Volume 11, Issue 29 (3-2019)
jcb 2019, 11(29): 104-116 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
motamedi M, safari P. (2019). Evaluation of Water Deficient Stress Tolerance in some Wheat Cultivars and Their Hybrids using Canonical Discriminant Analysis and Genotype by Trait Biplot. jcb. 11(29), 104-116. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.29.104
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-769-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-769-en.html
Islamic Azad University
Abstract: (2896 Views)
Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) in combination with cluster analysis and genotype by trait (GT) biplot analysis methods were used to assess 9 wheat cultivars having different degrees of tolerance along with 36 F1 hybrids derived from partial diallel crosses, using stress tolerance indices, in two levels (well watered and cessation of irrigation at pollination stage). Cluster analysis classified genotypes into three clusters and the results used to CDA as classifying variable. The first canonical variable was under the influence of high canonical coefficients for STI, HM, MP, GMP, Yp and Ys. Canonical coefficients for SSI and TOL in the second canonical variable were remarkable. The first canonical variable differentiated genotypes based on yield potential and stress tolerance and the second canonical variable distinguished stress tolerant genotypes from the sensitive ones. The scatter plot of two significant canonical variables characterized three distinct groups and all pairwise Mahalanobis distances among groups were significant. The genotypes in group 1 had high yield in stress and non-stress conditions and the genotypes of group 3 had more stress tolerance and less susceptibility to stress. To identify tolerant and high yielding genotypes in both stress and non- stress conditions, GT biplot analysis based on combination of STI and SSI was used and superior genotypes which simultaneously have higher yield potential and stress tolerance were introduced.
Keywords: Canonical discriminant analysis, Drought tolerance indices, Genotype by trait biplot, Wheat
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2017/05/28 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2018/08/7 | Published: 2019/05/8
Received: 2017/05/28 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2018/08/7 | Published: 2019/05/8
References
1. Abdi, H. and M.T. Mazandarani. 2016. Study of drought tolerance in bread wheat cultivars using biplot. International Journal of Life-Sciences Scientific Research, 2(6): 651-657. [DOI:10.21276/ijlssr.2016.2.6.2]
2. Abdolshahi, R., M. Nazari, A. Safarian, T.S. Sadathossini, M. Salarpour and H. Amiri. 2015. Integrated selection criteria for drought tolerance in wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) breeding programs using discriminant analysis. Field Crops Research, 174: 20-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.009]
3. Clarke, J.M., R.M. DePauw and T.F. Townley-Smith. 1992. Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 32(3): 723-728. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200030029x]
4. Cruz-Castillo, J.G., S. Ganeshanandam, B.R. MacKay, G.S. Lawes, C.R.O. Lawoko and D.J. Woolley. 1994. Applications of canonical discriminant analysis in horticultural research. Horticultural Science, 29(10): 1115-1119. [DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.29.10.1115]
5. Dillon, W.R. and M. Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate analysis: methods and applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York
6. Farshadfar, E., B. Jamshidi and M. Aghaee. 2012. Biplot analysis of drought tolerance indicators in bread wheat landraces of Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4(5): 226-233.
7. Fernandez, G.C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, pp: 257-270.
8. Fischer, R.A. and R. Maurer. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Crop and Pasture Science, 29(5): 897-912. [DOI:10.1071/AR9780897]
9. Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons.
10. Henshaw, F.O., K.H. McWatters, J.O. Akingbala and Y.C. Hung. 2002. Functional characterization of flour of selected cowpea (Vignaunguiculata) varieties: canonical discriminant analysis. Food Chemistry, 79(3): 381-386. [DOI:10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00190-5]
11. Hossain, A.B.S., R.G. Sears, T.S. Cox and G.M. Paulsen. 1990. Desiccation tolerance and its relationship to assimilate partitioning in winter wheat. Crop Science, 30(3): 622-627. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030030x]
12. Loos, B.P. 1993. Morphological variation in Lolium (poacea) as a measure of species relationships. The genus Lolium; taxonomy and genetic resources. Plant Systematics and Evolution, (2): 23-35.
13. Mohammadnia, S., A. Asghari, O. Sofalian, H. MohammaddoustChamanabad, R. Karimizadeh and A.K. Shokouhian. 2016. Evaluation of durum wheat lines using drought stress indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20): 11-23.
14. Nezhadahmadi, A., Z.H. Prodhan and G. Faruq. 2013. Drought tolerance in wheat. The Scientific World Journal, 2013: 1-12. [DOI:10.1155/2013/610721]
15. Ramirez-Vallejo, P. and J.D. Kelly. 1998. Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica, 99(2): 127-136. [DOI:10.1023/A:1018353200015]
16. Rao, C.R. 2009. Linear statistical inference and its applications (Vol. 22). John Wiley & Sons.
17. Rascio, A., E. Carlino, G. Santis and N. Fonzo. 2012. A discriminant analysis to categorize durum wheat varieties in drought-tolerance classes on the basis of rheological and physiological traits. Cereal Research Communications, 41(1): 88-96. [DOI:10.1556/CRC.2012.0016]
18. Riggs, T.J. 1973. The use of canonical analysis for selection within a population of spring barley. Annals of Applied Biology, 74(2): 249-258. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1973.tb07745.x]
19. Rosielle, A.A. and J. Hamblin. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop science, 21(6): 943-946. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x]
20. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS user's guide: Statistics version 9 for windows. SAS Institute. Carry, NC.
21. Sayyah, S.S., M. Ghobadi, S. Mansoorifar and A.R. Zebarjadi. 2012. Evaluation of drought tolerant in some wheat genotypes to post-anthesis drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(11): 248-256. [DOI:10.5539/jas.v4n11p248]
22. Schneider, K.A., R. Rosales-Serna, F. Ibarra-Perez, B. Cazares-Enriquez, J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, P. Ramirez-Vallejo, N. Wassimi and J.D. Kelly. 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science, 37(1): 43-50. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010007x]
23. SPSS. 2007. The SPSS system for Windows. Release 16.0. SPSS Inc., an IBM Company Headquarters, USA.
24. Vaylay, R. and E. van Santen. 2002. Application of canonical discriminant analysis for the assessment of genetic variation in tall fescue. Crop Science, 42(2): 534-539. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.5340]
25. Winter, S.R., J.T. Musick and K.B. Porter. 1988. Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought-resistanct winter wheat. Crop science, 28(3): 512-516. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030018x]
26. Yan, W. 2014. Crop variety trials: data management and analysis. Wiley-Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781118688571]
27. Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for geneticists, breeders, and agronomists. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL. [DOI:10.1201/9781420040371]
28. Yan, W. and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario.Crop Science, 42(1): 11-20. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.1100]
29. Yeater, K.M., G.A. Bollero, D.G. Bullock, A.L. Rayburn and S. Rodriguez-Zas. 2004. Assessment of genetic variation in hairy vetch using canonical discriminant analysis. Crop Science, 44(1): 185-189. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.1850]
30. Zangi, M.R. 2005. Correlation between drought resistance indices and cotton yield in stress and non-stress conditions. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 4: 106-108. [DOI:10.3923/ajps.2005.106.108]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
