Volume 10, Issue 25 (6-2018)                   jcb 2018, 10(25): 28-35 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zahra Sadat Musavizadeh Z S M, Hamid Najafi Zarini H N Z, Seyyed Hamidreza Hashemi-Petroudi S H H, Seyyed Kamal Kazemitabar S K K. (2018). Assessment of Proline, Chlorophyll and Malondialdehyde in Sensitive and Tolerant Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars under Salt Stress Conditions. jcb. 10(25), 28-35. doi:10.29252/jcb.10.25.28
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-525-en.html
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
Abstract:   (3765 Views)

     Salinity stress is one of the main obstacles in crop production in many parts of the world, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Plants' ability to neutralize the effect of salinity largely depends on the internal state K+ and Na+. In fact, maintaining high K+/Na+ ratio in Cytosol is a key element for tolerance to salinity. Rice, one of the most important food crops, a primary food source for more than one-third of the world’s population.  Rice is sensitive to salinity stress, so that, salt effects will extensively damage rice metabolic activities. This study has presented the effects of salinity on some physiological characteristics and genes expression patterns that coded for a number of ion channels in rice.  In order to seed germination, the seeds of some cultivar (IR29, Sangtarom, and Jelodar) sterilized and then were placed in germinator. Salinity treatment (120 mM NaCl) were applied 14 days after culture. The leaf and root samples were collected at six time-courses (0, 6, 24, 72, 120 and 168 hours) after sodium chloride stress. Results of physiological assessments showed that the effects of genotype, sampling period and their interactions were significant at 1% level of probability on all measured traits including malondialdehyde (MDA), chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids and proline contents.  The concentration of chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid of leaves were reduced in early hours of encountering with stress and then increasing the hours of stress, leaf thickness (leaf rolling) caused chlorophyll per leaf unit and increases the amount of chlorophyll.  The measurement of MDA in the leaves showed that the greatest increase occurred in sensitive cultivar (IR29). Proline content analysis showed that there was no significant difference between proline content of sensitive and tolerant cultivars under normal condition (no stress), but by exposure to salinity stress, proline content was increased in susceptible more than tolerant cultivar. Proline content in Sangtaroom, as a salt tolerant genotype, has significantly increased in comparison with the control cultivar in 72, 120 and 168 (h) times. Consequently, the responses of sensitive and tolerant rice cultivars to the salinity stress are different from each other and measuring of some parameters such as MDA, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids, and proline can help to improve the salt tolerance of plants.
 

 

Full-Text [PDF 775 kb]   (1954 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/02/6 | Revised: 2018/07/7 | Accepted: 2016/12/24 | Published: 2018/07/8

References
1. Amirjani, M.R. 2011. Effect of salinity stress on growth, sugar content, pigments and enzyme activity of rice. Int J Bot, 7: 73-81 (In Persian). [DOI:10.3923/ijb.2011.73.81]
2. Asch, F., M. Dingkuhn and K. Dorffling. 2000. Salinity increases CO2 assimilation but reduces growth in field-grown, irrigated rice. Plant and Soil, 218: 1-10. [DOI:10.1023/A:1014953504021]
3. Bandeoğlu, E., F. Eyidoğan, M. Yücel and H.A. Öktem. 2004. Antioxidant responses of shoots and roots of lentil to NaCl-salinity stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 42: 69-77. [DOI:10.1023/B:GROW.0000014891.35427.7b]
4. Bates, L.S. 1973. Rapid determination of Free Proline for water- Stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207. [DOI:10.1007/BF00018060]
5. Bhattacharjee, S. and A.K. Mukherjee. 2002. Salt stress induced cytosolute accumulation, antioxidant response and membrane deterioration in three rice cultivars during early germination. Seed Science and Technology, 30: 279-287.
6. Boriboonkaset, T., C. Theerawitaya, N. Yamada, A. Pichakum, K. Supaibulwatana, S. Cha-um and C. Kirdmanee. 2013. Regulation of some carbohydrate metabolism-related genes, starch and soluble sugar contents, photosynthetic activities and yield attributes of two contrasting rice genotypes subjected to salt stress. Protoplasma, 250: 1157-1167. [DOI:10.1007/s00709-013-0496-9]
7. Heath, R.L. and L. Packer. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 125(1): 189-198. [DOI:10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1]
8. Jamil, M., S.A. Bashir, M.I.N.A. Anwar, S.O.M.A. Bibi, S.A.S.I.A. Bangash, F. Ullah and E.S. Rha. 2012. Effect of salinity on physiological and biochemical characteristics of different varieties of rice. Pak J Bot, 44: 7-13.
9. Kanawapee, N.J. Sanitchon, W. Lontom and P. Threerakulpisut. 2012. Evaluation of salt tolerance at the seedling stage in rice genotypes by growth performance, ion accumulation, proline and chlorophyll content. Plant and soil, 358: 235-249. [DOI:10.1007/s11104-012-1179-6]
10. Krishnamurthy, R., M. Anbazhagan and K.A. Bhagwat. 1987. Effect of NaCl toxicity chlorophyll breakdown in rice. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 57: 567-570.
11. Mekawy, A.M.M., D.V.M. Assaha, H. Yahagi, Y. Tada, A. Ueda and H. Saneoka. 2015. Growth, physiological adaptation, and gene expression analysis of two Egyptian rice cultivars under salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 87: 17-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.12.007]
12. Mohan, M.M., S.L. Narayanan and S.M. Ibrahim. 2000. Chlorophyll stability index (CSI): its impact on salt tolerance in rice. International Rice Research Notes, 25(2): 38-39.
13. Moradi, F. 2002. Physiological characterization of rice cultivars for salinity tolerance during vegetative and reproductive stages. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines, 190 pp (In Persian).
14. Moumeni, A. 2011. Geographical distribution and salinity of soil resources in Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 24: 203- 215 (In Persian).
15. Munns, R., R.A. James and A. Läuchli. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of experimental botany, 57(5): 1025-1043. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erj100]
16. Orcutt, D.M. and E.T. Nilsen. 2000. The physiology of plants under stress: soil and biotic factors (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY, USA. 684 pp.
17. Papp, J.C., M.C. Ball and N. Terry. 1983. A comparative study of the effects of NaCl salinity on respiration, photosynthesis, and leaf extension growth in Beta vulgaris L. (Sugar beet). Plant, Cell and Environment, 6: 675-677. [DOI:10.1111/1365-3040.ep11589273]
18. Pardo, J.M. 2010. Biotechnology of water and salinity stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Biotech, 21: 185-196. [DOI:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.02.005]
19. Parida, A.K. and A.B. Das. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 60: 324-349. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010]
20. Patakas, A., N. Nikolaou, E. Zioziou, K. Radoglou and B. Noitsakis. 2002. The role of organic solute and ion accumulation in osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines. Plant Science, 163: 361-367. [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00140-1]
21. Porra, R.J. 2002. The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynthesis Research, 73: 149-156.
22. Rauf, M., M. Munir, M. Hassan, M. Ahmad and M. Afzal. 2007. Performance of wheat genotypes under osmotic stress at germination and early seedling growth stage. African journal of biotechnology, 6 -8 pp.
23. Saeedpour, S. 2015. Effect of salinity on growth, chlorophyll content and ions uptake of rice cultivars (Oryza sativa) cultivars. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi), 102: 2-11 (In Persian).
24. Senguttuvel, P., C. Vijayalakshmi, K. Thiyagarajan, J.R. Kannanbapu, S. Kota, G. Padmavathi and B.C. Viraktamath. 2014. Changes in photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, gas exchange parameters and osmotic potential to salt stress during early seedling stage in rice (Oryza sativa L). SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 46: 120-135.
25. Sudhakar, C., P.S. Reddy and K. Veeranjaneyulu. 1993. Effect of salt stress on the enzymes of proline synthesis and oxidation in greengram (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.) seedlings. Journal of plant physiology, 141: 621-623. [DOI:10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80466-9]
26. Summart, J., P. Thanonkeo, S. Panichajakul, P. Prathepha and M.T. McManus. 2010. Effect of salt stress on growth, inorganic ion and proline accumulation in Thai aromatic rice, Khao Dawk Mali 105, callus culture. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(2).
27. Wu, T., W. Lin Kao and C.H. Hong. 2015. Gene knockout of glutathione reductase 3 results in increased sensitivity to salt stress in rice. Plant Molecular Biology, Volume 87, Issue, 6: 555-564. [DOI:10.1007/s11103-015-0290-5]
28. Yamchi, A., F.R. Jazii, C. Ghobadi, A. Mousavi and A.A. Karkhanehee. 2005. Increasing of tolerance to osmotic stresses in tobacco Nicotiana tabacum cv. xanthi through overexpression of p5cs gene. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology, 8: 31-40 (In Persian).
29. Yoshida, S., D.A. Forno, J.H. Cook and K.A. Gomez. 1976. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, pp: 61-65.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb