühn, M. and J. Léon. 1995. Nonparametric analysis of cultivar performance trials: experimental results and comparison of different procedures based on ranks. Agronomy journal, 87(4): 627-632. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700040004x]
25. Kang, M. 2004. Breeding: genotype by environment interaction. In 'Encyclopedia of plant and crop science'.(Ed. RM Goodman). Marcel Dekker: New York, 218-221 pp. [
DOI:10.1081/E-EPCS-120010525]
26. Kang, M. and J. Miller. 1984. Genotype✕ environment interactions for cane and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding 1. Crop Science, 24(3): 435-440. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400030002x]
27. Kang, M.S. 1991. Modified rank-sum method for selecting high yielding, stable crop genotypes. Cereal Research Communications: 361-364.
28. Kang, M.S. 1997. Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Advances in agronomy, 62(1): 199-252. [
DOI:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60569-6]
29. Karimizadeh, R., A. Asghari, O. Sofalian, K. Shahbazi, T. Hosseinpour, H. Ghojogh and M. Armion. 2019. Identification of the most stable durum wheat genotypes using nonparametric yield stability statistics. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 9(1): 189-203. [
DOI:10.29252/jcpp.9.1.189]
30. Kaya, Y. and S. Taner. 2003. Estimating genotypic ranks by nonparametric stability analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 4(1): 47-54.
31. Kaya, Y. and M. Turkoz. 2015. Evaluation of genotype by environment interaction for grain yield in durum wheat using non-parametric stability statistics. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(1): 134-144. [
DOI:10.17557/tjfc.48198]
32. Kilic, H., M. AKÇURA and H. AKTAŞ. 2010. Assessment of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in multi-environments. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38(3): 271-279.
33. Kunz, M., D. Martin and H. Puke. 2002. Precision of beet analyses in Germany explained for polarization. Zuckerindustrie, 127(1): 13-21.
34. Leiva-Eriksson, N., P.A. Pin, T. Kraft, J.C. Dohm, A.E. Minoche, H. Himmelbauer and L. Bülow. 2014. Differential Expression Patterns of Non-Symbiotic Hemoglobins in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris). Plant and Cell Physiology, 55(4): 834-844. [
DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcu027]
35. Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns and L.P. Lefkovitch. 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? 1. Crop Science, 26(5): 894-900. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x]
36. Lu, H.Y. 1995. PC‐SAS program for estimating Hühn's nonparametric stability statistics. Agronomy Journal, 87(5): 888-891. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700050018x]
37. McMichael, B. and J. Quisenberry. 1993. The impact of the soil environment on the growth of root systems. Environmental and experimental botany, 33(1): 53-61. [
DOI:10.1016/0098-8472(93)90055-K]
38. Mohammadi, R., A. Abdulahi, R. Haghparast, M. Aghaee and M. Rostaee. 2007. Nonparametric methods for evaluating of winter wheat genotypes in multi-environment trials. World J. Agric. Sci, 3(2): 137-242.
39. Mohammadi, R. and A. Amri. 2008. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica, 159(3): 419-432. [
DOI:10.1007/s10681-007-9600-6]
40. Mohammadi, S.A. 2001. Analysis of genetic diversity in indian maize inbred lines using microsatellite markers a thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute; New Delhi.
41. Monteiro, F., L. Frese, S. Castro, M.C. Duarte, O.S. Paulo, J. Loureiro and M.M. Romeiras. 2018. Genetic and genomic tools to asssist sugar beet improvement: the value of the crop wild relatives. Frontiers in plant science, 9: 74-90. [
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2018.00074]
42. Movahhedi, Z., H. Dehghani and M. Mofidian. 2010. A study of yield stability in cold region ecotypes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) through non-parametric measures. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 40(4): 103-111.
43. Nassar, R. and M. Huehn. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 1: 45-53. [
DOI:10.2307/2531947]
44. Noruzi, E. and A. Ebadi. 2015. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for analysing genotype× environment interactions in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) inbred lines. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(4): 959-979.
45. Pardo, A., M. Amato and F.Q. Chiarandà. 2000. Relationships between soil structure, root distribution and water uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant growth and water distribution. European Journal of Agronomy, 13(1): 39-45. [
DOI:10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00056-3]
46. Perkins, J.M. and J. Jinks. 1968. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 23(3): 356-359. [
DOI:10.1038/hdy.1968.48]
47. Pinthus, M.J. 1973. Estimate of genotypic value: A proposed method. Euphytica, 22(1): 121-123. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00021563]
48. Raiger, H. and V. Prabhakaran. 2001. A study on the performance of a few non-parametric stability measures using pearl-millet data. Indian J. Genet, 61(1): 7-11.
49. Ranji, Z., M. Mesbah, R. Amiri and S. Vahedi. 2005. Study on the efficiency of AMMI method and pattern analysis for determination of stability in sugar beet varieties. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 7(1): 1-20.
50. Ribeiro, I.C., C. Pinheiro, C.M. Ribeiro, M.M. Veloso, M.C. Simoes-Costa, I. Evaristo, O.S. Paulo and C.P. Ricardo. 2016. Genetic diversity and physiological performance of Portuguese wild beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from three contrasting habitats. Frontiers in plant science, 7: 1293. [
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.01293]
51. Romagosa, I. and P. Fox. 1993. Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation. p. 373-390. MD Hayward et al.(ed.) Plant breeding: Principles and prospects. Chapman and Hall, London. Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation. p. 373-390. In MD Hayward et al.(ed.) Plant breeding: Principles and prospects. Chapman and Hall, London. [
DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-1524-7_23]
52. Rommer, T. 1917. Sind die ertragreicheren sorten ertragssicherer. DGL-Mitt, 32(1): 87-89.
53. Roustaei, M., M. Moghaddam and S. Mahfozi. 1996. Comparison of methods for estimating stability parameters for selection in stable and high yielding wheat and barley cultivars in Iranian drylands. Isfahan University of Technology, 159 p.
54. Sabaghnia, N., H. Dehghani and S.H. Sabaghpour. 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype× environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Science, 46(3): 1100-1106. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0122]
55. Shukla, G. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29(2): 237-245. [
DOI:10.1038/hdy.1972.87]
56. Signor, C.E.L., S. Dousse, J. Lorgeou, J.B. Denis, R. Bonhomme, P. Carolo and A. Charcosset. 2001. Interpretation of genotype× environment interactions for early maize hybrids over 12 years. Crop Science, 41(3): 663-669. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.413663x]
57. Tardieu, F. 2013. Plant response to environmental conditions: assessing potential production, water demand, and negative effects of water deficit. Frontiers in physiology, 4(17): 1-11. [
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2013.00017]
58. Temesgen, T., G. Keneni, T. Sefera and M. Jarso. 2015. Yield stability and relationships among stability parameters in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes. The crop journal, 3(3): 258-268. [
DOI:10.1016/j.cj.2015.03.004]
59. Thennarasu, K. 1995. On Certain Non-Parametric Procedures For Studying Genotype-Environmentinteractions. And Yield Stability. IARI, Division of Agricultural Statistics: New Delhi.
60. Wricke, G. 1692. Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite in Feldverzuchen. Z. pflanzenzuchtg, 47: 92-96.
61. Zali, H., E. Farshadfar, S.H. Sabaghpour and R. Karimizadeh. 2012. Evaluation of genotype× environment interaction in chickpea using measures of stability from AMMI model. Annals of Biological Research, 3(7): 3126-3136.