Volume 10, Issue 28 (12-2018)                   jcb 2018, 10(28): 119-124 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hashemi A S, nematzadeh G, oladi M, Afkhami Ghadi A, Gholizadeh Ghara. Study of Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Promising Genotypes Adaptation in Different Regions of Mazandaran. jcb. 2018; 10 (28) :119-124
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-747-en.html
Abstract:   (497 Views)
Evaluating the promising genotypes in different years and locations is performed to identify stable and adaptable genotypes with high yield potential. For this purpose, three genotypes of rapeseed derived from crossing of three varieties named Foseto, Option 500 and Goliath were planted with check variety (Hyola 401) in three locations (Sari, Behshar and qarakheil) using randomized complete block design with 3 replicates from 2012 to 2014 cropping season. Results indicated that the average of grain yield in of: 5616 kg.ha-1 for genotype 43 in Sari, 3871 kg.ha-1 for genotype 43 in Behshahr and 3550 kg.ha-1 for genotype 29 in qarakheil were recorded. The yield of these genotypes was higher or did not have significant difference than check variety (Hyola401). Generally using stability analysis and yield mean, it can be suggested that genotype 43 with the least stable and high yield in Sari and Behshar is a good candidate for these regions. In addition, genotype 29 with good general adaptation and in next priority, 28 with average general adaptation are suitable candidates for all three locations.
Full-Text [PDF 168 kb]   (112 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/03/14 | Revised: 2019/03/2 | Accepted: 2017/11/8 | Published: 2019/03/2

References
1. Ahmadi, J., B. Vaezi and H. Naraki. 2013. Analysis of canola stability in rain-fed conditions and comparison of stable genotypes selection methods using stability indices. The Plant Production, 36: 13-22 (In Persian).
2. Aliari, H., F. Shekari and F. Shekari. 2000. Oil Seeds: Agronomy and Phisiology. Amidi Publication, 182 pp (In Persian).
3. Amiri Oghan, H., M.H. Alam Khomram and F. Javidfar. 2004. Stability of seed yield in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 6: 203-213 (In Persian).
4. Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x]
5. Hayward, M.D., N.O. Bosemark and T. Romagosa. 1993. Plant breeding principles and prospects. Chapman and Hall. London, 550 pp. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-1524-7]
6. Javidfar, F., M.H. Alam Khomram, H. Amiri Oghan and S. Azizinia. 2004. Yield stability analysis of winter canola (Brassica napus L.) genotypes. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 20: 315-328 (In Persian).
7. Javidfar, F., B. Alizadeh, H. Amiri Oghan and N. Sabaghnia. 2010. A Study of Genotype by Environment Interaction in Oilseed Rape Genotypes, Using GGE Biplot Method. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 41: 771-779 (In Persian).
8. Ketata, H. 1988. Genotype and environment interaction. Proceedings of the Biometrical Techniques for Cereal Breeders. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, 16-32 pp.
9. Khoshnazar-porshokohi, R., M.R. Ahmadi and M.R. Ghanadha. 2000. A study of adaptation and yield capacity of rapeseed (Brassica napus) cultivars and lines. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31: 341-352 (In Persian).
10. Mahmood, T., E. Hasan, M. Ali and M. Hussain. 2012. Faisal canola: a new high yielding canola variety for general cultivation in Punjub. Journal of Agricultural Research, 50: 321-328 (In Persian).
11. Nourabonjar, M. 2009. Evaluation of yield and yield components of hopeful hybrids of spring canila (Brassica napus) in Iranshahr climatic condition. Journal of New Agricultural Science, 14: 47-55.
12. Oghan, H.A., N. Sabaghnia, V. Rameeh, H.R. Fanaee and E. Hezarjerib. 2016. Univariate Stability Analysis of Genotype× Environment Interaction of Oilseed Rape Seed Yield. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64: 1625-1634. [DOI:10.11118/actaun201664051625]
13. Rameeh, V., S.A. Dalili, S.V. Alavi, H. Amiri Oghan, F. Shariati and E. Hezarjeribi. 2013. Zafar as New Cultivar of Spring Type of Rapeseed for Cultivation in Mid-land of Mazandaran Province and Similar Regions. Research Achivements for Field and Horticulture Crops, 3: 13-23 (In Persian).
14. Shah, S.A., R. Aamir and S.T. Shah. 2007. Development of a new high yielding canola quality rapeseed variety DURR-E-NIFA for general cultivation in NWFP. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39:2475-2481.
15. Shukla, G.K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-242. [DOI:10.1038/hdy.1972.87]
16. Wricke, G. 1962. Uber eine methode zur erfassung der geologischen sterubretic in feld versuchen. Pflanzuecht, 47: 92-96.
17. Zhang, H., J.D. Berger and C. Herrmann. 2017. Yield stability and daptability of canola (Brassica napus L.) in multiple environment trials. Euphytica, 213: 155-176. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-017-1948-7]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb