Volume 10, Issue 26 (9-2018)
J Crop Breed 2018, 10(26): 104-119 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Delfan S, Bihamta M R, Hosein zade A, Sabokdast M. (2018). Genetic Diversity in Bean Genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Drought Stress Conditions
. J Crop Breed. 10(26), 104-119. doi:10.29252/jcb.10.26.104
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-725-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-725-en.html
Abstract: (3825 Views)
To evaluate genetic diversity and to determine the relationships between yield and other importante traits among bean genotypes, an experiment was conducted in Random Completely Block Design (RCBD) with three repetitions under both normal and drought stress conditions in 2015-2016 crop season on 30 bean genotypes at Tehran University research farm. The results of variance analysis indicated high variation for the most traits. Based on means comparison, the highest and the lowest seed yield in both normal and drought conditions belonged to Daneshkadeh genotype. Regression analysis showed, under normal conditions significant relationship between sheath weight related to the number of seeds per plant, harvest index and the plant height, respectively had the highest relation with seed yields and Under stress conditions, significant relationship between sheath weight related to the number of seeds per plant, internode lenght and the day to 50% poding, respectively had the highest relation with seed yields. Factor analysis in normal and drought stress conditions, identified six factors that account for 82.7 and 85.3 percent of variations, respectively. In both conditions, the most variations were to first and second factor, the highest percent of data variation. Then the two to obtain a distribution of genotypes and identify the coordinates were used. Under normal conditions genotypes 13, 16, 12, 6, 27 and 5 and under drought stress genotypes 15, 26, 12, 18, 16 and 29 that the first and second factors were positive and above were selected as superior genotypes. Cluster analysis in both normal and drought stress conditions classified studied genotypes into four groups. The greatest diversity was observed among genotypes for traits. Thus, by selecting and breeding for traits, Increased grain yield per plant.
Keywords: Cluster analysis, Correlation coefficient, Factor analysis, Means comparison, Yield and yield components
References
1. Albayrak, S. and O. Tongel. 2006. Path analysis of yield and yield-related traits of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) under different rainfall conditions. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture omu, 21: 27-32.
2. Ali Pour Yamchi, H., M.R. Bihamta, S.A. Peighambari, M.R. Naghavi and M. Shafiee Khorshidi. 2011. Evaluation of genetic diversity and classification of Kabuli chickpe genotypes in late season drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 3(7): 53-70 (In Persian).
3. Amini, A., M.R. Ghanadha and C. Abd-mishani. 2002. Genetic diversity and correlation between different traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(4): 605-615 (In Persian).
4. Anonymous. FAO. 2014. Statistics of Agricultural Crops in the World. http://www.fao.org
5. Anonymous. FAO. 2008. Statistics of Agriculture Crops in the World. http://www.fao.org.
6. Assady, B., H.R. Dorri and A. Ghadiri. 2011. Evaluation of chitti bean genotyps to drought stress using stress tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 27(4): 615-630 (In Persian).
7. Bayat, A.A., A. Sepehri, G. Ahmadvand and H.R. Dorri. 2010. Effect of water deficit stress on yield and yieldcomponents of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 12(1): 42-54 (In Persian).
8. Bernier, J., G.N. Atlin, R. Serraj, A. Kumar and D. Spaner. 2008. Breeding upland rice for drought resistance. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88(6): 927-939. [DOI:10.1002/jsfa.3153]
9. Chalyk, L.V., T.N. Balashov and A.A. Zuchenka. 2004. Relationship between yield in rench bean varieties and its structural components. Genetic heskie osnovy selektsii selskoknozyaist vennykh ratenii zhivotnykh. Biology Bulletin, 29: 53-55.
10. Ebrahimi, M., M.R. Bihamta, A.H. Hossein zadeh, F. Khiyalparast and M. Golpashi. 2010. Evaluation of reaction yield and yield components of white bean genotypes under water stress. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 8: 347-358 (In Persian).
11. Farshadfar, A. 2011. Multivariate statistical methods. Tagh-bostan, Kermanshah, Iran, 754 pp.
12. Farshadfar, A., M.R. Zamani, M. Motallebi and A. Emam Jome. 2001. Selection for drought resistance in chickpea lines. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(4): 65-77 (In Persian).
13. Franca, M.G.C., A.T.P. Thi, C. Pimentel, R.O.P. Rossiello, Y. Zuily-Fodil and D. Laffray. 2000. Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 43(3): 227-237. [DOI:10.1016/S0098-8472(99)00060-X]
14. German, C. and H .Teran. 2006. Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Sciences, 46: 2111-2120. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0029]
15. Gomez Gutierrez, O. 2004. Evaluation of Nicaraguan common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Suecia).
16. Golbashy, M., M. Ebrahimi, S.K. Khorasani and R. Choukan. 2010. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids in Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(19): 2714-2719.
17. Habibi, G.R. and M.R. Bihamta. 2007. Study of seed yield and some associate characteristics in pinto bean under reduced irrigation. Pajouhesh And Sazandegi, 1(20): 34-46.
18. Jafari, M., S.S. Moosavi, M. Chaichi, Q. Ahmadvand, M. Abdollahi. 2013. Evaluation of variability and heritability of effective traits on yield in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under non-stress and moisture stress conditions before pod formation. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 109: 59-66 (In Persian).
19. Karasu, A. and M. OZ. 2010. A study on coefficient analysis and association between agronomical characters in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(2): 203-211.
20. Keshavarznia, R., B. Mohammadi Nargesi and A.R. Abbasi. 2013. Study of genetic diversity in bean according to morphological traits under normal irrigation and drought stress condation. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 44(2): 305-315 (In Persian).
21. Khorshidi, M.S., M.R. Bihamta, F. Khialparast and M.R. Naghavi. 2013. Genetic diversity and correlation between different traits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in normal and limit irrigation conditions. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 29(2): 349-36. (In Persian)
22. Koochaki, A. and A. Banaian aval. 1993. Agronomy of leguminous. Mashad Jahad Daneshgahi Press. 236 pp (In Persian).
23. Le Houerou, H.N. 1996. Climate change, drought and desertification. Journal of Arid Environments, 34(2): 133-185. [DOI:10.1006/jare.1996.0099]
24. Mardi, M., A.R. Taleei and M. Omidi. 2003. A study of genetic diversity and identification of yield components in desi chickpea. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 34(2): 345-351 (In Persian).
25. Naseh-ghafoori, I., M.R Bihamta, M. Afzali and H.R. Dori. 2011. Comparison of seed yield and related traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties under normal and water deficit conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 3(1): 93-104 (In Persian).
26. Nielsen, D.C. and N.O. Nelson. 1998. Black bean sensitivity to water stress at various growth stages. Crop Science, 38(2): 422-42. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020025x]
27. Parsa, M., A. Bagheri. 2008. Phaseulus. Jahad daneshgahi mashhad-Iran publication. 552 pp.
28. Rebetzke, G.J., R.A. Richards, A.G. Condon and G.D. Farquhar. 2006. Inheritance of carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica, 150(1-2): 97-106. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-006-9097-4]
29. Sabokdast, M. and F. Khyalparast. 2008. A study of relationship between grain yield and yield components in common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural of Resource, 11(42): 123-134 (In Persian).
30. Safapour, M., S . Khaghani, M. Amirabadi, M. Teymori and M.K. Bezian. 2009. The effects of water stress on agronomic traits and phenology of white beans. New Findings of Agriculture, 4: 367-378. (In Persian)
31. Santalla, M., M.R. Eseribano and A.M. Ron. 1993. Correlations between agronomic and immature pod characters in population of French bean. Abs. Plant Breeding, 63: 495.
32. Schoonhoven, A.V. and O. Voysest. 1993. Common bean: Research for crop improvement. Published in Association with CIAT. Cali, Colombia. 980 pp.
33. Takeda, S. and M. Matsuoka. 2008. Genetic approaches to crop improvement: responding to environmental and population changes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(6): 444-457. [DOI:10.1038/nrg2342]
34. Toker, C. and M. Ilhan Cagirgan. 2004. The use of phenotypic correlations and factor analysis in determining characters for grain yield selection in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Hereditas, 140(3): 226-228. [DOI:10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01781.x]
35. Türkan, I., M. Bor, F. Ozdemir and H. Koca. 2005. Differential responses of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in the leaves of drought-tolerant P. acutifolius Gray and drought-sensitive P. vulgaris L. subjected to polyethylene glycol mediated water stress. Plant Science, 168(1): 223-231. [DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.032]
36. Vaezi-Rad, S., F. Shekari, A.H. Shirani-Rad and A. Zangani. 2008. Effect of limit irrigation stress at different growth stages on yield and yield components in varieties of red beans. Journal of New Agricultural Sciences, 10: 85-94 (In Persian).
37. van Schoonhoven, A. 1991. Common beans: research for crop improvement. CIAT.
38. Yucel, D.O., A.E. Anlarsal and C. Yucel. 2006. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis of yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30: 183-188.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
