Volume 9, Issue 24 (3-2018)
jcb 2018, 9(24): 144-151 |
Back to browse issues page
Hossein ali Fallahi 
, Shapour Ebrahimnejad , Hossein Sabouri , Iraj Lakzadeh , Marefat Ghasemi , Shirali Kohkan
, Shapour Ebrahimnejad , Hossein Sabouri , Iraj Lakzadeh , Marefat Ghasemi , Shirali Kohkan
Horticulture Crops Research Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sari
Abstract: (3634 Views)
For assessment of genotype × environment (G × E) interaction effects and determination of the most sustainable genotypes 20 barely lines were analyzed in at eight different experimental field stations. The experiments were performed based on Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates. Grain yield was obtained and the results of the combined analysis of variance revealed genotype, environment and genotype × environment interaction effects were highly significant. Genotypes yield means showed that the G1, G13 and G4 genotypes had the highest grain yield. AMMI model analysis was used to determine the magnitude and significance of the genotype × environments interactions and divided G×E interaction to two principle components that explained 46/48% and 19/52% of interaction effects respectively and residuals. Based on biplot and AMMI analysis G, G genotypes were selected as candidate's lines with both best performance and grain yield sustainability. The environment E5 with high IPCA 1 and low IPCA 2 had the highest effect on determination of genotypes. The genotype G20 was selected as candidate line with high grain yield performance and stability.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2018/03/10 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2018/03/10 | Published: 2018/03/10
Received: 2018/03/10 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2018/03/10 | Published: 2018/03/10
References
1. Ali Akbarpour, O., H. Dehghani and B. Sorkhi laleh lou. 2011. Investigating univariate and multivariate stability parameters of barley (Hordeum voulgare L.) promising genotypes in cold climate of Iran. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 42: 23-32 (In Persian).
2. Askarinia, P., G. Saeidi and A. Rezai. 2009. Pattern analysis of genotype × field environments interaction for grain yield in wheat using AMMI method. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 2: 75-90 (In Persian).
3. Das, S., R.C. Misra, M.C. Patnaik and S.R. Das. 2010. GxE interaction, adaptability and yield stability of mid-early rice genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 44: 104-111.
4. Fattahi, F. and A. Yousefi. 2006. The assessment of stability of barely yield genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) using replicable stability parameters and pattern analysis with AMMI model. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 37: 317-326 (In Persian).
5. Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang, M. S. and H. G. Jr. Gauch (eds), Genotype- by -environment interaction. (pp: 85-122). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 344 pp. [DOI:10.1201/9781420049374.ch4]
6. Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science, 37: 311-326. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020002x]
7. Koocheki, A.R., B. Sorkhi and M.R. Eslamzadeh Hesari. 2013. Study on Stability of Elite Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes for Cold Regions of Iran Using AMMI Method. Cereal Research, 2: 249-261.
8. Mohammadi, R., M. Armivan and M.M. Ahmadi. 2011. Genotype × Environment Interactions for Grain Yield of Durum Wheat Genotypes Using AMMI Model. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 27: 183-198 (In Persian).
9. Mostafavi, K., S. Hosseini Imeni and M. Zare. 2010. Stability Analysis of Rice Genotypes Based GGE biplot Method in North of Iran. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 7: 1690-1694 (In Persian).
10. Nikkhah, H.R., A. Yousefi, S.M. Mortazavian and M. Arazmjoo. 2007. Analysis of yield stability of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes- using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 9: 1-13 (In Persian).
11. Payne, R.W. 2009. "Genstat". Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 1 (2): 255-258 [DOI:10.1002/wics.32]
12. Samonte, S.O.PB., L.T. Wilson, A.M. McClung and J.C. Medley. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Science, 45: 2414-2424. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.0627]
13. Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 269 pp. [DOI:10.1201/9781420040371]
14. Yan, W. and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42: 11-20. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.0011]
15. Yan, W., M.S. Kang, B.M.S. Woods and P.L. Cornelius. 2007. GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data. Crop Science Society of America, 47: 641-653. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374]
16. Zobel, R.W., M.J. Wright and H.G. Gauch. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy, 80: 388-393. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |