Volume 11, Issue 29 (3-2019)
jcb 2019, 11(29): 134-142 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abedi Z, Najafi Zarrini H, Emadi S M, Bagheri N. (2019). Evaluation of Relationship between Agronomical and Physiological Traits of Soybean and Grouping of Soybean Genotypes under Different Amount of Sulfur Application. jcb. 11(29), 134-142. doi:10.29252/jcb.11.29.134
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-787-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-787-en.html
Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University
Abstract: (2780 Views)
To determine the relationships between agronomic and physiological characteristics of soybean, 30 soybean genotypes in factorial experiment based on a randomized complete block design were planted in Sari of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU). Correlation coefficients between traits showed positive and significant correlation between the considered traits and grain yield except 100- grain weight. Path analysis for grain yield showed that maximum positive direct effect is related to chlorophyll b content that imply the important role of this trait in grain yield. This trait can be used as indirect selection for genetic improvement of grain yield. Cluster analysis based on Ward method has divided the soybean genotypes into two distinct groups. The first group genotypes due to high level of traits were identified as highly valuable sources in breeding programs.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/07/26 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2017/11/18 | Published: 2019/05/8
Received: 2017/07/26 | Revised: 2019/05/14 | Accepted: 2017/11/18 | Published: 2019/05/8
References
1. Ahmad, G., A. Jan, M. Arif, M.T. Jan and R.A. Khattak. 2007. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Zhejian University Science Biology, 8(10): 731-737. [DOI:10.1631/jzus.2007.B0731]
2. Akhter, M. and C.H. Smeller. 1996. Yield and yield components of early maturing soybean genotypes in the hid south. Crop Science, 36: 866-882. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X0036000400010x]
3. AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis (16thed). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
4. AOCS. 1997. Official methods and practice of AOCS (5thed). Washington, DC: The American Oil.
5. Asghar Malik, M., I. Aziz, H. Khan, Z. Ashfaq and M. Wahid. 2004. Growth, seed yield and oil content response of canola (Brassica napus L.) to varying levels of sulfur. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 6(6): 1153-1166.
6. Azizi, A., M. Mehrpouyan and A.G. Eshghi. 2012. Comparison and grouping 17 internal and external soybean genotypes by cluster analyses. First national conference of strategies to achieve sustainable development, Tehran, Interior Ministry (In Persian).
7. Berglund, R.B. 2002. Soybean production field guide for North Dakota and northwestern minnesota. NDSU Extension Service North Dakota Soybean Council Minnesota Soybean Research and Promotion Council. 136 pp.
8. Ehyai, M. and A.A. Behbahanizadeh. 1993. Description of soil analysis methods (Volume I). Soil and Water Research Institute. Publication No. 893, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
9. Golparvar, A.R., M.R. Ghannadha, A.A. Zali and A.A. Ahmadi. 2002. Evaluation of some morphological traits as selection criteria for improvement of bread wheat. Iran. Journal of Crop Science, 4: 202-207 (In Persian).
10. Hamel Niyat, M., N. Babaeian-Jelodar, N. Bagheri and G. Kiani. 2016. Determining of correlation coefficient and path analysis of performance effective traits in mutant lines of Tarom-Mahali. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20): 198-206 (In Persian).
11. Henrique, S.B., G.P. Claudio, R. Pinto and D. Destro. 2004. Path analyses under multicollineararity in soybean. Brezilian archives of Biology and Technology, 47: 669-676. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-89132004000500001]
12. Iqbal, S., T. Mahmood, T. Muhammad, A.M. Anwar. M. Sarwar. 2003. Path coefficient analyses in different genotypes of soybean. Pakistan Journal Biology Science. 6(12): 1085-1087. [DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2003.1085.1087]
13. Jadhav, A.S., P.J. Jadhav and S.M. Bachbave. 1995. Correlation and path analyses in soybean. Journal Meharashtra Agriculture Uneversity, 20(1): 150-151.
14. Kariminia, A. and M. Shabanpour. 2003. Evaluation of sulfur oxidation potential hetrotrophic microorganisms in different soils. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 17: 69-79.
15. Khan, A., M. Hatam and A. Khan. 2000. Heritability and interrelationship among yield determining components of soybean varieties. Pakistan Journal Agriculture Research, 116: 5-8.
16. Kohkan, H., A. Mohammadi, O. Alishah and E. Hezarjaribi. 2014. Study on relationships among yield and some agronomic traits using Path Coefficient analysis in Pure lines Soybean. Agronomy Journal, 104: 29-36.
17. Lichtenthaler, H.K. and A.R. Wellburn. 1983. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Transactions, 11: 591-592. [DOI:10.1042/bst0110591]
18. Lsler, N. and M.E. Caliskan. 1998. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and some yield components of soybean grown in South Eastern Anatolia. Turkish Journal Agriculture, 22: 1-15pp.
19. Luo, Q., B. Yu and Y. Liu. 2005. Differential sensitivity to chloride and sodium ions in seedlings of Glysine max and G. soja under NaCl stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 162: 1003-1012. [DOI:10.1016/j.jplph.2004.11.008]
20. Nandan, R.D. Sweta and S.K. Singh. 2010. Character association and path analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. World Journal of Agriculture Science, 6(2): 201-206.
21. Nelson, D.W. and L.P. Sommers. 1986. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page, A. L. ED. Methods of Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, 2: 539-579.
22. Olson, S.R. and L.E. Sommers. 1990. Phosphrous. In: Page A.L. Method of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd Agron Monoger. ASA, Madison, WI, 403-431.
23. Rahman, M.N., S.M. Sayem, M.K. Alam, M.S. Islam and A.T. Mondol. 2007. Influence of sulphur on nutrient content and uptake by rice and its balance in old Brahmaputra floodplain soil. Journal of Soil Natural, 1(3): 1-10.
24. Shirastava, M.K. and R.S. Shukla. 2001. Path coefficient analysis in diverse genotype of soy bean (Glycin max L.) Adv. In plant Science, 4: 47-51.
25. Shukla, S. and K. Singh. 1998. Correlation and path analysis coefficient analysis of yield and its components in soybean. Soybean Genet New setter, 25: 67-70.
26. Siahsar, B. and A. Rezaie. 1999. Genetic and phenotypic variability and factor analysis for morphological and phenological traits in soybean (Glycine max L.) Merrill. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3(3): 61-74 (In Persian).
27. Singh, J. and H.S. Yadava. 2000. Factors determining seed yield in early generation of soybean. Crop Research Hisar, 20: 239-243.
28. Tavan, Sh. and J. Saba. 2016. Grouping wheat Lines and their group selection under rainfed conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20): 159-164 (In Persian).
29. Walky, A. and I.A. Black. 1934. An examination of degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid in soil analysis (Chemists Society).1. Experimental. Soil Science, 79: 456-465. [DOI:10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
