1. Afkhami Ghadi, A., F. Habibzadeh and S.J. Hosseini. 2021. Evaluation of Rice Genotypes from Crossing based on Salinity Stress Tolerance Indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 13(39): 108-121 (In Persian).
2. Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant physiology, 24(1): 1. [
DOI:10.1104/pp.24.1.1]
3. Bajpai, S. and R. Chandra. 2015. Effect of waterlogging stress on growth characteristics and sod gene expression in sugarcane. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(1):1-8.
4. Drew, M.C. 1997. Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annual review of plant physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 48(1): 223-250. [
DOI:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.223]
5. Else, M.A., D. Coupland, L. Dutton and M.B. Jackson. 2001. Decreased root hydraulic conductivity reduces leaf water potential, initiates stomatal closure and slows leaf expansion in flooded plants of castor oil (Ricinus communis) despite diminished delivery of ABA from the roots to shoots in xylem sap. Physiologia Plantarum, 111(1): 46-54. [
DOI:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110107.x]
6. Folzer, H., J.F. Dat, N. Capelli, D. Rieffel and P.M. Badot. 2006. Response of sessile oak seedlings (Quercus petraea) to flooding: an integrated study. Tree Physiology, 26(6): 759-766. [
DOI:10.1093/treephys/26.6.759]
7. Gilbert, R.A., C.R. Rainbolt, D.R. Morris and A.C. Bennett. 2007. Morphological responses of sugarcane to long‐term flooding. Agronomy Journal, 99(6): 1622-1628. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj2007.0085]
8. Glaz, B., S.J. Edme, J.D. Miller, S.B. Milligan and D.G. Holder. 2002. Sugarcane cultivar response to high summer water tables in the Everglades. Agronomy Journal, 94(3): 624-629. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj2002.6240]
9. Gomathi, R. and K. Chandran. 2009. Effect of waterlogging on growth and yield of sugarcane clones. Sugarcane Breeding Institute (SBI-ICAR). Quarterly News Letter, 29(4): 1-2.
10. Gomathi, R., P.N. Gururaja Rao, K. Chandran and A. Selvi. 2015. Adaptive responses of sugarcane to waterlogging stress: An over view. Sugar Tech, 17(4): 325-338. [
DOI:10.1007/s12355-014-0319-0]
11. Hashemzehi, M. 2013. Evaluation of Responses of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) Genotypes to Drought Stress Using Different Stress Tolerance Indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12: 117-118 (In Persian).
12. Jain, R., S.P. Singh, A. Singh, S. Singh, A. Chandra and S. Solomon. 2016. Response of foliar application of nitrogen compounds on sugarcane grown under waterlogging stress. Sugar Tech, 18(4): 433-436. [
DOI:10.1007/s12355-015-0406-x]
13. Khan, M.S., B. Khraiwesh, G. Pugalenthi, R.S. Gupta, J. Singh, S.K. Duttamajumder and R. Kapur. 2014. Subtractive hybridization-mediated analysis of genes and in silico prediction of associated microRNAs under waterlogged conditions in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). FEBS Open Bio, 4: 533-541. [
DOI:10.1016/j.fob.2014.05.007]
14. Malik, A.I., T.D. Colmer, H. Lambers and M. Schortemeyer. 2001. Changes in physiological and morphological traits of roots and shoots of wheat in response to different depths of waterlogging. Functional Plant Biology, 28(11): 1121-1131. [
DOI:10.1071/PP01089]
15. Misra, V., S. Solomon, A.K. Mall, C.P. Prajapati, A. Hashem, E.F. Abd Allah and M.I. Ansari. 2020. Morphological assessment of water stressed sugarcane: A comparison of waterlogged and drought affected crop. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 27(5): 1228-1236. [
DOI:10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.007]
16. Omary, M. and F.T. Izuno. 1995. Evaluation of sugarcane evapotranspiration from water table data in the everglades agricultural area. Agricultural Water Management, 27(3-4): 309-319. [
DOI:10.1016/0378-3774(95)01149-D]
17. Parent, C., A. Berger, H. Folzer, J. Dat, M. Crevècoeur, P.M. Badot and N. Capelli. 2008. A novel nonsymbiotic hemoglobin from oak: cellular and tissue specificity of gene expression. New Phytologist, 177(1): 142-154. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02250.x]
18. VanToai, T.T., S.K. St Martin, K. Chase, G. Boru, V. Schnipke, A.F. Schmitthenner and K.G. Lark. 2001. Identification of a QTL associated with tolerance of soybean to soil waterlogging. Crop Science, 41(4): 1247-1252. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.4141247x]
19. Eavis, B.W. 1972. Effects of flooding on sugarcane growth 2. Benefits during subsequent drought. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugarcane Techn,14: 715-721.
20. Yordanova, R.Y., A.N. Uzunova and L.P. Popova 2005. Effects of short-term soil flooding on stomata behavior and leaf gas exchange in barley plants, Biolgia Plantarum, 49(2): 317-319. [
DOI:10.1007/s10535-005-7319-6]
21. Yong, C., G.Ye. Min, Z. Chong-shun, Z. Xue-kun and H. Zhong. 2010. Combining ability and genetic effects of germination traits of (Brassica napus L.) under waterlogging stress conditions. Agricultural Sciences in China, 9(7): 951-957. [
DOI:10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60176-0]
22. Zhou, D., C. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Chen, S. Gao, J. Guo, W. Lu, Y. Su, L. Xu and Y. Que. 2016. Detection of bar transgenic sugarcane with a rapid and visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: 279. [
DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.00279]