Volume 9, Issue 22 (9-2017)
jcb 2017, 9(22): 82-97 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahimi M H, Houshmand S, Khodambashi M, Shiran B, Mohammadi S. (2017). Evaluation of Recombinant Pure Lines of Lentil under Drought Stress. jcb. 9(22), 82-97. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.22.82
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-848-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-848-en.html
Mohammad Hassan Rahimi 
, Saadollah Houshmand , Mahmoud Khodambashi , Behrouz Shiran , Shahram Mohammadi
, Saadollah Houshmand , Mahmoud Khodambashi , Behrouz Shiran , Shahram Mohammadi
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shahrekord
Abstract: (4078 Views)
Lentil with high protein (up to 28%), low price and good taste, have a very important role in the human diet and known as one of the most important plants in in semi-arid and dry regions. So it seems necessary to identifing the varieties that are drought tolerant. In order to identifying drought tolerant lines in 168 recombinant pure lines derived from crosses between Hindi variety of L3685 (High yield, stand-up habit and early maturity) as the female parent and Iranian variety of Qazvin (sleeping growth habit and late maturity) as male parents, an experiment was conducted in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications under normal and drought stress conditions at experimental field of Shahrekord University in 2013-14. The results of combined analysis revealed that the differences between lines were significant in all studied traits except seed diameter (P≤0.01). The differences between normal and stress conditions and also interaction of line × stress were significant for all traits except day to flowering and seed diameter. Drought stress had the maximum effect on pod weight, seed yield and pod number and reduced them 54%, 45.3% and 42.25%, respectively, compared to the normal condition. 160, 125, 48, 129 and 103 Lines were identified as superior in terms of seed yield, biological yield, days to flowering nd pod number per plant. Correlation analysis revealed that the relationship between yield with biological yield, pod number per plant and pod weight per plant was significantly positive in two conditions, while its correlation with days to maturity was significantly negative. Stepwise regression in both environments for seed yield, showed the important and determining role of biological yield and days to maturity. The results of present study showed that identification of the high-yielding lines in normal and stress conditions and drought tolerant lines is possible. The biological yield, days to maturity, number of pods and weight per plant are very important to selection for high grain yield.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/10/9 | Revised: 2019/04/15 | Accepted: 2017/10/9 | Published: 2017/10/9
Received: 2017/10/9 | Revised: 2019/04/15 | Accepted: 2017/10/9 | Published: 2017/10/9
References
1. Abdipur, M., B. Vaezi, V. Bavei and N. Heidarpur. 2011. Evaluation of morpho-physiological selection indices to improve of drought tolerant lentil genotypes (Lens culinaris Medik) under rainfed condition. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 11: 275-281.
2. Aghili, P., A. Imani, H. Shahbazi and Y. Alaei. 2012. Study of correlation and relationships between seed yield and yield components in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Annals of Biological Research, 3: 5042-5045.
3. Aich, A., S. Aich and M. Shrivastava. 2007. Genetic variability, correlation and co-heritability studies on yield and its components in lentil. Journal of Inter academician, 11: 247- 250.
4. Alami-Milani, M., R. Amini, A.D. Mohammadinasab, A.A. Shafaghkalvanegh and J. Emaratpardaz. 2013. Yield and yield components of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) affected by drought stress and mulch. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5: 1228-1231.
5. Allahmoradi, P., C. Mansourifar, M. Saidi and S.J. Honarmand. 2013. Water deficiency and its effects on grain yield and some physiological traits during different growth stages in lentil (Lens culinaris L.) cultivars. Annals of Biological Research, 4: 139-145.
6. Amiri Deh Ahmadi, S.R., M. Parsa, A. Nezami and A. Ganjeali. 2011. he effects of drought stress at different phenological stages on growth indices of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses research, 2: 69-84 (In Persian).
7. Asadi Danalu, A., K. Ghasemi Golezani, J. Shahfagh Kolvangh and J. Bakhshi. 2014 Effectsof Seed Quality and Water Deficit on Performance of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Journal of Agricultural Knowledge and sustainable production, 1: 83-94 (In Persian).
8. Bayoumi, T.Y. 2008. Genetic diversity among lentil genotypes for drought tolerance. Journal of Agricultural Investment, 3: 25-35.
9. Bazzazi, N., M. Khodambashi and S. Mohammadi. 2013. The Effect of Drought Stress on Morphological Characteristics and Yield Components of Medicinal Plant Fenugreek. Journal f Crop Production and Processing, 3: 11-23 (In Persian).
10. Bitaraf, N., M. Khodambashi and S. Houshmand. 2010. Correlation and path analysis of grain yield and its components for lentil under Shahrekord climate. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 1: 51-56 (In Persian).
11. Blum, A. 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, 43-77.
12. Blum, A. 2002. Drought stress and its impact. Plant stress.com. [Online] Available at http://www. plantstress. com/Articles/drought_i/drought_i. htm.
13. Canci, H. and C. Toker. 2009. Evaluation of yield criteria for drought and heat resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195: 47-54. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00345.x]
14. Dalbeer, S.N., O.P. Verma and K.K. Kavita. 2013. Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis for Yield Attributes in Lentil (Lence culinaris L.). International Journal of Science and Research, 8: 158-161.
15. Demirtas, Ç., S. Yazgan, B.N. Candogan, M. Sincik, H. Büyükcangaz and A.T. Göksoy. 2010. Quality and yield response of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) to drought stress in sub-humid environment. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9: 6873-6881.
16. Dixit, R., H. Singh, S. Sunil and S. Singh. 2005. Selection criterion in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Abstracts of Fourth International Food Legumes Research Conference, pp: 18-22.
17. Ebrahimi, M., M. Golbashi, M.R. Bihamta, A. Hoseinzadeh and F. Khialparast. 2011. Evaluation of relation of grain yield with important agronomic traits of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using different analyses methods under normal and water stress conditions. Journal of Crops Improvement, 2: 27-40 (In Persian).
18. Eleweanya, N., M. Uguru, E. Ene-Obong and P. Okocha. 2007. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of grain yield related characters in maize (zea mays L.) under umudike conditions of South Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Food Environmental Extension, 4: 24-28. [DOI:10.4314/as.v4i1.1517]
19. Emam, Y., A. Shekoofa, F. Salehi and A. Jalali. 2010. Water stress effects on two common bean cultivars with contrasting growth habits. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 9: 495-499.
20. Erskine, W., A. Sarker and S. Kumar. 2011. Crops that feed the world 3. Investing in lentil improvement toward a food secure world. Food Security, 3: 127-139. [DOI:10.1007/s12571-011-0124-5]
21. FAOSTAT. 2013. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed November, 2013.
22. Farshadfar, A. and J. Javadinia. 2010. Evaluation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes for Drought Tolerance. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 4: 517-537 (In Persian).
23. Fouad, M., M. Imtiaz, S. Kumar and R. Malhotra. 2011. Breeding food legumes for enhanced drought and heat tolerance to cope with climate change. In: Solh, M. and M.C. Saxena (Eds), Food Security and Climate Change in Dry Areas. Proceedings of International Conference, pp: 244-254.
24. Ghasemi-Golezani, K., Z. Jabbarpour-Bonyadi, J. Shafagh-Kolvanagh and N. Nikpour-Rashidabad. 2013. Effects of Water Stress and hydro-priming duration on field performance of lentil. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 2: 922-925.
25. Ghassemi-Golezani, K., P. Sheikhzadeh-Mosaddegh and M. Valizadeh. 2008. Effects of Hydropriming duration and limited irrigation on field performance of chickpea. Research Journal of Seed Science, 1: 34-40. [DOI:10.3923/rjss.2008.34.40]
26. Hosseini, F.S., A. Nezami, M. Parsa and K. Hajmohammadnia Ghalibaf. 2011. Effects of Supplementary Irrigation on Yield and Yield Components of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Cultivars in Mashhad Climate. Journal of Water and Soil, 25: 625-633 (In Persian).
27. Jalilian, J. and O. Mohsennia. 2013. Effects of Superabsorbent and Irrigation Regime on Seedling Growth Characteristics of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.). Agronomical Research in Moldavia, 46: 11-19. [DOI:10.2478/v10298-012-0088-5]
28. Kakde, S., R. Sharma, A. Khillare and B. Lambade. 2005. Correlation and path analysis studies (Lens culinaris L.). Journal of Soils and Crops, 15: 67-71.
29. Khalili, M., A.P. Aboughadareh, M.R. Naghavi and S. Talebzadeh. 2012. Response of spring canola (Brassica napus L.) genotypes to water deficit stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4: 1579-1586. [DOI:10.5539/jas.v4n11p78]
30. Kumar, J., P. Basu, E. Srivastava, S. Chaturvedi, N. Nadarajan and S. Kumar. 2012. Phenotyping of traits imparting drought tolerance in lentil. Crop and Pasture Science, 63: 547-554. [DOI:10.1071/CP12168]
31. Kumar, R., S. Sharma, B. Malik, A. Dahiya and A. Sharma. 2002. Correlation studies in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Annals of Biology, 18: 121-123.
32. Muscolo, A., A. Junker, C. Klukas, K. Weigelt-Fischer, D. Riewe and T. Altmann. 2015. Phenotypic and metabolic responses to drought and salinity of four contrasting lentil accessions. Journal of experimental botany, 66(18): 5467-5480. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erv208]
33. Naroui Rad, M.R., A. Ghasemi and A. Arjmandinejad. 2009. Study of Limit Irrigation on Yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris) Genotypes of National Plant Gene Bank of Iran by Drought Resistance Indices. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 6: 352-355.
34. Narouie Rad, M.R., J. Aghaie, H.R. Fanaie and M. Ghasemie. 2008. Genetic variation in some phenological and morphological traits masses of hot and dry lentils. Journal of Research and Development, 78(4): 40-48 (In Persian).
35. Neyestani, A., A.A. Mahmood and S.H. Sabbaghpour. 2005. Path analysis of seed yield and its component in lentil. Abstract Book of the first Iranian Pulse Symposium, 677-679.
36. Nuri, M., H. Dashti, Sh. Maddah Hoseini and E. Dehghan. 2013. Genetic diversity in the gene pool lentil using morphological traits in Bardsir. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 45: 541-551.
37. Oweis, T., A. Hachum and M. Pala. 2004. Lentil production under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural water management, 68: 251-265. [DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2004.03.013]
38. Panahyan-e-Kivi, M., A. Ebadi, A. Tobeh and S. Jamaati-e-Somarin. 2009. Evaluation of yield and yield components of lentil genotypes under drought stress. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3: 456-460. [DOI:10.3923/rjes.2009.456.460]
39. Pouraboughadareh, A., M.R. Naghavi and M. Khalili. 2013. Water Defcit Stress Tolerance in Some of Barley Genotypes and Landraces under Field Conditions. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5: 249-255. [DOI:10.15835/nsb529066]
40. Rashidi, V., S. Chalbi Yani, M. Sharifi and N. Effatdoust. 2011. Comparison and Classification of Lentil (Lens culinaris) Landraces under Drought Stress Conditions after Flowering. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 20: 81-96 (In Persian).
41. Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D., M. Hassandokht, A. Kashi, A. Amri and K. Alizadeh. 2010. Genetic variability of some agronomic traits in the Iranian fenugreek landraces under drought stress and non-stress conditions. African Journal of Plant Science, 4: 12-20.
42. Saha, G.C. 2009. Mapping of foliar disease resistance genes and genes for agro-morphological traits in Lens culinaris Medik. Washington State University, 109 pp.
43. Salehi, M., A. Haghnazari, F. Shekari and A. Faramarzi. 2008. The study of seed yield and seed yield components of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) under normal and drought stress conditions. Pakistan journal of biological sciences, 11: 758-762. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2008.758.762]
44. Shahmoradi, Sh., H. Zeinali, J. Daneshian and A. Ahmadi. 2006. Effects of drought stress on qualitative and quantitative traits of soybean cultivars and advanced lines. Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of Crop Sciences, 49 pp (In Persian).
45. Silim, S., M. Saxena and W. Erskine. 1993. Adaptation of lentil to the Mediterranean environment, factors affecting yield under drought conditions. Experimental Agriculture, 27: 155-175.
46. Singh, M.K. 2014. Character Association and Path Analysis in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Trends in Biosciences, 7: 3458-3460.
47. Sreevalli, Y., K. Baskaran, R. Chandrashekara and R. Kulkarni. 2000. Preliminary observations on the effect of irrigation frequency and genotypes on yield and alkaloid concentration in periwinkle. Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences, 22: 356-358.
48. Stoddard, F., C. Balko, W. Erskine, H. Khan, W. Link and A. Sarker. 2006. Screening techniques and sources of resistance to abiotic stresses in cool-season food legumes. Euphytica, 147: 167-186. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-006-4723-8]
49. Tadayyon, A., L. Hashemi, and M. Khodambashi. 2011. Effective morphological and phenological traits on seed and biological yield in lentil genotypes in Shahrekord region. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 2: 47-62 (In Persian).
50. Talukdar, D. 2013. Comparative morpho-physiological and biochemical responses of lentil and grass pea genotypes under water stress. Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine, 4: 396-402. [DOI:10.4103/0976-9668.116983]
51. Tullu, A., I. Kusmenoglu, K. McPhee and F. Muehlbauer. 2001. Characterization of core collection of lentil germplasm for phenology, morphology, seed and straw yields. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 48: 143-152. [DOI:10.1023/A:1011254629628]
52. Wang, W., B. Vinocur and A. Altman. 2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 218: 1-14. [DOI:10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5]
53. Yadav, S., D. Phogat, I. Solanki and Y. Tomer. 2003. Characters association and path coefficient analysis in lentil. Indian Journal of Pulse Research, 16: 22-24.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
