Volume 9, Issue 23 (12-2017)                   jcb 2017, 9(23): 146-156 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tarighaleslami M, Kafi M, Nezami A, Zarghami R. (2017). Examining Interactions of Chilling and Draught Stresses on Chlorophyll (SPAD), RWC, Electrolyte Leakage and Seed Performance in Three Hybrid Varieties of Maize. jcb. 9(23), 146-156. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.23.146
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-883-en.html
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Abstract:   (4284 Views)
Chlorophyll, RWC, electrolyte leakage and seed performance of three maize hybrid varieties under draught and chilling stress conditions were examined.  The experiment was carried out in split-split plots using random completely blocks design with three replications in 2013-2014 in research farm and greenhouse Mashhad University of Ferdowsi, Agronomy Faculty. The main plot was chilling stress at two levels (present and absence of chilling stress); the subplot were drought stress at three levels (100% irritation, 75% irritation, and 50% irritation); sub-subplot was maize hybrid variety (single cross 704, single cross 400, and single cross 260).  Results showed that stress conditions affected SPAD so that draught stress declined RWC and stability of cytoplasm membrane. The highest RWC and stability of cytoplasmic membrane were seen in single cross 260 and 400.  Mutual effects of the treatments showed that the chilling and 100% irritation single cross 704 treatments had the highest SPAD. In addition, SPAD, RWC, and electrolyte leakage at the end of season decreased relative to the emergence time of male inflorescence. In presence of chilling and draught stresses, single cross 400 had higher performance comparing with the two other hybrids. This, in turn, indicates better performance of such treatment comparing with the other hybrids.
Full-Text [PDF 884 kb]   (2963 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/12/23 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2017/12/23 | Published: 2017/12/23

References
1. Abd El-Rahim, M.F., G. Fahmy and Z.M. Mand Fahmy. 1998. Alterations in transpiration and stem vascular tissues of two maize cultivares under conditions of water stress and late wilt disease. Plant. Pathology, 47: 216-223. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-3059.1998.00211.x]
2. Afarinesh, A., Gh. Fathi, S. Siadat, Kh. Alami Saeed and S. Ashrafzade. 2015. Effects of drought and density on some agronomic characteristics of corn. Journal of Plant Production, 38: 13-23 (In Persian).
3. Allen, R.G., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage, 56 pp.
4. Andrade, F.H. and M.A. Ferreiro. 1996. Reproductive growth of maize, sunflower and soybean at different source levels during grain filling, Fild Crop Research, 48: 155-165. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01017-9]
5. Andjelkovic, V. and R. Thompson. 2006. Changes in gene expression in maize kernel in response to water and salt stress. Plant Cell Reports, 25: 71-79. [DOI:10.1007/s00299-005-0037-x]
6. Atteya, A.M. 2003. Alteration of water relations and yield of corn genotype in response to drought stress. Plant Physiology, 29: 63-76.
7. Ayvazi, M., S. Sajedi, N. Gharayazi and M. Jirani. 2010. Effects of water stress on characteristics of different corn hybrids. Journal of Agricultural new findings, 3: 75-286 (In Persian).
8. Brevedan, R.E. and D.B Egli. 2003. Short periods of water stress during seed filling, leaf senescence, and yield of soybean. Crop Science, 43: 2083- 2088. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2003.2083]
9. Ciganda, V., A. Gitelson and J. Schepers. 2008. Vertical profile and temporal variation of chlorophyll in maize canopy: quantitative crop vigor indicator by means of reflectance-based techniques. Agronomy Journal, 100: 1409-1417. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2007.0322]
10. Darvish balochi, M., F. Paknejad and M. Ardekani. 2011. Effect of drought stress and some micronutrients, foliar nutrition on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, relative water content, membrane stability and grain yield. Journal of Field Crop Science, 41:531-543 (In Persian).
11. Gregersen, P.L. and P.B. Holm. 2007. Transcriptome analysis of senescence in the flag leaf of wheat. Plant Biotecnology, 5: 192-206. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00232.x]
12. Ghosh, P.K., K.K. Ajay, M.C. Bandyopadhyay, K.G. Manna, A.K. Mandal and K.M. Hati. 2004. Comprative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping system in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. Dry matter yield, nodulation, chlorophyll content and enzyme activity. Bioresource Technology, 95: 85-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.012]
13. Hosseini, M.H. and M. Nasiri mahalati. 1994. The relationship between water and land in crops. 1th edn. Mashhad University Jihad Publications. Mashhad, 350 pp.
14. Huang, W., Z. Wang, L. Huang, D.W. Lamb, Z. Ma, J. Zhang, J. Wang and J. Zhaox. 2011. Estimation of vertical distribution of chlorophyll concentration by bi-directional canopy reflectance spectra in winter wheat. Precise agricultural, 12: 165-178. [DOI:10.1007/s11119-010-9166-5]
15. Hashem, A., M.N. Amin Mujadar, A. Hamid and M.M. Hossain. 1998. Drought stress effects on seed yield, yield attributes, growth, cell membrane stability of synthesized Brassica napus L. Journal agronomy and Crop Science, 180: 129-136. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00382.x]
16. Jalilian, A., R. Ghobadian, A. Shirkhani and A. Farnia. 2014. Effects of nitrogen and drought stress on yield components, grain yield and quality of SC 704 corn. Journal of Agriculture Research and Construction, 16: 102-251 (In Persian).
17. Kaman, H., C. Kirda and S. Sesveren. 2011. Genotypic differences of maize in grain yield response to deficit irrigation. Agric. Water Management, 98: 801-807. [DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.003]
18. Kirnak, H., C. Kaya, I. Tas and D. Higgs. 2001. The influence of water deficit on vegetative growth, physiology, fruit yield and quality in egg plants. Plant Physiology, 27: 34-46.
19. Kocheva, K. and G. Georgive. 2003. Evaluation of the reaction of two contrasting Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Cultivars in response to osmotic stress with Peg 6000. Journal Plant Physiology, 3: 290-294.
20. Lafitte, R. 2002. Relationship between leaf relative water content during reproductive stage water deficit and grain formation in rice. Field Crop Research, 76: 165-174. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00037-0]
21. Liang, Y., Q. Chen, W. Liu, Z. Zhang and R. Ding. 2003. Exogenous silicone (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid per oxidation in roots or salt- stressed barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.). Journal Plant Physiology, 99: 872-878.
22. Lukatkin, A., A. Brazaitye, Č. Bobinas and P. Duchovskis. 2012. Chilling injury in chilling-sensitive plants: a rev. Žemdi Agriculture, 99: 111-124.
23. Mohammadkhani, N. and R. Heidari. 2007. Effect of drought stress on protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in two maize cultivars. Pakestan Journal Biology Science, 10: 3835-3840. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2007.3835.3840]
24. Nayyar, H. and D. Gupta. 2006. Differential sensitivity of C3 and C4 plants to water deficit stress: Association with oxidative stress and antioxidants. Environmental Experimental Botany, 58: 106-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.06.021]
25. Nezami, A., J. Rezai and B. Alizade. 2011. Tolerance to cold stress in some species of Grasses by Electrolyte Leakage Test. Journal of soil and water, 5: 1019-1026 (In Persian).
26. Pessarkli, M. 1999. Hand book of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker Inc, 697 pp.
27. Pormosavi, S.M., M. Galoi and J. Daneshian. 2006. Evaluation of manure application on soybean leaf chlorophyll content and membrane stability under drought conditions. 9th Congress of Crop Sciences, pp: 205-208.
28. Raison, J.K., G.A. Berry, R.A. Armond and C.K. Pike. 1980. Membrane properties in relation to the adaptation of plants to temperature stress. In: Turner, N.C. and P.J. and Kramer. Adaptation of Plants to water and high temperature stress. John Wirly and Sons, 261-273.
29. Schlemmer, M.R., D.D. Francis, J.F. Shanahan and J.S. Schepers. 2005. Remotely measuring chlorophyll content in corn leaves with differing nitrogen levels and relative water content. Agronmy Journal, 97 pp. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2005.0106]
30. Schonfeld, M.A., R.C. Johnson, B. Carver and D.W. Morhinweg. 1988. Water relation in winter wheat as drought resistance indicator. Crop Scieance, 28: 526-531. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021x]
31. Shikhi, A., K. Afsharpor rezai, H. Rnji, S. Mosavi anzabi and M. Roshdi. 2012. Effect of drought stress on physiological traits of maize genotypes. Journal of Crop Production in Environmental Stress, 3: 1-14 (In Persian).
32. Siddique, M.R.B., A. Hamid and M.S. Islam. 2000. Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Batany Bull acadmi sinece, 41: 35-39.
33. Silva, M.D.A., J.L. Jifon, J.A.G. Da Silva and V. Sharma. 2007. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Plant Physiology, 19: 193-201. [DOI:10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003]
34. Sinclair, T.R. and M.M. Ludlow. 1985. Who thought plant thermodynamics the unfulfilled potential of plant water potential Aus. Journal Plant Physiology, 33: 312-317. [DOI:10.1071/PP9850213]
35. Singh, B.R and B.P. Singh. 1995. Agronomic and physiological responses of sorghum, maize and pearl millet to irrigation. Field Crop Research, 42: 57-67. [DOI:10.1016/0378-4290(95)00025-L]
36. Singh, T.N., D. Aspinall and L.C. paleg. 1972. Proline accumulation and varietal adaptability to drought in barley, a potential metabolic measure of drought resistance. Natural new biology, 236: 1880-1990. [DOI:10.1038/newbio236188a0]
37. Spaeth, S.C., H.C. Randau, T.R. Sinclair and J.S. Vendeland. 1984. Stability of soybean harvest index. Agronomy Journal, 76: 482-486. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030028x]
38. Stone, P.J., D.R. Wilson, J.B. Reid and G.N. Gillespie. 2001. Water deficit effects on sweet corn: I. Water use, radiation use efficiency, growth and yield. Australian Journal Agricultural Research, 52: 103-113. [DOI:10.1071/AR99146]
39. Shiri, M. and R. Choukan. 2017. Evaluation of Maize Hybrids Tolerance to Drought Stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21): 89-99. (In Persian).
40. Shahriarinasab, M., R. Choukan, M. Khodarahimi, A. Masomi and S. Khavarikhorasani. 2015. Genotype×Environment Interactionf or Grain Yield of Maize HybridsUsing the GGE Biplot. Journal of Crop Breeding, 7(16): 123-129 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb