Volume 9, Issue 23 (12-2017)
jcb 2017, 9(23): 157-165 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Omrani S, Naji A M, Esmaeilzadeh Moghaddam M. (2017). Yield Stability Analysis of Promising Bread Wheat Lines in Southern Warm and Dry Agro Climatic Zone of Iran using GGE Biplot Model. jcb. 9(23), 157-165. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.23.157
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-884-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-884-en.html
Shahed University, Tehran
Abstract: (4230 Views)
In order to investigate the responses of promising bread wheat lines to different environmental conditions and determine of the stability of their grain yield, one experiment was done with 30 bread wheat genotypes and two commercial wheats as checks using alpha lattice design with four replications in six experimental research stations in southern warm and dry climatical zones in Iran (Ahvaz, Darab, Dezful, Iranshahr, Khorramabad and Zabol) during 2013-14 and 2014-15 cropping seasons. The results confirmed that the effects of environment, genotype and interaction between them was significant at the 1% statistical level. The highest of grain yield devoted to t the lines no. 13 and 21, with 6.121 and 6.219 t/ha and the line no. 20 with 4.029 t/ha had the lowest the grain yield in this study. For studying of the genotype × environment effect and determine the stable genotypes, GGE Biplot method was used. Based on the polygonal figure, studied locations grouped in 4 mega-environments. Based on the results, the genotypes 31 for khorramabd, genotype 21 for Iranshahr, genotype 13 for Darab, Dezful and Ahvaz, and genotype 17 for Zabol, had specific adaptability. Dezful and Darab was the superior and Khorramabd was the poorest sites in this study respectively. In this study four promising lines including, genotypes no. 11,13,21 and 14 with wide adaptability and genotypes no. 18,19, 20 and 25 recognize with low adaptability respectively.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/12/23 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2017/12/23 | Published: 2017/12/23
Received: 2017/12/23 | Revised: 2019/04/14 | Accepted: 2017/12/23 | Published: 2017/12/23
References
1. FAOSTAT Database. 2014. FAO, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Washington. http: // faostat3.fao.org/ site/ 291/ default. aspx.
2. Singh, R.P and R. Trethowan. 2007. Breeding spring bread wheat for irrigated and rainfed production systems of the developing world. In: Kang, M. and Priyadarshan, P.M. (eds.). Breeding major food staples. Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, USA.
3. Farshadfar, E., M. Mohammadi, M. Aghaee and Z. Vaisi. 2012. GGE biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in wheat-barley disomic addition lines. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(6):1074-1079.
4. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46: 1488-1500. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193]
5. Yan, W., M.S. Kang, B. Ma, S. Woods and P. Cornelius. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-byenvironment data. Crop Science, 47: 643-653. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374]
6. Karimizadeh, R., M. Mohammadi, N. Sabaghnia and M. K Shefazadeh. 2012. Using Huehn's Nonparametric Stability Statistics to Investigate Genotype × Environment Interaction. Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 40: 195-200. [DOI:10.15835/nbha4017593]
7. Crossa, J., P.N. Fox, W.H. Pfeiffer, S. Rajaram and H.G. Gauch. 1991. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 81: 27-37. [DOI:10.1007/BF00226108]
8. Gauch, H.G., H.P. Piepho and P. Annicchiarico. 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Science, 48:866-889. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0513]
9. Makumbi, D., A. Diallo, K. Kanampiu, S. Mugo and H. Karaya. 2015. Agronomic performance and genotype x environment interaction of herbicide-resistant maize varieties in Eastern Africa. Crop Science, 55: 540-555. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0593]
10. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. sheng and Z. Szlavincs. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40: 597-605. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x]
11. Yan, W. and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Genetic and environmental causes of genotype environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41: 19-25. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.41119x]
12. Yan, W. and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42: 11-20. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.0011]
13. Dehghani, H., N. Sabaghnia and M. Moghaddam. 2009. Interpretation of genotype-by-environment interaction for late maize hybrids' grain yield using a biplot method. Turk Journal Agriculture Forces, 33: 139-148.
14. Dehghani, H., A. Ebadi and A. Yousefi. 2006. Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal 98: 388-393. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2004.0310]
15. Blanche, S.B. and G.O. Myers. 2006. Identifying discriminating locations for cultivar selection in Louisiana. Crop Science, 46: 946-949. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.0279]
16. Mohammadi, R., M. Armion, H. Esmail zad, M.M. Ahmadi and D. Sadegh zadeh ahari. 2012. Genotype × Environment interaction for grain yield of rainfed durum wheat using the GGE bipot model. Seed and plant improvement journal, 3(28): 503-518 (In Persian).
17. Koocheki, A.R., B. Sorkhi and M.R. Eslam zadeh hesari. 2012. Yield stability of barley elite genotypes in cold regions of Iran using GGE biplot. Seed and plant improvement journal, 4(28): 533-543 (In Persian).
18. Tarinejad A. R. and M. S. Abedi. 2015. Investigation on the grain yield stability of promising cold region bread wheat cultivars and lines by using different stability statistics. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 2(9): 257-292.
19. Kendal, E. 2016. GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment yield trials in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Ekin J, 2(1): 90-99.
20. Yang, R., J. Crossa, P. Cornelius and J. Bugueno. 2009. Biplot analysis of genotype x environment interaction: Proceed with caution. Crop Science, 49: 1564-1576. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2008.11.0665]
21. Samonte, S.O.P.B., A.M. Wilson, McClung and J.C. Medley. 2005. Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using ammi and sreg gge biplot analysis. Crop Science, 45: 2414-2424. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2004.0627]
22. Kaya,Y., M. Akcura and S. Taner. 2006. GGE-biplot analysis of multi environment yield trials in bread wheat. Turkish Journa Agriculture Forestry, 30: 325-337.
23. Sabaghnia, N., H. Dehghani and S.H. Sabaghpour.2008. Graphic Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Lentil Yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal, 100: 760-764. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2006.0282]
24. Shahryari Nasab, M., R. Chogan, M. Khodarahmi, A. Masomi and S. Khavari. 2016. Genotype× Environment Interaction for Grain Yield of Maize Hybrids Using the GGE Biplot. Journal of Crop Breeding, 7(16): 123-129.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
