Volume 9, Issue 23 (12-2017)                   jcb 2017, 9(23): 117-124 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khomari A, Mohammadi A. (2017). Stability Study of Yield in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Cultivars using AMMI Method. jcb. 9(23), 117-124. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.23.117
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-879-en.html
Abstract:   (4214 Views)
Genotype-environment interaction for plant breeders has been important as it is a complex issue in breeding for high yield varieties and releasing new genotypes. In order to assess adaptability and stability of sunflower varieties in different climate conditions, twelve cultivars were investigated in Karaj, Shiraz, Birjand, Kashmar and Arak in randomized complete block designs with three replications. To study genotype by environment interaction, additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was used. Analysis of additive main effects (analysis of variance) and multiplicative interaction effects (principal components analysis) revealed that the effect of environment at 1% probability level and effect of genotype - environment interaction at 5% probability level were significant and tow first  interaction principal components explained 84% of the interaction sum squares. Biplot of first interaction principle and mean yield revealed that Progress genotype had adequate yield and lowest value for first principle component. Therefore this genotype selected as a high yield and stable genotype; Record and Gabur genotypes were stable and high yield following Progress genotype. AMMI2 graph indicated that Progress, Master and Zargol in Arak and Karaj, Favorit, Record and Azargol in Shiraz, Gabur and SHF81-90 in Kashmar and Armaverski, Lakomka, Zaria and Sor in Birjand had specific adaptability. Among all genotypes, Zaria, Lakomka, SHF81-90, Gabur and Zargol had the highest general adaptability.
Full-Text [PDF 705 kb]   (1223 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/12/23 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2017/12/23 | Published: 2017/12/23

References
1. Abamuf, J. and A. Allurik. 1998. AMMI analysis of rain fed lowland rice (Oriza sativa L.) traits in Nigeria. Plant Breeding, 117: 395-397. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01961.x]
2. Anandan, A. and R. Eswaran. 2009. Genotype by environment interaction of rice (Oryza sativa L.) hybrids in the east ciast saline region of Tamil Nadu. In the Proceeding of 2ⁿd Interaction Rice Congress, 226 pp.
3. Asenjo, C.A., R. Bezus and H.J. Acciaresi. 2003. Genotype by environment interaction of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in temperate region using the joint regression analysis and AMMI methods. Cereal Res. Communi, 31: 97-104.
4. Arminian, A. and S. Houshmand. 2012. Additive Main and Multiplicative Interaction Effect in Stability Analysis of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield. Journal of Crop Breeding, 4(9): 1-13.
5. Bange, M.P., G.L. Hammer and K.G. Rickert. 1997. Environmental control of potential yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in the tropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 48: 231-240. [DOI:10.1071/A96079]
6. Becker, H.B. and J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101: 1-23. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x]
7. Cornelius, P. L. and J. Crossa. 1999. Prediction assessment of shrinkage estimators of multiplicative models for multi-environment cultivar trials. Crop Science, 39: 998-1009. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040007x]
8. Crossa, J., H.G. Gauch and R.W. Zobel. 1990. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maiz cultivar trials. Crop Science, 30: 493-500. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030003x]
9. Crossa, J., P.L. Cornelius and W. Yan. 2001. Biplot of linear-bilinear models for studying crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Science, 41: 158-163.
10. Crossa, J., P.N. Fox, W.H. Pfeiffer, S. Rajaram and H.G. Gauch. 1991. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an interaction wheat yield trial. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 81: 27-37. [DOI:10.1007/BF00226108]
11. Dehghani, H., A. Ebadi and A. Yousefi. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal, 98: 388-393. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2004.0310]
12. Ebdon, J.S. and H.G. Gauch. 2002. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turf grass performance trials: Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction. Crop Science, 42: 489-496. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.0489]
13. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific & Technical, U.K. 438pp.
14. Farshadfar, E. and J. Sutka. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat using the AMMI model. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 54: 459-467. [DOI:10.1556/AAgr.54.2006.4.8]
15. Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Genotype-by-Environment interaction, Kang MS and HG Gauch (Eds.). Boca Raton CRE CRC, New York, 85-122 pp. [DOI:10.1201/9781420049374.ch4]
16. Gower, J.C. and D.J. Hand. 1996. Biplots. Chapman and Hall, UK. 277 pp.
17. Hanamaratti, N.G., P.M. Salimth., C.H.M. Vijayakumar, R.L. Ravikumar, S.T. Kajjidoni and M.B. Chetti. 2009. Genotype stability of superior near isogenic introgression lines for productivity in upland rice. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 22: 736-740.
18. Kaiser, D.E., J.J. Wiersma and J.A. Anderson. 2014. Genotype and environment variation in elemental composition of spring wheat flag leaves. Agronomy Journal, 106: 324-336. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2013.0329]
19. Lin, C.S., M.R. Binne and L.P. Lefcovitch. 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Science, 26: 894-900. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x]
20. Kalateh-Jari, S., Kh. Mostafavi and A. Nabipour. 2014. Interaction of genotype and environment on the open pollinated sunflower (Helianthus annuus) cultivars based on parametrice methods and tai method. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(17): 114-122. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jcb.8.17.122]
21. Marinkovic, R., M. Jockovic, A. Marjanovic-Jeromela, S. Jocic, M. Ciric, I. Balalic and Z. Sakac. 2011. Seed yield and oil content in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) using AMMI model. Helia, 34: 79-88. [DOI:10.2298/HEL1154079M]
22. Mostafavi, K., R. Choukan, M. Taeb, E. Majidi Heravan and M.R. Bihamta. 2011. Genetic potential evaluation of Iranian corn inbred line using griffing diallel and AMMI model. Journal of Agricultural Research, 2: 67-79 (In Persian).
23. Nikkhah, H.R., A. Yousefi, S.M. Mortazavian and M. Arazmjoo. 2007. Analysis of yield stability of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 9: 1-12 (In Persian).
24. Peterson, C.J., M. Moffatt and J.R. Erickson. 1997. Yield stability of hybrid vs. pure line hard winter wheats in regional performance trials. Crop Science, 37: 116-120. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010019x]
25. Qadir, G., S. Ahmad, F. Ul-Hassan and M.A. Cheema. 2006. Oil and fatty acid accumulation in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) as influenced by temperature variation Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38: 1137-1147.
26. Radic, V., S. Jocic and J. Mrda. 2008. Effect of environment on the chemical composition and some other parameters of sunflower seed quality. In: Proceedings of the 17th international sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) conference, Cordoba, pp: 747-750.
27. Rondanini, D., R. Savin and A.J. Hall. 2003. Dynamics of fruit growth and oil quality of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) exposed to brief intervals of high temperature during grain filling. Field Crop Res, 83: 79-90. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00064-9]
28. Roy, D. 2000. Plant breeding analysis and exploitation of variation. Alpha Science International Ltd. U. K. 699pp.
29. Sabaghania, N., H. Dehghani and S.H. Shabaghpour. 2008. Graphic analysis of genotype×environment interaction of lentil yield in Iran. Agron, 100: 760-764. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2006.0282]
30. Salah, B., M. Ahmed, A. Wahab and H. Abdalla. 2008. Genotype×environment interaction for yield and yield components in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 16: 15-31.
31. Saeid, A., M. Moghadam and A. Mohammadi. 2005. Investigation of yield stability in rics cultivars and lines using AMMI analysis. Abstract article of 8th Iranian Congress in Agronomy and Plant Breeding. Gilan University, Rasht, 168 pp (In Persian).
32. Shafii, B. and W.J. Price. 1998. Analysis of genotype-by-environment interaction using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model and stability estimates. Journal of Agricultural, Biological. Environ. Stat, 3: 335-345. [DOI:10.2307/1400587]
33. Schoemam, L.J. 2003. Genotype x environment interaction in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in South Africa. M.SC. Thesis, department of agronomy. Faculty of agricultural. University of Free State Bloemfontein, South Africa. 200 pp.
34. Stanley, O., P.B. Samante, T. Wilson, M.M. Anna and J.C. Medley. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environment using AMMI and SREG GGE Biplot analysis. Crop Science, 45: 2414-2424. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.0627]
35. Tarakanovas, P. and V. Ruzgas. 2006. Additive main effact and multiplicative interaction analysis of grain yield of wheat varieties in Lithuania. Agronomy Research, 4: 91-98.
36. Vargas, M., J. Crossa, F. Vaneeuwijk, D.K. Sayre and M.P. Reynolds. 2001. Interpreting treatment×environment interaction in agronomy trials. Agron, 93: 949-960. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2001.934949x]
37. Yan, W., M.S. Kang, B. Ma, S. Woods and P.L. Cornelius. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science, 47: 643-655. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374]
38. Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE-biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 288 pp. [DOI:10.1201/9781420040371]
39. Yan, W. and L.A. Hunt. 2002. Biplot analtsis of multi-environment trial data, in M. S. Kang, ed. Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB international, pp: 288-303.
40. Yan, W. and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario, Crop Science, 42: 11-20. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.0011]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb