دوره 11، شماره 32 - ( زمستان 1398 )
جلد 11 شماره 32 صفحات 115-100 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
RAHI A R, Najafi Zarini H, Ranjbar G, Ghajar Spanlou M. (2019). Evaluation of Tolerance of Some Soybean Genotypes to Drought Stress. J Crop Breed. 11(32), 100-115. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.32.100
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-971-fa.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-971-fa.html
رهی علیرضا، نجفی زرین حمید، رنجبر غلامعلی، قاجارسپانلو مهدی. ارزیابی تحمل به خشکی برخی از ژنوتیپ‌های سویا پژوهشنامه اصلاح گیاهان زراعی 1398; 11 (32) :115-100 10.29252/jcb.11.32.100
1- گروه به نژادی و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منایع طبیعی ساری
چکیده: (3144 مشاهده)
به منظور ارزیابی تحمل به خشکی تعداد 15 ژنوتیپ سویا به صورت آزمایش فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در شرایط گلخانه در شهرستان دماوند انجام شد. عامل اول شامل 15 ژنوتیپ سویا و عامل دوم شامل دو سطح آبیاری نرمال و قطع آبیاری در زمان غلاف دهی بود. صفات شامل ارتفاع بوته، تعداد شاخه های زایشی، تعداد برگ، کلروفیل a، کلروفیل b، کلروفیل کل، کاروتنوئید، تعداد روز تا گلدهی، تعداد روز تا 50% غلاف دهی، تعداد گل، وزن خشک برگ بوته، تعداد بند ساقه اصلی، تعداد بند ساقه های فرعی، وزن خشک ساقه های یک بوته، وزن خشک بوته، فاصله اواین غلاف از خاک، رسیدگی کامل، تعداد غلاف در هر بوته، وزن خشک غلاف در بوته، طول غلاف، متوسط تعداد دانه در غلاف، تعداد دانه های هر بوته، شاخص برداشت، وزن صد دانه و عملکرد هر گلدان بودند. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد که واکنش ژنوتیپ های سویا به شرایط تنش خشکی و بدون تنش متفاوت بود. در مجموع ژنوتیپ های 1، 4، 10، 14و 15 دو شرایط تنش خشکی و نرمال عملکرد بالایی را نشان دادند. نتایج تجزیه همبستگی نشان داد که بیشترین همبستگی را صفات تعداد دانه های هر بوته، شاخص برداشت، وزن خشک غلاف در بوته و وزن خشک بوته با عملکرد داشتند. بین صفات مستقل و وابسته 99% رابطه رگرسیونی معنی داری برقرار بود. نتایج تجزیه علیت نشان داد که وزن خشک بوته و وزن صد دانه بیشترین اثر مستقیم مثبت را بر عملکرد داشتند. نتایج تجزیه به مولفه های اصلی نشان داد که مولفه های اول و دوم در مجموع 85% واریانس کل را تبیین کردند. با در نظر گرفتن همه صفات تجزیه کلاستر ژنوتیپ ها را به 5 گروه تقسیم نمود و ژنوتیپ های 1، 9، 10، 14 و 15 در یک گروه قرار داد این ژنوتیپ ها بر اساس میانگین در هر دو محیط عملکرد خوبی داشتند.
فهرست منابع
1. Abdipuor, M., A. Rezaee, S. Hoshmand and G. Bagherifard. 2008. Evaluation of drought tolerance of unlimited soybean growth genotypes in flowering and seeding stages. Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences, 4(2): 140-150 (In Persian).
2. Ahmadi, J. and V. Solimani. 2014. The Expression Profile of OSBP, CAT and BZIP Genes in Drought Tolerant and Susceptible Soybean Cultivars Using Real Time PCR. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 6(3): 1-16 (In Persian).
3. Ahmadi, K., H. Ghalizadeh, H. Abadzadeh, R. Hosseinpour, E. Abdshah, A. Kazimian and M. Rafiee. 2017. Agricult ural Statistics. first volume. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture Department of Planning and Economics, Information and Communication Technology Center. 420 pp (In Persian(.
4. Albarrak, G.H. 2000. Effect of irrigation regimes, planting data Nitrogen level on Brassica napus.Cultivars Agronomy Journal, 7(1): 87-89.
5. Amin far, J., Gh. Mohsen Abadi, M.H. Beigloii and H. Sami Zadeh. 2013. Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Yield, Yield components and Water Productivity of Soybean T. 215 Cultivar. J Irrigation and Water, 3(11): 23-34 (In Persian).
6. Arab Khadri, M. and K. Kamali. 2017. Bondsar, Traditional Soil Conservation Methods. Agricultural Research, Training and Promotion Organization, 70 pp (In Persian).
7. Arnon, D.T. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolation chloroplast phenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24: 1-14. [DOI:10.1104/pp.24.1.1]
8. Behtari, B., K. Ghasemi, A. Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab, S. Zehtab Salmasi and M. Torchi. 2014. Path and ridge regression analysis of seed yield and seed yield components of soybean under different irrigation regimes. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 140: 158-166 (In Persian).
9. Benjamin, J.G. and D.C. Nielsen. 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crops Res, 97: 248-253. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2005.10.005]
10. Bihamta, M., M. Shirkavand, J. Hasanpour and A. Afzalifar. 2018. Evaluation of Durum Wheat Genotypes under Normal Irrigation and Drought Stress Conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(24): 119-136 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.9.24.119]
11. Bokaee, A., H. Babaee, D. Habibi, F. Javidfar and A. Mohammadi. 2008. Evaluation of different soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes under drought stress conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 4(1): 28-38 (In Persian).
12. Dadras, A., H. Samizadeh and H. Sabouri. 2017. Evaluation of Soybean Varieties and Advanced Lines Yield under Drought Stress Conditions using GGE Biplot Analysis. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(23): 17-26 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.9.23.18]
13. Daneshian, J. 2000. Ecophysiological study of water deficit on soybean. Ph. D. Thesis, Azad Uni, Science and Research branch, 250 pp (In Persian).
14. Faraji, A. 2016. Evaluation of Some Soybean Genotypes (Glycine max) under Salt Stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(18): 30-36 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.8.18.30]
15. Fazeli, F., H. Najafi Zarini, M. Arefrad and A. Zaman Mirabadi. 2015. Assessment of Relation of Morphological Traits with Seed Yield and Their Diversity in M4 Generation of Soybean Mutant Lines [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] Through Factor Analysis. Journal of Crop Breeding, 7(15): 47-56 (In Persian).
16. Firoozi B., A. Potters, M. Shakerpour, A. Rasoul Zadeh and F. Ahmadpour 2012. Evaluation of Spring Wheat Genotypes Using Drought Tolerance and Main Component Analysis. Journal of Environmental Tensions in Crop Sciences, 5(2): 99-113.
17. Fritsche-Neto, R. and A. Borém. 2012. Plant breeding for abiotic stress tolerance. Departamento de Fitotecnia Universidade Federal de Viçosa. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-30553-5]
18. Ghodrati, G. 2011. Evaluation of seed yield, Quantitative and Quality characteristics of the new Soybean lines in north of Khozestan. Crop Physiology Journal, 3(11): 107-117 (In Persian).
19. Hossein Zadeh, M. 2009. Investigation of quantitative and qualitative traits in soybean cultivars on different irrigation regimes in Ilam climatic conditions. M.Sc. University of Ilam. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, 142 pp.
20. Isaac Zadeh, M., H. Ahmadzadeh and A. Freddy Fred. 2014. Meteorological Drought Deterioration Zone of the country according to Herbst index using Kriging methods. Second National Conference on Water Crisis. 562-571. Shahrekord (In Persian).
21. Jafarbay, J., M. Etesami, S. Jahanifar and M.H. Arzanesh. 2017. Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Yield and Quantative of Wheat Cultivars under Dry and Irrigated Conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(23): 44-57 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.9.23.44]
22. Kamrava, S., N. Babaeian Jolodar and N. Bagheri. 2017. Evaluation of Drought Stress on Chlorophyll and Proline Traits in Soybean Genotypes. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(23): 95-104 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.9.23.95]
23. Kargar , M., A. Mostafaei, I. Majidi and H. Saeed Pourdad. 2012. Investigation of Correlation and Path Analysis of Traits of Soybean Genotypes under Drought Stress .Crop Production under Environmental Conditions, 4(2): 46-31 (In Persian).
24. Khodarahmpour, Z. and M. Motamedi. 2016. Study of Genetic Diversity of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Genotypes Via Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(19): 163-169 (In Persian).
25. Kiani, A. and S. Raeisi. 2013. Assessment of water use efficiency in some soybean cultivars under different amount of irrigation. J. of Water and Soil Conservation, 20(5): 179-192 (In Persian).
26. Kobraee, K. and K. Shamsi. 2011. Evaluation of Soybean Yield Under Drought Stress by Path Analysis. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10): 890-895 (In Persian).
27. Kochaki, A and N. Mahallati.1994.Ecology of crops. Mashhad University Press (In Persian).
28. Kumar, D. 2004. Breeding for drought resistance. Food Products Press.
29. Li, F.M., P. Wang, J. Wang and J. Xu. 2004. Effects of irrigation before sowing and plastic film mulching on yield and water uptake of spring wheat in semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural and Water Management, 67(2): 77-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2004.02.001]
30. Lu, C., N. Qiu, Q. Lu, B. Wang and T. Kuango. 2002. Does salt stress lead to increased susceptibility of photosystem II to photoinhibition and changes in photosynthetic pigment composition in halophyte Sueda salsa grown outdoors? Plant Science. 163: 1063-1068. [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00281-9]
31. Malek Mohammadi, Z., H. Sabori, A. Biyabani and Ahezarjaribi. 2014. Correlation of soybean yield components. The 13th Iranian Conference on Plant Breeding and the Third Iranian Congress of Science and Technology in Seeds. 2111-2117 Karaj (In Persian).
32. Masoudi, B., M.R. Behemat, H. Babaei and A. Peghambi. 2008. Evaluation of the relationship between grain yield and biological yield with some important crop characteristics in soybeans by causality analysis. Iranian Crop Sciences, 39(1): 77-87 (In Persian).
33. Mohammadi, S. 2014. Evolution of grain yield and its components relationships in bread wheat genotypes under full irrigation and terminal water stress conditions using multivariate statistical analysis. Bimonthly iranian journal of field crops research. 12(1): 99-109 (In Persian).
34. Muchlish Adie, M. and A. Krisnawati. 2017. Characterization and clustering of agronomic characters of several soybean genotypes. Nusantara Bioscience, 9(3): 237-242. [DOI:10.13057/nusbiosci/n090301]
35. Navabpour, S., E. Khazjarribi and A. Mazandrani. 2018. Effect of drought stress on important agronomic traits and protein and seed oil content in soybean genotypes. Environmental stresses in crop science. 10(4): 491-453 (In Persian).
36. Peghambari, A., M. Talebkhani, H.R. Babaei and H. Alipour. 2017. Evaluation of water stress tolerance in different soybeans. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 48(4): 933-943.
37. Poor Mousavi, P., M. Galavi, J. Daneshiyan, A. Ghanbari, N. Basirani and P. Jonoobi. 2009. Effect of Animal Manure Application on Quantitative and Qualitative Yield of Soybean in Drought Stress Conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 40(1): 133-145 (In Persian).
38. Pourdehghan, M., S.A. Mohammad Modares Sanavi, F. Ghonati and S. Karami. 2015. Effect of Hexaconazole on Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Two Soybean Cultures in Underwater Stress Conditions. Journal of Production and Processing of Agricultural and Horticultural Products, 5(16): 109-120 (In Persian(. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jcpp.5.16.109]
39. Pushpavalli, R., M. Zaman-Allah, N.C. Turner, R. Baddam, M.V. Rao and V. Vadez. 2014. Higher flower and seed number leads to higher yield under water stress conditions imposed during reproduction in chickpea. RESEARCH ARTICLE. 42(2): 162-174. [DOI:10.1071/FP14135]
40. Rangwala, T., A. Bafna1, N. Vyas and R. Gupta. 2018. Role of soluble silica in alleviating oxidative stress in soybean cropIndian Journal Agriculture Resource, 52(1): 9-15. [DOI:10.18805/IJARe.A-4882]
41. Rezaeizad, A., B. Yazdi Samadi, M. Ahmadi and H. Zainali. 2001. Investigating the relationship between soybean yield and its components by analyzing causality. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 5(3): 107-115 (In Persian).
42. Sarmadnia, G. 1993. The Importance of Environmental Stresses in Agriculture. Iranian Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 157-169 (In Persian).
43. Shahmoradi, Sh., H. Zainali Khaneghah, J. Daneshiyan, N. Khodabandeh and A. Ahmadi. 2009. Effect of Drought Stress on Suyaba Advanced Cultivars and Lines Emphasis on Stress Tolerance Indices. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 40(3): 9-22 (In Persian).
44. Sharifa, S. and A. Muriefah. 2015. Effects of paclobutrazol on growth and physiological attributes of Soybean (Glycine max) plants grown under water stress conditions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences, 2: 81-93.
45. Soleimani, A. M. Valizadeh2, Reza Darvishzadeh, S. Aharizad and H. Alipour. 2017. Evaluation of Yield and Yield Component of Spring Barely Genotypes under Late Season Drought Stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(23): 105-116 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.9.23.105]
46. Sp, P., N. Nugrahaeni and A. Sulistyo. 2017. Response of soybean genotypes introduced from South Korea to drought stress during reproductive stage. BIODIVERSITAS. 18(1): 15-19. [DOI:10.13057/biodiv/d180103]
47. Shurtleff, W. and A. Aoyagi. 2013. History of Whole Dry Soybeans, Used as Beans, or Ground, Mashed or Flaked (240 BCE to 2013). Lafayette, California. 950 pp.
48. Tahmasbe, A.M., A. Asghari, O. Sofalian, H. Mohammaddoust ChamanAbad and A. Rasoulzadeh. 2017. Study some of Wheat Cultivars Based on Morphological Traits and Drought Tolerance Indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21): 44-55 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.9.21.44]
49. Vahdi, V., E. Gholinezhad, S. Mansourifard, L.G. Arani and M. Rahimi. 2015. Effect of drought stress on seed yield, oil and protein of soybean (Glycine max L.) different cultivars.
50. Yahooyan, S., M.R. Byahmeta, H.R. Babaei and D. Habibi. 2010. Effects of water deficit stress on yield and yield components of soybean genotypes. Crop Science, 3(2): 85-96 (In Persian).
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
