Volume 11, Issue 30 (9-2019)
jcb 2019, 11(30): 47-57 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mosavi Ojagh S M, mozafari H, Jabbari H, Sani B. (2019). Study of Genetic Variation in Safflower Germplasm for Early Maturity and Grain Yield using Multivariate Statistical Methods. jcb. 11(30), 47-57. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.30.47
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-989-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-989-en.html
Department of Agronomy, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (2831 Views)
In this study, the genetic diversity of 122 safflower genotypes from the institute of plant genetics and crop plant research (IPK) and International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) were evaluated and their agronomic characteristics were compared with five Iranian Safflower cultivars (Sofe, Goldasht, Golmehr, Padide and Parnian). The study was carried out in the Augment design during 2016-2017 at the research field of seed and plant improvement institute in Karaj. The results indicated high genetic variation in the germplasm. Among safflower genotypes, plant height had the most variation. Cluster analysis was divided genotypes into four main clusters. The first cluster included early and spiny genotypes, while the second cluster contained genotypes with high yield potential and high plant height, third cluster consisting of spiny dwarf genotypes and the fourth cluster including semi-dwarf, spiny, relatively early flowering and relatively low grain yield. Based on the principal component analysis, the studied traits were reduced to two components and cumulative variance was 56.7% for two first components. Accordingly, the first and second components were flowering time and yield, respectively. Based on the results of biplot, genotypes were classified into four groups. Genotypes in the first and second groups had the higher grain yield than others. The highest grain yield was observed in NSZK "A" genotype (400 g.m-2). Iranian commercial cultivar including Sofe, Parnian and Golmehr and Iranian genotype No. 49 showed the maximum plant height. The lowest number of days to flowering was observed in genotype No. 91 (German). Tall genotypes had more grain yield than dwarf. Most spiny genotypes were early flowering than spineless genotypes. Overall, the results showed that there is a considerable genetic variation in safflower germplasm that can be used to select parents and desirable genotypes in safflower breeding programs.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2018/08/26 | Revised: 2019/12/29 | Accepted: 2019/01/8 | Published: 2019/09/11
Received: 2018/08/26 | Revised: 2019/12/29 | Accepted: 2019/01/8 | Published: 2019/09/11
References
1. Ahmadzadeh, A. 2013. Genetic diversity and classification of spring Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) cultivars using morphological characters. Advances in Bioresearch, 4: 125-131.
2. Bahmankar, M., D. Ahmadi Nabati and M. Dehdari. 2017. Genetic relationships among Iranian and exotic safflower using microsatellite markers. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 20(3): 159-165. [DOI:10.1007/s12892-017-0001-0]
3. Bahmankar, M., D. Ahmadi Nabati and A. Dehdari. 2013. Study of yield and yield components in safflower using principal component analysis. National conference of passive defense in agriculture. Qeshm Island, Iran's Leading Iranian Science and Technology Co-operative (In Persian).
4. Baljani, R., F. Shekari and N. Sabaghnia. 2015. Biplot analysis of trait relations of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes in Iran. Crop Research, 50(1-3): 63-73.
5. Bradley, V.L., R.L. Guenthner, R.C. Johnson and R.M. Hannan. 1999. Evaluation of safflower germplasm for ornamental use. In: Janik, J. (ed.) Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses, 433-435 pp., ASHS Press, Alexandria, USA.
6. Gholami, M., N. Sabaghnia, M. Nouraein, F. Shekari and M. Janmohammadi. 2018. Cluster analysis of some safflower genotypes using a number of agronomic charachteristics. Journal of Crop Breeding, 10(25): 159-166 (In Persian).
7. Jan, H.U., M.A. Rabbani and Z.K. Shinwari. 2012. Estimation of genetic variability in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) germplasm using agro-morphological traits. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44(SI1): 231-238.
8. Jaradat, A.A. and M. Shahid. 2006. Patterns of phenotypic variation in a germplasm collection of Carthamus tinctorius L. from the Middle East. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53: 225-244. [DOI:10.1007/s10722-004-6150-9]
9. Kaffka, S.R. and T.E. Kearney. 1998. Safflower production in California. University of California, Davis, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Publication 21565, Oakland, USA, 29 pp.
10. Leilah, A.A. and S.A. Al-Khateeb. 2005. Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environments, 61: 483-496. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.011]
11. Mahmood, T., S. Muhammad and Z.K. Shinwari. 2010. Molecular and morphological characterization of Caralluma species. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42: 1163-1171.
12. Mirabadi, A., M. Hagh Panah, K. Forozan and S. Talaee. 2018. Evaluating multivariate analysis some of quantitative traits in imported safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes in Sari location. Journal of Crop Breeding, 10(28): 162-170 (In Persian).
13. Morris, J.B. and S.L. Greene. 2001. Defining multiplease germplasm collection for genus Trifollium. Crop Science, 41: 893-901. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.413893x]
14. Omidi, A.H. and F. Javidfar, 2011. Safflower. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. 117 pp (In Persian).
15. Omidi, A.H., H. Khazaei and S. Hongbo. 2009. Variation for some important agronomic traits in 100 spring Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 5(6): 791-795.
16. Pavithra, K.P., S. Rajesh, Y. Patil Harijan and G.K. Nishanth. 2016. Correlation and path analysis studies in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(2): 428-432.
17. Poordad, S. 2006. Safflower. Sepehr Publication. 123 pp (In Persian).
18. Sharifnabi, B. and G. Saeidi. 2004. Preliminary evaluation of different genotypes of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to Fusarium root rot disease. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 8(3): 219-227 (In Persian).
19. Shinwari, Z.K., H. Rehman and M. Ashiq Rabbani. 2014. Morphological traits based genetic diversity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 46(4): 1389-1395.
20. Shiravand, R. and M. Majidi. 2014. Drought tolerance of wild and cultivated species of safflower and assessment of morphological variation. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(4): 738-750 (In Persian).
21. Usha Kiran, B., N. Mukta, P. Kadirvel, K. Alivelu, S. Senthilvel, P. Kishore and K. Varaprasad. 2017. Genetic diversity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm as revealed by SSR markers. Plant Genetic Resources, 15(1): 1-11. [DOI:10.1017/S1479262115000295]
22. Weiss, E.A. 2000. Oilseed crops. 2th edn. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, London, Berlin Carlton, Paris. 364 pp.
23. Yasari, T., M. Shahsavari, A. Barzegar and A.H. Omidi. 1995. Study of developmental stages and relationship between of them and seed yield in ten advanced safflower genotypes. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 68(3): 75-83 (In Persian).
24. Yazdi Samadi, B. 1978. Evaluation of drought resistance in Iranian and foreign safflower cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 2&3: 6-10 (In Persian).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
