Volume 10, Issue 27 (11-2018)                   jcb 2018, 10(27): 39-48 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tondroo M, masoumiasl A, dehdari M, Khadem hamzeh H. (2018). Evaluation of Water Deficit Stress Effects on Morpho-Physiologicall Characteristics in Some Triticale Genotypes. jcb. 10(27), 39-48. doi:10.29252/jcb.10.27.39
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-721-en.html
Yasouj University
Abstract:   (2963 Views)

Among the crops, cereals have been special important and triticale is the most successful man made cereal. In present research, water deficit stress effects on 19 triticale genotypes (X Triticosecale wittmack) and two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum), Shiraz (sensitive to water deficit stress) and Kavir (tolerant to water deficit stress) were tested. Therefore, two separate field experiments were performed based on Randomized Complete Block Design with 3 replications. In the first experiment, normal irrigation was used and in the second experiment irrigation has been eliminated at flowering step. Vegetative and yield component triats such as plant height, spike length, number of spikelets per spike, grains per spike, tiller number in plant, thousand grain weight, biological yield and grain yield were measured. Relative water content (RWC) and rate of leaf water loss (RWL) and total chlorophyll content as physiological traits were evaluated. Results showed that although water deficit stress decreased grain yield in different genotypes in comparison of normal irrigation, some genotypes tolerated water deficit stress and produced relatively high yield. Genotype ELTCC1 showed superior in thousand grain weight and number of spikelets per spike in normal irrigation condition and biological yield, grain yield, grains per spike and plant height in stress condition. Overall, we can introduce ELTCC1 and ELTCC15 genotypes as desired genotypes, because they showed more tolerance in comparison with other genotypes based on tolerance and susceptible indices and also yield in stress and normal irrigation conditions.

Full-Text [PDF 900 kb]   (776 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/02/2 | Revised: 2018/12/9 | Accepted: 2017/10/23 | Published: 2018/12/8

References
1. Ahmadi, J.H., M. Khanghah, A. Rostami and R. Chogan. 2000. Drought resistance indices and using bi-plot in seed corn hybrids. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Iran, 31(3): 513-524 (In Persian).
2. Augé, R.M., H.D. Toler and A.M. Saxton. 2015. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis. Mycorrhiza, 25(1): 13-24. [DOI:10.1007/s00572-014-0585-4]
3. Baczek-Kwinta, R., W. Filek, S. Grzesiak and T. Hura. 2006. The effect of soil drought and rehydration on growth and antioxidative activity in flag leaves of triticale. Biologia Plantarum, 50(1): 55-60. [DOI:10.1007/s10535-005-0074-x]
4. Baire, A.C. 1991. Triticale in the warmer areas. CIMMYT. Mexico.
5. Bihamta, M.R., M. Shirkavand, J. Hasanpour and A. Afzalifar. 2018. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes under normal irrigation and drought stress condition. Journal of Crop Breeding, 24(9): 119-136 (In Persian).
6. Blum, A. 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA.
7. Boggess, S.F., C.R. Stewarty, D. Aspinall and L.G. Paleg. 1976. Effect of water stress on praline synthesis from radioactive precursors. Plant Physiol, 58: 398-401. [DOI:10.1104/pp.58.3.398]
8. Boleslaw, P., S. Wicz and M. Dylewicz. 2007. Identification and characterization of high- molecular- weight glutenin genes in Polish triticale cultivars by PCR- based DNA markers. Journal of Applied Genetics, 48: 347-357. [DOI:10.1007/BF03195231]
9. Borsani, O., V. Valpuesta and M.N. Botella. 2001. Evidence for a role of salicylic acid in the oxidative damage generated by NaCl and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis seedling. Plant Physioogy, 126: 1024-1030. [DOI:10.1104/pp.126.3.1024]
10. Boyer, J.S. 1968. Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves. Plant Physiology, 43(7): 1056-106. [DOI:10.1104/pp.43.7.1056]
11. Clarke, J.M. and T.N. McCaig. 1982. Excised-leaf water retention capability as an indicator of drought resistance of Triticum genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 62(3): 571-578. [DOI:10.4141/cjps82-086]
12. Clarke, J.M. and T.F. Townley Smith. 1984. Drying rates of spring triticale compared to wheat. Agronomy Journal, 76: 450-456. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030020x]
13. Damghan, I. 2009. ExogEnous application of brassinostEroid allEviatEs drought-inducEd oxidativE strEss in Lycopersicon escuLentum l. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 35(1-2): 22-34.
14. Del-Angel, A.R. and A. Sotelo. 2009. Nutritive value of mixtures using chick-peas with wheat, triticale, normal and opaque-2 corns. Journal of Nutrition, 110: 1474-1480. [DOI:10.1093/jn/112.8.1474]
15. Farshadfar, A. and H. Javadinia. 2012. Evaluation of chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) tolerance to drought stress. Seed and Plant Journal, 1(4): 537-517.
16. Farshadfar, E., M.R. Zamani, M. Matlabi and E.E. Emam-jome. 2001. Selection for drought resistance chichpea lines. Journal of Agricultural Science, 32: 65-77.
17. Fernandez, G.C.J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceedings of a symposium. Taiwan, 257-270 pp.
18. Fischer, R.A., J.L. Lindt and A. Glave. 1977. Irrigation of dwarf wheats in the Yaqui Valley of Mexico. Experimental Agriculture, 13: 353-367. [DOI:10.1017/S0014479700008115]
19. Fischer, R.A. and R. Maurer. 1987. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivar. I. Grain yield response. Australian journal of Agriculture research, 29: 897-912. [DOI:10.1071/AR9780897]
20. Ghanem, M.E., H. Marrou and T.R. Sinclair. 2014. Physiological phenotyping of plants for crop improvement. Trends in Plant Science, 20(3): 139-144. [DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2014.11.006]
21. Haffani, S., M. Mezni, I. Slama, M. Ksontini and W. Chaibi. 2014. Plant growth, water relations and proline content of three vetch species under water‐limited conditions. Grass and Forage Science, 69(2): 323-333. [DOI:10.1111/gfs.12034]
22. Heslot, N., D. Akdemir, M.E. Sorrells and J.L. Jannink. 2014. Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127(2): 463-480. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-013-2231-5]
23. Hulse, J. and E. Laing. 1974. Nutritive value of triticale protein. International Development Research Center, Ottawa, Canada, 183 pp.
24. Lawson, T., K. Oxborough, J.I.L. Morison and N.R. Baker. 2003. The responses of guard and mesophyll cell photosynthesis to CO2, O2, light and water stress in a range of species are similar. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54: 743-52. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erg186]
25. Levitt, J. 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stress. Vol.I. Academic Press, New York,
26. Liang, Y.C., Q. Chen, Q. Liu, W.H. Zhang and R.X. Ding. 2003. Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiology, 160: 1157-1164. [DOI:10.1078/0176-1617-01065]
27. Litchenthaler, H. and K. Boschman. 2001. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids:Measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry, 26: 54-60.
28. Maluszynski, M., I. Szarejko, P. Barriga and A. Balcerzyk. 2001. Heterosis in crop mutant crosses and production of high yielding lines using doubled haploid systems. Euphytica, 120: 387-398. [DOI:10.1023/A:1017569617715]
29. Maria, E.B., D.A. Jose, C.B. Maria and P.A. Francisco. 2000. Carbon partitioning and sucrose metabolism in tomato plants growing under salinity. Physiologia Plantarum, 110: 503-511. [DOI:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.1100412.x]
30. Moghaddam, A. and M.H. Hadizadeh. 2002. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids and their parental lines to drought using different stress tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 18(3): 255-272 (In Persian).
31. Naghavi, M. R., M. Moghaddam, M. Toorchi and M.R. Shakiba. 2016. Evaluation of spring wheat cultivars for physiological, morphological and agronomic traits under drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 18(8): 64-77 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.8.18.64]
32. Nazeri, D. and A.S. Nawabi. 1996. CIMMYT triticale and its amendments. Cereal Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, 56 pp (In Persian).
33. Oettler, G. 2005. Centenary review. The fortune of a botanical curiosity- triticale: Past, present and future. Journal of Agricultural Science, 143: 329-346. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859605005290]
34. Pessarakli, M. 2014. Handbook of plant and crop physiology. CRC Press, 614 pp. [DOI:10.1201/b16675]
35. Royo, C., M. Abaza, R. Blanco and L.F. Garcıadel Moral. 2000. Triticale grain growth and morphometry as affected by drought stress, late sowing and simulated drought stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 27: 1051-1059. [DOI:10.1071/PP99113]
36. Safaee, H. and H. Ghadiri. 1996. Soil water stress effects on some morphological and physiological six wheat )Triticum arstivum L.) Varieties in the greenhouse. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Iran, 26(3): 9-18 (In Persian).
37. Sairam, R. 1994. Effect of moisture-stress on physiological activities of two contrasting wheat genotypes. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 32: 594-594.
38. Serna-Saldivar, S.O., S. Guajardo-Flores and R. Viesca-Rios. 2004. Potential of Triticale as a Substitute for Wheat in Flour Tortilla Production 1. Cereal chemistry, 81(2): 220-225. [DOI:10.1094/CCHEM.2004.81.2.220]
39. Shimshi, D., M.L. Mayoral and D. Atsmon. 1982. Responses to water stress in wheat and related wild species. Crop Sci, 22: 123-128. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200010028x]
40. Shiranirad, A. and A. Abbasian. 2011. Evaluation of drought tolerance in winter rapeseed cultivars based on tolerance and sensitivity indices. Agriculture, 98: 41-48.
41. Shroyer, J.P. 1996. Triticale in Kansas. Kansas State University, Available online at: http://www.oznet.ksu.edu,
42. Syed, R.A. and C.E. Macdonald. 1974. Amino acid composition, protein fractions and baking quality of triticale, PP. 137-149 In: Tsen, C. C. (Ed.), Triticale: First Man-Made Cereal, AACC, St. Paul, MN.
43. Vahabzadeh, M., A. Amini, M. Ghasemi, M. Nazeri and S.H. Koohkan. 2006. Evaluation of grain yield and stability in triticale lines. Journal of Agricultural Science, 8: 69-83 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb