Volume 11, Issue 29 (3-2019)
J Crop Breed 2019, 11(29): 85-92 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghanbari S, Nooshkam A, Fakheri B A, Mahdinezhad N. (2019). Relationship between Yield and its Component in Soybean Genotypes (Glycine Max L.) using Multivariate Statistical Methods . J Crop Breed. 11(29), 85-92. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.29.85
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-966-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-966-en.html
1- University of zabol
2- Company of martyr Beheshti
2- Company of martyr Beheshti
Abstract: (3670 Views)
18 soybean genotypes were examined to investigate the relationships between some principal attributions of morphology with seed yield per soybean, by Random Complete Block Design (RCBD) study. This study was also carried out three replicates to gain reliable results. The results of variance analysis indicated that, there were significance differences among all soybean genotypes. Moreover, the results of correlated analysis revealed that biological yield (0.96), harvest index (0.92), and number of branches (0.92) had the uttermost correlation with seed yield. To data factor analysis, four independent variables justified 99.92 percent of all data. The first variable, seed yield, justified 96.71 percent of entire variance. Multiple-Regression Model with method Analytical Regression Model (step-by-step) was utilized to examine soybean seed yield. This model proved that number of branches entered into model and justified 85.20 percent of variation of seed yield. A correlated coefficient of considered attributions was equal 0.92 and these indexes had significant at 1% in statistical process. Therefore, these traits can be notability used in soybean breeding programs. Also, accordance to cluster analysis, the sample was divided into three groups.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2018/05/17 | Accepted: 2018/08/18
Received: 2018/05/17 | Accepted: 2018/08/18
References
1. Acquah, G.M., W. Adams and J.D. Kelly. 1992. A factor analysis of plant variables associated with architeeture and seed size in dry bean-Euphytica, 60: 171-177.
2. Akhtar, M. and C.H. Sneller. 1996. Yield and yield components of early maturing soybean genotypes in the Hid- South. Crop Science, 36: 866-882. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X0036000400010x]
3. Alipour Yamchi, M., M.R. Bihamta, M. Peighambari, M.R. Naghavi and M. Shafiee khorshidi. 2011. Evaluation of genetic diversity and classification of Kabuli Chickpea Genotypes in late season drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 7: 53-70.
4. Bangar, N.D., G.D. Mukheka, D.B. Lad and D.G. Mukheka. 2003. Genetic variability, correlation and regression studies in soybean. Journal of Maharashtra Agriculture Universities, 28: 320-321.
5. Farahani Pad, P., F. Paknezhad, F. Fazeli, M.N. Ilikaei and M. Davodi Fard. 2012. Effect of planting date on dry matter and yield components in four soybean cultivars, journal of agronomy and plant breeding, 8(1): 203-212.
6. Ghorban zade neghab, M., H.R. Babaie, G. Rassam, A.L. Dadkhah and A. Khoshnood Yazdi. 2013. Response of Seed Yield Components, Protein and Oil Content of Soybean Cultivars to Various Sowing Date in Shirvan, Journal of crop improvement, 15(2): 31-41.
7. Ghorbanpour, A., A. Salemi, M.A. Tajik Ghanbary, H. Pirdashti and A. Dehbashi. 2017. Relationship between Fruit Yield and its Components in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Cultivars using Multivariate Statistical Methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(24): 22-29.
8. Henrico, S.B., G.P. Claudio, R. Pinto and D. Destro. 2004. Path analysis under multicollinearity in soybean. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 47: 669-676. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-89132004000500001]
9. Hymowitz, T. and N. Kaizuma. 2008. Dissemination of soybeans (Glycine max): Seed protein electrophoresis profiles among Japanese cultivars. Economic Botany, 10(1007): 311-319. [DOI:10.1007/BF02858260]
10. Iqbal, S., T. Mahmood, A.M. Anwar and M. Sarwar. 2003. Path coefficient analysis in different genotypes of soybean. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 6(12): 1085-1087. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2003.1085.1087]
11. Jian Jin, A., A. Xiaobing Liu, A. Guanghua Wang, A. Liang Mi, B. Zhongbao Shen, B. Xueli Chen, J. Stephen and C. Herbert. 2010. Agronomic and physiological contributions to the yield improvement of soybean cultivars released from 1950 to 2006 in Northeast China. Field Crops Res, 115:116-123. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.016]
12. Khan, A. and M. Hatam. 2000. Heritability and interrelationship among yield determining components of soybean varieties. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 116: 5-8.
13. Kohkan, H., A. Mohammadi, O. Alishah and E. Hezarjaribi. 2010. Study on Genetic and Phenotype Diversity and Factor analysis for Morpholigical and Phonolygecul Traits in Pure lines Soybean, Tehran, 185 pp.
14. Kumudini, S., D.J. Hume and G. Chu. 2002. Genetic improvements in short season soybean, nitrogen accumulation, remobilization and partitioning. Crop Science, 24: 141-145. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.1410]
15. Majidi Mehr, A. and H. Khosh Chehreh. 2015. Study of different genotypes of rice using multivariate analysis. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 9(30): 118-128.
16. Masudi, B., M.R. Bihamta, H.R. Babai and S.A. Peighambari. 2009. Evaluation of genetic variation for agronomic, morphological and phonological traits in soybean. Seed and plant, 24(3): 413-427 (In Persian).
17. Monthly oil industry. 2004. Oilseeds, 26-27.
18. Moqadam, M., A. Mohamadishuti and M. Aghayisarborze. 2004. Introduction to multivariate statistical methods (Translate). The leading publisher of science, 12: 58-70.
19. Namdari, M. and S. Mahmudi. 2013. Evaluation of grain yield and yield components in intercropping of dwarf and tall cultivars of soybean (Glycine max L.). Iranin Lahti Crop Science, 15(1): 1-11 (In Persian).
20. Narjesi, V., H. Zeinali Khangah and A.A. Zali. 2008. Evaluation of Genetic Diversity for Agronomic, Morphological and Phenological Traits in Soybean Journal of Science and Technology Agriculture and Natural Resources, 41: 227- 235 (In Persian).
21. Olser, R.D and J.L. Cartter. 2004. Effect of planting date on chemical composition and growth characteristics of soybean, 211-223.
22. Pedersen, P. and J.G. Lauer. 2004. Response of soybean yield components to management system and planting date. Agronomy Journal, 96: 1372-1381. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2004.1372]
23. 23-Rezaizad, A. 1999. An investigation on genetic diversity in soybean cultivars. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Tehran University, Karadj, Iran, 120pp (In Persian).
24. Sabokdast nodemi, M., H. Zeynali khanqah, F. Khialparast, M. Fazel and A. Rasulnia. 2010. A study of relationship between some important agronomic trait soybean using multivariate statistical methods. Agronomy Journal, 85: 48-49 (In Persian).
25. Safari, P., R. Honarnejad and M. Esfehani. 2008. Assessment of genetic variation in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars using Canonical Discriminant Analysis, Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 6(2): 327-334.
26. Top Fer, R., N. Martini and J. Schell. 1995. Modification of plant lipid synthesis. Science, 268: 681-686. [DOI:10.1126/science.268.5211.681]
27. Yahueian, H., M. Bihamta, H. Babaei and D. Habibi. 2010. Effects of water deficit on yield and yield components of soybean genotypes Phay. Crop Sciences Journal, 2(3-4): 159-168.
28. Yunesi hamze khanlu, A., A. Izadi, D.N. Piruli, B.M.T. Halajian and A. Majdabadi. 2010. Study of Relationship between Some Agro Morphological Traits with Yield in M7 Generation of Soybean Mutant lines Irradiated by Gamma Ray. Journal of Crop Breeding, 2(5): 30-46 (In Persian).
29. Zareh, M. 2011. Analysis of the data in the study of natural resources with the software SPSS. Publications University of Tehran, 249-251 (In Persian).
30. Zhao, J.G., W.M. Ghen, Z.L. Li and X.L. Li. 1991. Factor analysis of the main agronomic characters in soybean. Soybean Science, 10: 24-30.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
