Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Sugar Beet Half-Sib Inbred Lines under Farm Water Stress Condition

Hamidi, Hasan; Ahmadi, Masoud; Ramezanpour, Seyedeh Sanaz; Masomi, Ali; khoramian, sara

doi:10.29252/jcb.10.28.145

Volume 10, Issue 28 (12-2018) J Crop Breed 2018, 10(28): 145-154 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.29252/jcb.10.28.145

‎ 20.1001.1.22286128.1397.10.28.5.2

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Hamidi H, Ahmadi M, Ramezanpour S S, Masomi A, khoramian S. (2018). Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Sugar Beet Half-Sib Inbred Lines under Farm Water Stress Condition. J Crop Breed. 10(28), 145-154. doi:10.29252/jcb.10.28.145
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-748-en.html

Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Sugar Beet Half-Sib Inbred Lines under Farm Water Stress Condition

Hasan Hamidi¹, Masoud Ahmadi ^*², Seyedeh Sanaz Ramezanpour³, Ali Masomi⁴, Sara Khoramian⁴

1- Crops and Horticulture Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran
2- Sugar Beet Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran
3- Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
4- Payam Noor Univercity, Mashhad

Abstract: (3158 Views)

This study was conducted to evaluate the genetic diversity of sugar beet half sib inbred lines (48 lines and one control cultivar) under water stress (200mm of class A evaporation pan) in field conditions in a randomized complete block design with three replicates in Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center in 2015. In this research, traits such as root yield, raw sugar yield, sugar content of root, leaf number, index of difference between the temperature of environment and leaf, succulence index, leaf relative water content, specific leaf weight, leaf color score, leaf growth score, leaf architecture, root growth score and ratio of length to width of root were measured. Results showed that there were significant differences (p≤0.01) between studied genotypes for all traits. Results showed that, there were significant positive correlations between root yield and sugar yield, leaf color score and root growth score, while, significant and negative correlations were observed between root yield, leaf number and ratio of length to width of root. The dendrogram generated from the cluster analysis for sugar yield classified genotypes into four main groups. Factor analysis led to introduction of four main factors which explained 73.2 percent of total variation. Hf4 s1 genotype showed superiority for root yield, sugar yield and leaf color score than other studied genotypes, indicating that, this genotype has a high potential for drought tolerance.

Keywords: Drought, Genotype, Root yield, Sugar yield

Full-Text [PDF 1470 kb] (932 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/03/15 | Accepted: 2017/09/10

References

1. AbdollahianNoghabi, M., Z. Radaei-al-amoli, G.A. Akbari and S.A. Sadat Nuri. 2011. Effect of severe water stress on morphological, quantitative and qualitative characteristics of 20 sugar beet genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 42(3): 453-464 (In Persian).

2. Ahmadi, M. 2012. Study on characteristics related to drought tolerance in improved sugar beet population. Ph.D. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Science and Research of Tehran, 229 pp (In Persian).

3. Ahmadi, M., E. Majidi Heravan, S.Y. Sadeghian, M. Mesbah and F. Darvish. 2011. Drought tolerance variability in S1 pollinator lines developed from a sugar beet open population. Euphytica, 178: 339-349. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-010-0307-8]

4. Barker, T., H. Campos, M. Cooper, D. Dolan, G.O. Edmeades, J. Habben, J. Schussler, D. Wright and C. Zinselmeier. 2005. Improving drought tolerance in maize. Plant Breeding Research, 25: 173-253. [DOI:10.1002/9780470650301.ch7]

5. Barrs, H.D. and P.E. Weatherly. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15:413-428. [DOI:10.1071/BI9620413]

6. Bloch, D., C.M. Hoffmann and B. Marlander. 2006. Impact of water supply on growth, photosynthesis, water use and carbon isotope discrimination of sugar beet in relation to genotypic variability. European Journal of Agronomy, 24: 218-225. [DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.004]

7. Brown, K.E., A.B. Messem, R.I. Dunham and P.V. Biscoe. 1987. Effect of drought on growth and water use of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, 109: 421-435. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859600081636]

8. Cooke, D.A. and R.K. Scott. 1993. The sugar beet crop, Chapman and Hall Pub, 663 pp. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-0373-9]

9. Ebrahimi Pak, N.A. 2010. Determination of yield response factor (Ky) of sugar beet to deficit irrigation at different growth stages. Journal of Sugar beet, 26(1): 67-79 (In Persian).

10. Fateh, M., M. AbdolahianNoghabi and M. Mesbah. 2004. Effect of contioulesly drought stress on physiological traits of suger beet in Karaj. 8th Iranian Agronomy and Plant Breeding Congeres, Agust. Karaj. Iran, 23-25 (In Persian).

11. Jaggard, K.W., A.M. Dewar and J.D. Pidgeon. 1998. The relative effects of drought stress and virus yellows on the yield of sugar beet in the U.K. 1980-1995. Journal of Agricultural Science, 130: 337-343. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859698005371]

12. Kamoshita, A., R. Chandra Babu, N. Manikanda Boopathi and S. Fukai. 2008. Phenotypic and genetypic analysis of drought resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crops Research, 109: 1-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.06.010]

13. Mirzaei, M.Z., M. Rezvani and J. Gohari. 2005. Effect of drought stress in different growth stages on yield and some physiological properties of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet, 21(1):1-14 (In Persian).

14. Mohamadian, R. 2001. Determinate of effective physiological indices on drought resistant on sugar beet. Ph.D. of Thesis Agronomy. Tabriz University, 221 pp (In Persian).

15. Mohammadian, R., F.R. Khoyi H. Rahimian, M. Moghaddam, K. Ghasemi Golezani and S.Y. Sadeghian. 2001. The effect of early season drought on stomata conductance. Leaf-air temperature difference and prolin accumulation in sugar beet genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 3: 181-193.

16. Mohammadian, R., H. Rahimian, M. Moghaddam and S.Y. Sadeghian. 2003. The effect of early season drought on chlorophyll a fluorescence in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6: 1763-1769. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2003.1763.1769]

17. Mohammadian, R., S.Y. Sadeghian, M. Moghaddam and H. Rahimian. 2003. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in determining sugar beet genotypes under early season drought conditions. Journal of Sugar Beet, 18: 29-51 (In Persian).

18. Ober, E.S. and M.C. Luterbacher. 2002. Genetic variation for drought tolerance ib Beta vulgaris. Annals of Botany, 89: 917-924. [DOI:10.1093/aob/mcf093]

19. Ober, E.S., M.L. Bloa, C.J.A. Clark, A. Royal, K.W. Jaggard and J.D. Pidgeon. 2005. Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet. Field Crops Research, 91: 231-249. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.012]

20. Rajabi, A., M. Moghaddam, F. Rahimzadeh, M. Mesbah and Z. Ranji. 2002. Evaluation of, genetic diversity in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) populations for agronomic traits and crop quality. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(3): 553-567 (In Persian).

21. Romano, A., A. Sorgonà, A. Lupini, F. Araniti, P. Stevanato, P. Cacco and M.R. Abenavoli. 2013. Morpho-physiological responses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes to drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35: 853-865. [DOI:10.1007/s11738-012-1129-1]

22. Sadeghian, S.Y. and N. Yavari. 2004. Effect of water deficit stress on germination and early seedling growth in sugar beet. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190: 138-144. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00087.x]

23. Sadeghian, S.Y., H. Fazli, R. Mohammadian, D.E. Taleghani and M. Mesbah. 2000. Genetic variation for drought stress in sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet Research, 37: 55-77. [DOI:10.5274/jsbr.37.3.55]

24. Sharifi, M. 2003. Investigation on correlation of drought tolerance physiological indexes with qualitative and quantitative of ten new suger beet genotypes. M.Sc. Thesis in Crop Breeding. Shiraz University, Iran, 142 pp (In Persian).

25. Tsuda, C. and M. Hachince. 1973. Genetic studies on the negative correlation between root weight and sugar content in sugar beets. VIII. Correlation response of some foliar characters accompanied with mass selection. Japanese Journal of Breeding, 23: 139-147. [DOI:10.1270/jsbbs1951.23.139]

26. Vazan, S. 2002. Investigation the effect of drought stress on the accumulation of abscisic acid and other physiological traits in sugar beet. Ph.D. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Science and Research of Tehran, 152 pp (In Persian).