Volume 11, Issue 30 (9-2019)                   jcb 2019, 11(30): 37-46 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Asadi A A, valizadeh M, Mohammadi S A, Khodarahmi M. (2019). Effect of End-Season Water Deficit on Relatives of Among Physiological and Agronomical Traits in Wheat. jcb. 11(30), 37-46. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.30.37
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-998-en.html
Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zanjan, Iran
Abstract:   (2466 Views)
In order to investigate the relationship between agronomic and morphological traits affecting wheat yield, two genotypes of wheat (Gasspard cultivar and DN11 line), along with generations of crosses (F1, F2, F3, BC1 and BC2), were examined in a randomized complete block design with three replications in normal and water deficit conditions in two consecutive years in the field of Research Institute of Nuclear Agriculture of Karaj. Stepwise regression analysis showed that straw yield was the first trait that entered the model and alone explained 46% and 65% of grain yield per plant in normal and water deficit conditions, respectively. Following this trait, under normal conditions, number of grain per spike, 100 grain weight, number of tiller per plant and number of spikes per plant had the high effect on grain yield per plant, explained about 78% of the total variation. In water deficit condition, the number of grain per spike, number of spikes per plant, 100 grain weight and days to maturity justified 92% of the grain yield per plant. The results of path analysis showed that in normal conditions, 100 grain weight, grain number per spike, tiller number per plant, straw yield and number of spike per plant and in water deficit condition, number of spike per plant, number of grain per spike, 100 grain weight and straw yield had the most direct effect on grain yield per plant.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1172 kb]   (670 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2018/10/3 | Revised: 2019/08/31 | Accepted: 2019/03/9 | Published: 2019/09/11

References
1. Abdel-Sabour, M.S., A.M. Hassan, A.A. Abdeltraits, H.S. Shafi and A.A. Hamada. 1996. Genetic analysis of diallel crosses in bread wheat under different environmental conditions in Egypt. Indian Genetic, 56(1): 49-61.
2. Ali Mohammadi, M., A.M. Rezaei and S.A.M. Mir Mohammadi Meybody. 2009. Evaluation of some physiological traits and grain yield of ten Iranian bread wheat cultivars under two Irrigation conditions, Water and Soil Science (Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources), 13(48): 107-120.
3. Abhari, A., S. galeshi, N. Latifi and M. kelateh Arabi, 2006. The effect of terminal drought stress on yield, yield components and amino acid of Proline genotypes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 20: 57-67 (In Persian).
4. Araus, J.L., T. Amaro, J. Voltas, H. Nakkoul and M.M. Nachit. 1998. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection criterion for grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research, 55: 209-223. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00079-8]
5. Aycicek, M. and T. Yildirim. 2006. Path coefficient analysis of yield and yield components in bread wheat genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38(2): 417-424.
6. Azizi Nia, S., M.R. Gannadha, B. Yazdi Samadi, A. Zali and A. Ahmadi. 2004. Study on the genetic diversity of the quantitative traits related to yield of synthetic wheat genotypes under irrigation and rain fed conditions. Crop Science Journal of Iran, 26(2): 281-292 (In Persian).
7. Bakhshi Khaniki, G., F. Fattahi and S. Yazdchi. 2007. Drought effects of morphological traits of 10 barley varieties in Osko area, Eastern Azarbaijan province. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 74: 108-114 (In Persian).
8. Bramel P.J., P.N. Hinnz, D.E. Green and R.M. Shibles. 1984. Use of principal factor analysis in the study of three stems termination types of soybean. Euphytica, 33: 387-400. [DOI:10.1007/BF00021136]
9. Castrillo, M. and A.M. Calcargo. 1989. Effects of water stress and re-watering on rebulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity, chlorophyll and protein contents in two cultivars of tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science, 64(6): 717-724. [DOI:10.1080/14620316.1989.11516014]
10. Chowdhry, M.A., M. Ali, G.M. Subhani and I. Khaliq. 2000. Path coefficient analysis for water use efficiency, evapo-transpiration efficiency and some yield related traits in wheat. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 3: 313-317. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2000.313.317]
11. Dagustu, N. 2008. Genetic analysis of grain yield per spike and some agronomic traits in diallel crosses of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture, 32: 249-258.
12. Dawari N.H. and O.P. Luthra. 1991. Character association studies under high and low environments in wheat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 25: 515-518.
13. Dejan, D., S. Quarrie and S. Stankovic. 2002. Characterizing wheat genetic resources for responses to drought stress. Euphytica, 307-318.
14. Dhanda, S.S. and G.S. Sethi. 1996. Genetics and interrelationships of grain yield and its related traits in bread wheat under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Wheat Information Service, 83: 19-27.
15. Ehdaie, B. and J.G. Waines. 1994. Genetic analysis of carbon isotype discrimination and agronomic characters in a bread wheat cross. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 88: 1023-1028. [DOI:10.1007/BF00220811]
16. Falconer, D.S. 1980. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2 nd. Ed. Longman, London.
17. Fisher, R.A. 1979. Growth and water limitation to dryland wheat yield in Australia: a physiological framework. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Science, 45: 83-94.
18. Gan, S. and R.M. Amasino. 1997. Making sense of senescence: molecular genetics regulation and manipulation of leaf senescence. Plant Physiology, 113: 313-319. [DOI:10.1104/pp.113.2.313]
19. Garcia, L.F., Y. Del Moral, D. Rharrabti and C. Royo. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: An oncogenic approach. Agronomy Journal, 95: 266-274. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2003.0266]
20. Ghorbani Javid, M., F. Moradi, G.A. Akbari and I. Allahdadi. 2006. The role of some metabolites on the osmotic adjustment mechanism in annual cut leaf medic (Medicago laciniata (L.) Mill) under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 8(2): 90-105 (In Persian).
21. Golabadi, M., A. Arzani and S.M. Maibody. 2008. Genetic analysis of some morphological traits in durum wheat by generation mean analysis under normal and drought stress conditions. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 24(1): 99-116 (In Persian)
22. Golparvar, A.R., I. Majidi-Harvan, F. Darvish, A. Rezaie and A. Ghasemi-Priblation, 2004. Genetic assessment of some morpho-physiology traits in bread wheat under drought stress conditions. Iranian of pajouhesh and sazandegi, 62: 90-95 (In Persian).
23. Gonzalez, F.G., G.A. Slafer and D.J. Miralles. 2003. Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheat's. Field Crops Researches, 81: 17-27. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00195-8]
24. Ikram, U.H. and L. Tanach. 1991. Diallel analysis of grain yield and other agronomic traits in durum wheat. Rachis, 10: 8-13.
25. Innes, P., J. Hoogendoorn and R.D. Blackwell. 1985. Effects of differences in date of ear emergence and height on yield of winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 105: 543-549. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859600059438]
26. Joshi, B.K. 2003. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and yield components in F1 hybrids rice and their parents. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 28(4): 533-540.
27. Kamalizadeh, M., A.H. Hosseinzadeh and H. Zeinali Khaneghah. 2013. Evaluation of inheritance for some quantitative traits in bread wheat using generation means analysis under water deficit condition. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 44(2): 317-326 (In Persian).
28. Khaliq, I.N., M. Parveen and A. Chowdhry. 2004. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in bread wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4: 633-635.
29. Kouchaki, A.R., A. Yazdan Sepas and H.R. Nikkhah. 2006. Effect of terminal drought on grain yield and some morphological traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 8(29): 14-29 (In Persian).
30. Leilah, A.A. and A.A. Al-Khateeb. 2005. Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environments, 61: 483-496. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.011]
31. Li, G.A., Y. Sheng Hou, G.W. Wall, A. Trent, B.A. Kimball and P.J. Pinter. 2000. Free-air CO2 enrichment and drought stress effects on grain filling rate and duration in spring wheat. Crop Science, 40: 1263-70. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2000.4051263x]
32. Mohammadi, R. and E. Farshadfar. 2000. Determination of chromosomes controlling physiological traits associated to drought tolerance in rye. Iranian Journal of Crop sciences, 5(2): 117-132.
33. Moral, G.L.F., Y. Rharrabti, D. Villegas and C. Royo. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: An ontogenic approach. Agronomy Journal, 95: 266-274. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2003.0266]
34. Muller, J. 1991. Determining leaf surface area by means of linear measurements in wheat and triticale (brief report). Archiv Fuchtungsforsch, 21: 121-123.
35. Nachit, M., M. Ketata and E. Avecedo. 1991. Selection of morpho-physiological traits for multiple abiotic stresses resistance in durum wheat. Physiology breeding of winter cereal for stressed Mediterranean environments. 3-6 July 1992, Montpelieer, France, 392-400 pp.
36. Naghdipor, A., A. Khodarahmi, A. Porshahbazi and M. Eesmailzade. 2011. Factor analysis for grain yield and other traits in durum wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 7: 84-96 (In Persian).
37. Nourmand, F., M.A. Rostami, and M.R. Ghannadha. 1997. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in bread wheat. Iranian Journal of agriculture sciences, 32: 795-805 (In Persian).
38. Nourmand, F., M.A. Rostami and M.R. Ghannadha, 2001. A study of morpho-physiological traits of bread wheat, relationship with grain yield under normal and drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 32: 785-794 (In Persian).
39. Okuyama, L.A., L.C. Ferizzi and J.F.B. Neto. 2004. Correlation and path analysis of yield and its components and plant traits in wheat. Ciencica Rural, Santa Maria, 34(6): 1701-1708. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-84782004000600006]
40. Pecetti, L., P. Annicchiarico and G. Kashour. 1993. Flag leaf variation in Mediterranean durum wheat landraces and its relationship to frost and drought tolerance and yield response in moderately favorable conditions. Plant Genetic Resources, 93: 25-28.
41. Quarrie, S.A., J. Stojanovic and S. Pekic. 1999. Improving drought resistance in small-grained cereals: A case study, progress and prospects. Plant Growth Regulation, 29: 1-21. [DOI:10.1023/A:1006210722659]
42. Reynolds, M., M.J. Foulkes, G.A. Slafer, P. Berry, M.A.J. Parry, J.W. Snape and W.J. Angus. 2009. Raising yield potential in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60: 1899-1918. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erp016]
43. Richards, R.A. 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation, 20: 157-166. [DOI:10.1007/BF00024012]
44. Richards, R.A., G.J. Rebetzke, A.G. Condon and Van A.F. Herwaarden. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Science, 42: 111-131. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.0111]
45. Rodrigus, O., J.B. Hambyi, A.D. Didoneti and J. Abramo. 2007. Fifty years of wheat breeding in southern Brazil: yield improvement and associated changes. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 42: 157-168. [DOI:10.1590/S0100-204X2007000600008]
46. Saleem, U., I. Khaliq, T. Mahmood and M. Rafique. 2006. Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients between yield and yield components in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Researches, 44: 1-6.
47. Sharma, B.D., B.C. Sood and V.V. Halotra. 1991. Studies on variability, heritability and genetic advance in chickpea research, Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 3: 1-6.
48. Singh, S.P. and V.K. Diwivedi. 2002. Character association and path analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Agricultural Science Digest. 22(4): 255-257.
49. Sidell, K.J., E.L. Smith and R.W. McNew. 1979. Inheritance and interrelationship of grain yield and selected yield-related traits in a hard red winter wheat cross. Crop Science, 16: 520-52.
50. Singh, G., G. Nanda and V. Shou. 1998. Gene effects for grains per spike, grain weight and grains per spikelet in a set of nineteen crosses of wheat. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 58: 83-89.
51. Turner, N.C. 1986. Adaptation to water deficits: a changing perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13: 175-190. [DOI:10.1071/PP9860175]
52. Yin, X., S.D. Chasalow, P.M. Stam, J. Kropff, C.J. Dourleijn, I. Bos and P.S. Bindraban. 2002. Use of component analysis in QTL mapping of complex crop traits: a case study on yield in barley. Plant Breeding. 121(4): 314-319. [DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.729117.x]
53. Zeinali, H., A. Nasrabadi, H. Hoseinzadeh, R. Chogan and M. Sabokdast. 2005. Factor analysis on spatial corn varieties. Crop Science Journal of Iran, 36(4): 895-902 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb