Volume 9, Issue 24 (3-2018)                   jcb 2018, 9(24): 79-86 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Omrani B, Moharramnejad S. Study of Salinity Tolerance in Four Maize (Zea Mays L.) Hybrids at Seedling Stage . jcb. 2018; 9 (24) :79-86
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-938-en.html
Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz
Abstract:   (1488 Views)
     Salinity stress is one of the most important abiotic stresses that effects on many agronomic, nutritional, physiological and biochemical processes of crops. A factorial experiment based on completely randomize design with four replications under laboratory conditions with four maize hybrids (SC640, SC704, SC740 and SC Simon) and three levels of salt stress (0, 100 and 200 mM NaCl) was carry out in seedling stage. Dry weight and plant height of maize seedlings significantly decreased under salinity stress, so SC 704 and SC-Simon showed significantly smaller reduction than SC640 and SC740 under salinity stress. Salt stress was declined chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll compared with control. Anthocyanin and carotenoid were different responses to salinity stress. Relative water content (RWC) was decreased under salinity stress, but between maize hybrids were not differed significantly from this water relation attribute. K+ increased in all maize hybrid seedlings, accumulation of K+ dependent to Na+ influx. In other words, the hybrids that accurate high Na+ was have more K+ content. Glycine betaine and proline contents were enhanced under salt stress. SC 704 and SC Simon were tolerant to salinity. 
 
 
Full-Text [PDF 473 kb]   (2035 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2018/03/10 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2018/03/10 | Published: 2018/03/10

References
1. Ahmadi, K., H. Gholoxadeh, H. Abaszadeh, R. Hosseionpour, F. Hatami, B. Fazli, A. Kazemiyan and M. Rafiye. 2014. Agriculture Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture Press, 169 pp (In Persian).
2. Ali, Q. and M. Ashraf. Exogenously applied glycinebetaine enhances seed and seed oil quality of maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71: 249-259. [DOI:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.12.009]
3. Aliu, S., I. Rusinovci, S. Fetahu, B. Gashi, E. Simeonovska and L. Rozman. 2015. The effect of salt stress on the germination of maize (Zea mays L.) seeds and photosynthetic pigments. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 105: 85-94. [DOI:10.14720/aas.2015.105.1.09]
4. Ashraf, M. 2009. Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnology Advance, 27: 84-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003]
5. Ashraf, M. and M.R. Foolad. 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59: 206-216. [DOI:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006]
6. Ashraf, M. and R. Humera. 2001. Inducing salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) through seed priming with chloride salts: Growth and ion transport at early growth stages. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 23: 407-414. [DOI:10.1007/s11738-001-0050-9]
7. Askary, M., A.A. Maghsoudi Moud and V.R. Saffari. 2013. Investigation of some physiological characteristics and grain yield of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids under salinity stress. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 3: 93-104.
8. Bates, L.S., R.P. Waldren and I.D. Teare. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205-207. [DOI:10.1007/BF00018060]
9. Cechin, I., N. Corniani, T.F. Fumis and A.C. Cataneo. 2010. Differential responses between mature and young leaves of sunflower plants to oxidative stress caused by water deficit. Ciencia Rural, 40: 1290-1294. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-84782010000600008]
10. Chen, J., W. Xu, J. Velten, Z. Xin and J. Stou. 2012. Characterization of maize inbred lines for drought and heat tolerance. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 67: 354-364. [DOI:10.2489/jswc.67.5.354]
11. El Sayed, H.E.S.A. 2011. Influence of salinity stress on growth parameters, photosynthetic activity and cytological studies of Zea mays, L. plant using hydrogel polymer. Agriculture Biological Journal, 2: 907-920. [DOI:10.5251/abjna.2011.2.6.907.920]
12. Farooq, M., T. Aziz, S.M.A. Basra, M.A. Cheema and H. Rehman. 2008. Chilling tolerance in hybrid maize induced by seed priming with salicylic acid. Blackwell Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194: 161-168. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00300.x]
13. Gaber, M.A. 2010. Antioxidative defense under salt stress. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 5: 369-374. [DOI:10.4161/psb.5.4.10873]
14. Giancarla, V., E. Madosa, S. Ciulca, R. Coradini, C. Iuliana, M. Mihaela and A. Lazar. 2013. Influence of water stress and salt stress on the chlorophyll content in barley. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry Biotechnology, 17: 223-228.
15. Gill, S.S. and N. Tuteja. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48: 909-930. [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016]
16. Grieve, C.M. and S.R. Grattan. 1983. Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quaternary ammonium compounds. Plant Soil, 70: 303-307. [DOI:10.1007/BF02374789]
17. Jiang, C., Q. Cui, K. Feng, D. Xu, C. Li and Q. Zheng. 2016. Melatonin improves antioxidant capacity and ion homeostasis and enhances salt tolerance in maize seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 82: 1-9. [DOI:10.1007/s11738-016-2101-2]
18. Kaymakanova, M., N. Stoeva and T. Mincheva. 2008. Drought stress and its effect on physiological response of sunflower. Central Europe Agriculture, 9: 749-756.
19. Merah, O. 2014. Potential importance of water status traits for durum wheat improvement under water deficit stress. Journal of Agricultural Science, 137: 139-145. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859601001253]
20. Moharramnejad, S., O. Sofalian, M. Valizadeh, A. Asgari and M.R. Shiri. 2015. Proline, glycine betaine, total phenolics and pigment contents in response to osmotic stress in maize seedlings. Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 4: 313-319.
21. Moharramnejad, S. and M. Valizadeh. 2015. Variation of pigment content and antioxidant enzyme activities in pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings under salt stress. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 9: 153-166 (In Persain).
22. Mozafar, A. and J.R. Goodin. 1986. Salt tolerance of two different drought-tolerant wheat genotypes during germination and early seedling growth. Plant and Soil Science, 96: 303-316. [DOI:10.1007/BF02375135]
23. Munns, R., R.A. James and A. Lauchli. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 57: 1025-1043. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erj100]
24. Noreen, Z. and M. Ashraf. 2009. Assessment of variation in antioxidative defense system in salt-treated pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars and its putative use as salinity tolerance markers. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166: 1764-1774. [DOI:10.1016/j.jplph.2009.05.005]
25. Nasrolah alhossini, M., A. Rahmani and S. Khavari Khorasani. 2013. Investigating seed germination indices and absorption rate of sodium, chloride, calcium and potassium in different parts of sweet corn KSC 403 (Zea Mays L var. Saccharata) seedlings under salinity stress and seed priming. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 7: 357-372 (In Persain).
26. Tambussi, E.A., S. Nogues and J.L. Araus. 2005. Ear of durum wheat under water stress: Water relations and photosynthetic metabolism. Planta, 221: 446-458. [DOI:10.1007/s00425-004-1455-7]
27. Yaryura, P., G. Cordon, M. Leon, N. Kerber, N. Pucheu, N. Rubio, G. Garc and G. Lagorio. 2009. Effect of phosphorus deficiency on reflectance and chlorophyll fluorescence of cotyledons of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195: 186-196. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00359.x]
28. Zlatev, Z. and F.C. Lidon. 2012. An overview on drought induced changes in plant growth, water relations and photosynthesis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 24: 57-72. [DOI:10.9755/ejfa.v24i1.10599]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb