دوره 13، شماره 37 - ( بهار 1400 )
جلد 13 شماره 37 صفحات 74-63 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
rahmati H, Nakhzari Moghaddam A, Rahemi Karizaki A, evarsaji Z. (2021). Evaluation of Grain Yield Stability in Advanced Genotypes of Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. Durum) using Parametric and
Non-Parametric Methods of Stability Analysis. J Crop Breed. 13(37), 63-74. doi:10.52547/jcb.13.37.63
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1170-fa.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1170-fa.html
رحمتی هوشنگ، نخ زری مقد علی، راحمی کاریزکی علی، اورسجی زینب. بررسی پایداری عملکرد دانه در ژنوتیپ‌های پیشرفته گندم دوروم (Triticum turgidum var. durum) با استفاده روش‌ها پارامتری و ناپارامتری تجزیه پایداری پژوهشنامه اصلاح گیاهان زراعی 1400; 13 (37) :74-63 10.52547/jcb.13.37.63
1- دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، ایران
2- دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، گنبدکاووس، ایران
2- دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، گنبدکاووس، ایران
چکیده: (3144 مشاهده)
ﮔﻨــﺪم دوروم ﺑــــﺎ ﻧـــــﺎم ﻋﻠﻤـــی Triticum turgidum var. durum ﺗﺘﺮاﭘﻠﻮﺋﻴــﺪ و دارای 28 ﻛﺮوﻣـﻮزوم میباشد و ﻳﻜﻲ از ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻏﻼت دﻧﻴﺎ اﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺧﺸﻚ ﺟﻬﺎن ﻛﺸﺖ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮد. معرفی ژنوتیپ‌هایی با عملکرد بیشتر، متحمل به کم‌آبی و دارای پایداری بالا یکی از ضرورت‌های توسعه کشت گندم دوروم است. اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ در محیط یکی از موضوعات مهم در برنامه‌های اصلاحی میباشد و در صورت وجود اثر متقابل باید پایداری و سازگاری ژنوتیپ‌ها در محیط‌های مختلف برای تولید محصول مطمئن ارزیابی شود. در تحقیق حاضر به‌منظور بررسی پایداری 10 ژنوتیپ گندم دوروم، آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با 3 تکرار در دو شرایط دیم و آبیاری انتهایی طی سالهای زراعی1397-1396و 1398-1397، در شهرستان کوهدشت استان لرستان انجام شد. نتایج تجزیه واریانس عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‌ها برای اجرای آزمایش در طی دوسال و در دو محیط نشان داد که تنوع معنی‌داری (01/0 p<) برای عملکرد در بین ژنوتیپ‌ها وجود داشت، اثر سال معنی‌دار نشد و اثر دو محیط در سطح 1% معنی‌دار بود، همچنین اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ× محیط نیز در سطح 1 درصد معنی‌دار شد. براساس میانگین عملکرد، Omrbi3، هانا، بهرنگ و آریا بیشترین پایداری را داشتند، اما در مقابل Dm-73-13، دهدشت، مراغه 1 و مراغه 2 کمترین پایداری را نشان دادند. پایداری ژنوتیپ‌ها با روش‌های پارامتری و ناپارامتری براساس عملکرد دانه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد، که هیچکدام از پارامترها با عملکرد همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌داری نداشتند، بنابراین ژنوتیپ‌های دارای بیشترین عملکرد براساس این پارامترها دارای پایداری بالایی نبودند. بر اساس روش‌های پارامتری دو ژنوتیپ آریا و شبرنگ دارای بیشترین پایداری و عملکرد متوسط بودند. در روش‌های ناپارامتری نیز مشاهده شد که ژنوتیپ‌های آریا، هانا و Omrbi3 که پتانسیل بالایی برای عملکرد داشتند براساس RS و kr نیز پایداری بالایی نشان دادند.
نوع مطالعه: كاربردي |
موضوع مقاله:
اصلاح براي تنش هاي زنده و غيرزنده محيطي
دریافت: 1399/7/13 | پذیرش: 1399/12/20
دریافت: 1399/7/13 | پذیرش: 1399/12/20
فهرست منابع
1. Aghaiee Sarberzeh, M., M. Dastfal, H. Farzadi, B. Andarzian, A. Shahbaz Pourshahbazi, M. Bahari and H. Rostami. 2012. Evaluation of yield and yield stability of durum wheat genotypes in hot and dry regions of Iran. Seed and Plant Breeding Journal, 28(2): 325-315.
2. Akbari, M., M. Aghaie Sarbarzeh and K.H. Mostafavi. 2014. Evaluation of yield stability of durum wheat using parametric and non-parametric methods, International Conference on New Achievements in Engineering and Basic Sciences.
3. Akbari, M., M. Aghaiee Sarberzeh and K.H. Mustafawi. 2015. Evaluation of yield stability of durum wheat using parametric and non-parametric methods. International Conference on New Achievements in Engineering and Basic Sciences, January 8-9, Odessa, Ukraine.
4. Akcura, M., Y. Kaya, S. Taner and R. Ayranci. 2006. Parametric stability analyses for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Environ, 52(6): 254-261. [DOI:10.17221/3438-PSE]
5. Ayalneh, T., T. Letta and M. Abinasa. 2013. Assessment of stability, adaptability and yield performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in south eastern Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 13(7): 885-890.
6. Badri, H., R. Mohammadi and A. etminan. 2020. Study on Adaptability and Grain Yield Stability of Durum Wheat Genotypes. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(33): 119-126 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.12.33.119]
7. Blum, A. 1996. Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulator, 20: 135-148. [DOI:10.1007/BF00024010]
8. Crossa, J. 1990. Statistical analysis of multilocation trials. Adv. Agron, 44: 55-85. [DOI:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60818-4]
9. Dabiri, Sh. 2014. Investigation of advanced bread wheat genotypes in terms of ability to re-transfer stored assimilates to grain and spike photosynthesis in rainfed and supplementary irrigation conditions. Thesis for Ph.D. Agricultural Engineering-Agriculture. Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 199 pp.
10. Dastori, A., R. Asghari and J. Shahbazi. 2014. Evaluation of yield and grain filling rate of wheat lines (Triticum aestivum L.) in two conditions without stress and drought stress after pollination. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 6(3): 561-570.
11. Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x]
12. Farahani, A. and A. Arazani. 2006. Genetic diversity of cultivars and hybrids of F1 durum wheat using agronomic and morphological parameters. Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources, 10(4): 341-354.
13. Finlay, K.W. and G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaption in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742-754. [DOI:10.1071/AR9630742]
14. Francis, T.R. and G.N. Kannenberg. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. 1×A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58: 1029-1034. [DOI:10.4141/cjps78-157]
15. Golabadi, M., A. Arzani and S. Mir Mohammadi Meybodi. 2012. Study of grain yield path coefficients and yield components in durum wheat under stress and non-stress conditions. Journal of Production and Processing of Crops and Horticulture, 2(6): 167-176.
16. Golparvar, A., S. Mottaqi and A. Lotfifar. 2011. Diall analysis of grain yield and its components in bread wheat genotypes under drought stress conditions. Plant Production Technology, 11(1): 51-61.
17. Gomaa, M. R., M. EL-Badawy, A. El Hosary, Sh. R. M. El-Areed and A. Amer. 2018. Stability analysis for yield and its components in Wheat. Egyptian Journal of Plant Breeding, 22(7): 1535-1550.
18. Jahromi, H.M.A., M. Khodarahmi, A. Mohammadi and A. Mohammadi. 2011. Yield analysis of yield of promising durum wheat genotypes in hot and dry climate of southern Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 13(2): 579-564.
19. Huehn, M. 1979. Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. Advances in Marine Biology, 10: 112-117.
20. Huehn, M. 1996. Non-parametric analysis of genotype × environment interactions by ranks. In: Kang, M.S. and H.G. Gauch (eds.) Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 213-228. [DOI:10.1201/9781420049374.ch9]
21. Ismailzadeh Moghaddam, M., M. Zakizadeh, H. Akbari Moghadam, M. Abedini Esfahalani, M. Sayyafar, A. Nikzad, S. Tabibughafari and A. Lotfali Ayneh. 2010. Study of grain yield stability and genotype-environment interaction in 20 bread wheat cultivars in some hot and dry regions of southern Iran. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 3(3): 200-179.
22. Judy, M. and S.H. Mehri. 2018. Investigation of resource-reservoir relationship in wheat by comparing weight and number of grains in old and new cultivars. Journal of Crop Plant Ecophysiology, 11(3): 469-484.
23. Kang, M.S. 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high yielding stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res. Commun, 16: 113-115.
24. Karimizadeh, R., T. Hosseinpour, J. Alt Jafarby, K. Shahbazi Homonlo, M. Armion and P. Sharifi. 2020. Stability Analysis of Durum Wheat Genotypes by GGE Biplot Method. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(35): 1-17 (In Persian).
25. Karimizadeh, R., M. Mohammadi, J. Alt Jafarbay and T. Hosseinpour. 2014. Evaluation of grain yield stability of durum wheat genotypes using classical parametric methods, 13th Iranian Conference on Plant Science and Plant Breeding and 3rd Science Conference and Seed Technology of Iran, Karaj.
26. Ketata, H.Y., S.K. Yau and M. Nachit. 1989. Relative consistency performance across environments. International Symposium on Physiology and Breeding of Winter Cereals for stressed Mediterranean Environments. Montpellier, France, 391-400.
27. Khaksar, N., A. Farshadfar and R. Mohammadi. 2013. Evaluation of advanced durum wheat genotypes based on drought tolerance indices. Cereal Research, 3(4): 267-279.
28. Kilici, H., M. Akcura and H. Aktas. 2010. Assessment of Parametric and Non-parametric Methods for Selecting Stable and Adapted Durum Wheat Genotypes in Multi-Environments. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj, 38(3): 271-279.
29. Kobriaei, A., A. Yazdan Sepas, S. Keshavarz, M. Bi Hemta and T. Najafi Mirk. 2007. Stability of grain yield in promising winter and intermediate wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 9(3): 236-225.
30. Madani, H.A., A.A. Jafari, H. Safari and H. Shirvani. 2017. Study of forage yield stability in extensions of Agropyron trichophorum with AMMI model and other methods of stability analysis in both stress and non-stress environments. Genetic research and breeding of rangeland and forest plants in Iran, 25(2): 371-358.
31. Moghadam, A. and Z. Dehghanpour. 2001. Interrelationship among several stability statistics estimated in Maize yield trials. Seed and Plant, 17(3): 329-338.
32. Moghaddasi, L., V. Rashidi and Z. Hagighi. 2009. Effect of drought stress on grain yield and some morphological traits in durum wheat lines. Scientific Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, 3(12): 41-53
33. Mohammadi, R. and A. Amri. 2008. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica, 159: 419-432. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-007-9600-6]
34. Mohammadi, R., M. Armion, B. Sadeghzadeh, S. Golkari, G. Khalilzadeh, H. Ahmadi, G. Abedi Asl, and M. Eskandari. 2016. Evaluation of grain yield stability and compatibility of durum wheat breeding lines. Journal of Agricultural Applied Research, 29(4): 42-25.
35. Mohammadi, R., E. Farshadfar and A. Amri. 2016. Comparison of rank-based stability statistics for grain yield in rainfed durum wheat. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 44(1): 25-40. [DOI:10.1080/01140671.2015.1100126]
36. Naghavi, M.R., M. Moghaddam, M. Torchi and M.R. Shakiba. 2016. Evaluation of spring wheat cultivars based on drought resistance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(17): 207-192 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.8.18.64]
37. Najafi Mirak, T., M. Dastfal, H. Farzadi, M. Sayyahfar and B. Andarzian. 2020. Study of Durum Wheat Yield Stability in Warm Zone of Iran under Normal and Drought Stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(35): 80-90.
38. Najafimirk, T., M. Dastfal, B. Andarzian, H. Farzadi, M. Bahari and H. Zali. 1397. Stability analysis of performance of promising durum wheat lines in hot and dry areas using parametric and non-parametric methods. Journal of Production and Processing of Crops and Horticultural Products, 8(2): 96-79. [DOI:10.29252/jcpp.8.2.79]
39. Nawabpur, S. and G. Kazemi. 2013. Comparison of different wheat cultivars and study of the relationships between their traits using univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Journal of Crop Production, 6(1): 191-203.
40. Nikseresht, R., A. Mohammadi, A. Majidi Herwan and K.H. Mustafawi. 2014. Investigation of advanced bread wheat lines in both stress and non-stress conditions (F7). Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 6(1): 97-107.
41. Pinthus, M.J. 1973. Estimate of genotype-value: A proposed method. Euphytica, 22: 121-123. [DOI:10.1007/BF00021563]
42. Rashid, T., S. Haider Shah, G. Karim, S. Munawar Shah and M. Yaseen. 2015. Yield Stability Analysis of Wheat Genotypes in Large Number of Environments Using Univariate Parametric Statistical Models. Lasbela, University Science and Technology, 130-143.
43. Sadeghzadeh ahri, D., S. Bahrami and H. Pashapur. 2006. Evaluation of germplasm growth habit of durum wheat and its relationship with some agronomic traits and grain yield in cold dryland areas. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3: 601-611.
44. Sadeghzadeh ahri, D., A. Rouhi, H. Pashapur, K. Soleimani and G.H. Abedi Asl. 2011. Evaluation of adaptation and stability of grain yield of bread wheat genotypes in cold rainfed areas. Journal of Crop Science Research, 3(12): 146-127.
45. Sadeghzadeh, B., R. Mohammadi, H. Ahmadi, G. Abedi Asl, M.M. Ahmadi, M. Mohammadfam, N. Bahrami, M. SH. Khaledian and A.A. Naseri. 2019. Evaluation of compatibility and stability of grain yield of durum wheat lines under dryland conditions using GGE bioplot and AMMI. Environmental stresses in agricultural sciences, 11(2): 260-241.
46. Sharifatbar, M.M., M. Ismailzadeh Moghadam, M. Khodarahmi and R. Bozorgipour. 2014. Investigation of grain yield stability and relationship between some agronomic traits in durum wheat genotypes. Journal of Production and Processing of Crops and Horticultural Products, 4(14): 120-111.
47. Shukla, G. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245. [DOI:10.1038/hdy.1972.87]
48. Soleimanifard, A. and R. Naseri. 1392. Genetic diversity of durum wheat genotypes in terms of agronomic traits under rainfed conditions. Eco physiology of Crops, 7(4): 469-478.
49. Thennarasu, K. 1995. On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype-environment interactions and yield stability. PhD thesis. New Delhi, India; PJ School, IARI.
50. Trethowan, R.M. and M. Reynolds. 2007. Drought resistance: genetic approaches for improving productivity under stress. Wheat Production in Stressed Environments, 289-299. [DOI:10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_37]
51. Wricke, G. 1962. Über eine Methode zür Erfassung der Okologischen streubreite in Feldresuchen. Z. Pflanzen-Zuchtg, 47: 92-96.
52. Yan, W. and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot Analysis of Test Sites and Trait Relations of Soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42: 11-20. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.1100]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
