1. Aina, O.O., A.G.O. Dixon and E.A. Akinrinde. 2007. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis for yield of cassava in nigeria. Journal of Biological Science, 7: 796-800. [
DOI:10.3923/jbs.2007.796.800]
2. Anley, W., H. Zeleke and Y. Dessalegn. 2013. Genotype X environment interaction of maize (Zea mays L.) across North Western Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 5 (9): 171-181. [
DOI:10.5897/JPBCS2013.0406]
3. Croosa, J., H. G. Gauch and R. W. Zobell. 1990. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of international maize cultivar trials. Crop Science, 30: 493-500. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030003x]
4. Dohlert, D.C., M.S. Mc Mullen and J.I. Hammond. 2001. Genotypic and environmental effects on grain yield and quality of oat grown in North Dakota. Crop Science, 41: 1066-1072. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.4141066x]
5. Ebdon, J.S. and H.G. Gauch. 2002. AMMI analysis of national turfgrass performance trials. II. Genotype recommendation. Crop Science, 42: 497-506. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.4970]
6. Farshadfar, E. 2008. In corporation of AMMI stability value and Grain yield in a single Non- parametric Index (GSI) in Bread wheat. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 11(14): 1791-1796. [
DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2008.1791.1796]
7. Farshadfar, E. 2010. New agument in biometery genetic. Islamic Azad university publication.
8. Farshadfar, E. 2015. The interaction effect of genotype and environment in plant breeding. first volume. Islamic Azad University Press. Kermanshah (In Persian).
9. Gauch, H.G. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional trials. AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 287 pp.
10. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science. 46: 1488-1500. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193]
11. Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1989. Accuracy and selection success in yield trials analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 77: 443-481. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00274266]
12. Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1996. AMMI analyses of yield trials. In Kang, M.S., and Gauch, H.G. (Eds.), Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC. Boca Raton, Florida, 85-122 pp. [
DOI:10.1201/9781420049374.ch4]
13. Ghodrati-Niari, F. and R. Abdolshahi. 2014. Evaluation of yield stability of 40 bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(4): 322-333 (In Persian).
14. Grafius, J.E. and R.L. Thomas. 1971. The case for indirect genetic control of sequential traits and the strategy of deployment of environmental resources by the palm. Heredity, 27: 433-442. [
DOI:10.1038/hdy.1971.54]
15. Homma, S. 2015. AMMI, Stability and GGE Biplot Analysis of Durum Wheat Grain Yield for Genotypes Tested under Some Optimum and High Moisture Areas of Ethiopia. Academic Journal of Entomology, 8(3): 132-139.
16. Jalal Kamali, M.R. 2008. Reviewal on wheat Situation in Past, Present and Future World. Key Articles TenTh Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences in Iran, 23-45 (In Persian).
17. Kilic, H. 2014. Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interactions (AMMI) Analysis of Grain Yield in Barley Genotypes across Environments. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20: 337-344. [
DOI:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001292]
18. Mohammadi, R., R. Haghparast, A. Amri and S. Ceccarelli. 2010. Yield stability of rainfed durum wheat and GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment trials. Crop and Pasture Science, 61: 92-101. [
DOI:10.1071/CP09151]
19. Nachit, M.M., G. Nachit, H. Ketata, H.G. Gauch and R.W. Zobel. 1992. use of AMMI and linear regression models to analyze genotype- environments interaction in Durum wheat. Theoretical and Applies Genetics. 83: 597-601. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00226903]
20. Najafian, G., A.K. Kaffashi and A. Jafar-Nezhad. 2010. Analysis of grain yield stability in hexaploid wheat genotypes grown in temperate regions of Iran using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction. Journal Agricultural Science Technology, 12: 213-222.
21. Purchase, J.L. 1997. Parametric analysis to describe G x E interaction and yield stability in winter wheat. Ph. D. Thesis. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
22. Romagosa, M. and P.N. Fox. 1993. Integration of statistical and physiological adaptation in barley cultivars. Theorical and Applied Genetics, 86: 822-826. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00212607]
23. Roustaei, M., D. Sadegh Zadeh Ahari, A. Hesami, K. Soleimani, H. Pashapour, K. Nader Mahmoudi, M.M. Pour Siyah Bidi, M.M. Ahmadi, M. Hasanpour Hasani and Gh. Abedi Asl. 2003. Checking compatibility and performance stableness of, bread wheat genotypes in cold and temperate Dry regions. Journal of Plant and Seed, (2): 263-280 (In Persian).
24. Taherian, M., M.R. Bihamta, S.A. Peyghambari, H. Alizadeh and A. Rasoulnia. 2018. Stability Analysis and Selection of Salinity Tolerant barley Genotypes. Crop Breeding, 11(29): 93-103 (In Persian). [
DOI:10.29252/jcb.11.29.93]
25. Tarinejad, A. 2017. Grain yield stability of some bread wheat cultivars introduced in moderate and cold area of Iran. Journal of Ecophysiology, 11(2): 437-452 (In Persian).
26. Van Eeuwijk, F.F. 1992. Multiplicative models for genotype x environment interaction in plant breeding. Statistical Application, 393-406.
27. Vargas, W., J. Crossa, F.A. Van Eeuwijk, K. Sayre and M.P. Reynolds. 2001. Interpreting treatment and environment interaction in agronomy trials. Agronomy Journal, 93: 946-960. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj2001.934949x]
28. Yan, W. and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41: 656-663. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.41119x]