Volume 11, Issue 30 (9-2019)
jcb 2019, 11(30): 98-107 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
majidian P, masoudi B, sadeghi garmarodi H. (2019). Preliminary Evaluation of Imported Cultivars and Pure Lines of Soybean(Glycine Max L.). Based on Agronomic Traits and Resistance to Phytophthota Rot. jcb. 11(30), 98-107. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.30.98
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1001-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1001-en.html
agricultural research, education and extension organization
Abstract: (2257 Views)
In order to preliminary evaluation based on important agronomic traits, 54 soybean pure lines and cultivars were assessed according to augmented design with three control cultivars including Williams, Kosar and Sahar at Seed and Plant Improvement Institute at Karaj in 1395. During the growth period, important agricultural characters such as plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, number of branches per plant and dates of emergence, flowering, podding, maturity and harvesting were recorded. The grain yield, 100 seed weight and seed oil percentage were determined after harvest. Based on the results of coefficient of variation (%) of imported genotypes in Karaj region, the highest amount of phenotypic variation was related to the number of empty pods (99.08), number of pods in ranches (83.12), number of seeds per plant (72.73) and number of pods per plant (66.68) and the lowest phenotypic variation coefficient related to oil percentage (11.77), number of days to maturity (14.94) and number of days until grain filling (18.9). The studied genotypes were classified into four groups based on cluster analysis for all agronomic traits. In addition, the investigation of pure lines and cultivars of imported soybean in terms of response to Phytophthora disease showed that among the 54 genotypes, 22 genotypes had a semi-resistant and resistant reaction. The results of clustering on the basis of resistance to Phytophthora rot divided cultivars in two main groups and four subgroups. In total, it should be suggested that cultivars of Winchester, Beeson 80, Amcor 89, Beeson, L75-3735, L77-1794, Oak land showed high single-plant seed yield and resistance to Phytophthora which could be used in future breeding programs.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2018/10/12 | Revised: 2019/12/29 | Accepted: 2019/03/9 | Published: 2019/09/11
Received: 2018/10/12 | Revised: 2019/12/29 | Accepted: 2019/03/9 | Published: 2019/09/11
References
1. Adie, M.M. and A. Krisnawati. 2017. Characterization and clustering of agronomic characters of several soybean genotypes. Nusantara Bioscience, 9(3): 237-242. [DOI:10.13057/nusbiosci/n090301]
2. Arshad, M., N. Ali and A. Ghafoor. 2006. Character correlation and path coefficient in soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38(1): 121.
3. Ayobi, N., D. zafari and M. Mirabolfathi. 2010. Effect of Trichoderma species on zoospore production of Phytophthora sojae, disease severity, and gluconase enzymes activity assay. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology, 46(3): 203-215.
4. Babaee, H.R., H. Zeinali Khanghah and E.R. Taremi. 2010. Genetic analysis of agronomic traits and seed shattering in soybean (Glycine max L.). Seed and Plant Journal, 28(4).
5. Bello, L.L., A. Shaahu and T. Vange. 2012. Studies on relationship between seed yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 3(4): 1012-1017.
6. Dos Santos, J.V.M., B. Valliyodan, T. Joshi, S.M. Khan, Y. Liu, J. Wang, T.D. Vuong, M.F. de Oliviera, F.C. Marcelino-Guimarães, D. Xu, H.T. Nguyen and R.V. Abdelnoor. 2016. Evaluation of genetic variation among Brazilian soybean cultivars through genome resequencing. BMC Genomics, 17(1): 110. [DOI:10.1186/s12864-016-2431-x]
7. Fazeli, F., H. Najafi Zarini, M. Arefrad and A.Z. Mirabadi. 2015. Assessment of relation of morphological traits with seed yield and their diversity in M4 Generation of soybean mutant lines [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] through factor analysis. Journal of Crop Breeding, 7(15): 47-56.
8. Hosseinpor, H., O. Alishah, A. Mohammadi and E. Hezarjaribi. 2011. Correlation analysis of agronomic traits, morphological and phonological 30 soybean lines Golestan Province. Journal of Crop Breeding, 7: 1-10.
9. Khan, M.S.A., M.A. Karim, M.M. Haque, A.J.M.S. Karim and M.A.K. Mian. 2014. Variations in agronomic traits of Soybean genotypes. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 12(2): 90-100. [DOI:10.3329/sja.v12i2.21921]
10. Liu, F.L., C.R. Jensen and M.N. Andersen. 2004. Pot set related to photosynthetic rate and endogenous ABA in soybean subject to different water regimes and exogenous ABA and BA at early reproductive stages. Annals of Botany, 94: 405-411. [DOI:10.1093/aob/mch157]
11. Malek, M.A., M.Y. Rafii, S.S. Afroz, U.K. Nath and M. Mondal. 2014. Morphological characterization and assessment of genetic variability, character association, and divergence in soybean mutants. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: 1-12. [DOI:10.1155/2014/968796]
12. Malik, M.F.A., M. Ashraf, A.S. Qureshi and M.R. Khan. 2011. Investigation and comparison of some morphological traits of the soybean populations using cluster analysis. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43(2): 1249-1255.
13. Masoudi, B., M.R. Bihamta, H.R. Babaee and S.A. Peighambari. 2008. Evaluation of genetic diversity for agronomic, morphological and phenological traits in soybean. Seed and Plant Journal, 24(3): 413-427.
14. Mohammadi, A., A. Alizadeh, J. Mozafari, M. Mirabolfathi and N. Noras Mofrad. 2014. Genetic diversity of Phytophthora Sojae in Iran. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2(11): 2756-2760. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2008.302.305]
15. Qin, J., Q. Song, A. Shi, S. Li, M. Zhang and B. Zhang. 2017. Genome-wide association mapping of resistance to Phytophthora sojae in a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Germplasm panel from maturity groups IV and V. PloS One, 12(9): 184-613. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0184613]
16. Rame, V.O. 2010. Evaluation of genetic variation and correlation among yield and yield components in soybean genotypes using multivariate analysis. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5(2): 57-67.
17. Sadeghi Garmaroodi, H., M. Mirabolfathy, H. Babai and H. Zeinali. 2010. Physiologic races of Phytophthora soja in Iran and race specific reaction of some soybean cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 9: 243-249.
18. Sohn, H.B., S.J. Kim, T.Y. Hwang, H.M. Park, Y.Y. Lee, K. Markkandan, D. Lee., S. Lee, S.Y. Hong, B.C. Koo and Y.H. Kim. 2017. Barcode system for genetic identification of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] cultivars using InDel markers specific to dense variation blocks. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8: 520. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2017.00520]
19. Sugimoto, T., M. Kato, S. Yoshida, I. Matsumoto, T. Kobayashi, A. Kaga, M. Hajika, R. Yamamoto, K. Watanabe, M. Aino, T. Matoh, D.R. Walker, A.R. Biggs and M. Ishimoto. 2012. Pathogenic diversity of Phytophthora sojae and breeding strategies to develop Phytophthora-resistant soybeans. Breeding Science, 61(5): 511-522. [DOI:10.1270/jsbbs.61.511]
20. Zhou, X., T.E. Carter, Z. Cui, S. Miyazaki and J.W. Burton. 2002. Genetic diversity patterns in Japanese soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Science, 42(4): 1331-1342.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
