Volume 9, Issue 22 (9-2017)
jcb 2017, 9(22): 53-62 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghanbari A A, Mozafari H, Hassanpour Darvishi H. (2017). Identification of Effective Traits on the Yield in bean Genotypes using Multivariate Statistical Methods. jcb. 9(22), 53-62. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.22.53
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-842-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-842-en.html
Agronomy Dept., Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (3896 Views)
To investigate some quantitative and qualitative traits of genotypes a field study was performed as augmented experiment consisting four checks (Sadri, Koosha, KS21676 and KS21682) and138 genotypes. Vegetative, morphological and agronomical characteristics as well as traits related to pod and seed were studied. Statistical analysis showed that number of seeds per plant and plant height had the greatest variations. Genotypes had significant differences in all growth stages, yield and yield components. Correlation analysis revealed that five traits including days to emergence of the first trifoliate leaf (V3), plant height, plant type, seeds per pod and grain marketing were significantly correlated with grain yield. Five traits entered into the model based on stepwise regression analysis that were plant type, seeds per pod, grain filling duration (GFD), V3 and grain marketing. Path analysis results indicated a high direct effect of plant type on grain yield. Due to available direct effects, it was recommended seeds per pod, GFD, V3 and grain marketing for breeding programs. Overall, due to path analysis results, can be said that the characteristics plant type, seeds per pod and GFD were the most effective direct factors in grain yield variations. Factor analysis using principal component method showed that seven main factors explained more than 76% of the total variation.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/10/9 | Revised: 2019/04/15 | Accepted: 2017/10/9 | Published: 2017/10/9
Received: 2017/10/9 | Revised: 2019/04/15 | Accepted: 2017/10/9 | Published: 2017/10/9
References
1. Abebe, A., M.A. Brick and R.A. Kirkby. 1998. Comparison of selection indices to identify productive dry bean lines under diverse environmental conditions. Field Crops Research, 58: 15-23. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00082-3]
2. Acosta-Diaz, E., J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, C. Trejo-Lopez, J.S. Padilla-Ramirez and D. Amador-Ramirez. 2009. Adaptation traits in dry bean cultivars grown under drought stress. AgricultureaTecnicaMexica, 35: 419-428.
3. Acosta-Gallegos, J.A. and J.W. White. 1995. Phenological plasticity as an adaptation by common bean to rainfed environments. Crop Science, 35: 199-204. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010037x]
4. Acquach, G.M., W. Adams and J.D. Kelly. 1992. A factor analysis of plantvariables associated with architecture and seed size in dry bean. Euphytica, 60: 171-177.
5. Amini, A., M.R. Ghannadha and S. Abdemishani. 2000. Factor analysis for morphological and phenological traits in common bean. Seed and Plant Journal, 16: 210-225 (In Persian).
6. Arya, P.S., A. Rana and A. Rana. 1999. Study of direct and indirect influence of some yield traits on green pod yield in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Advanced Horticulture and Forestry, 6: 99-106.
7. Asadi, B., H.R. Dorri, and S. Vaezi. 2005. Study of genetic diversity of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes by multivariate analysis methods. 1th Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium, 20-21 pp.
8. Austin, R.B. 1994. Plant breeding opportunities. In: Physiology and determination of crop yield. American Society of Agronomy, 567-586 pp..
9. Awan, F.K., M.Y. Khurshid, O. Afzal, M. Ahmed and A.N. Chaudhry. 2014. Agro-morphological evaluation of some exotic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Islamabad, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 46: 259-264.
10. Azizi, F., A. Rezaei and S.A.M. MirmohammadiMaybodi. 2001. Genetic and phenotypic variability and factor analysis for morphological traits in genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources-Water and Soil Science, 5: 127-141 (In Persian).
11. Board, J.E. and B.G. Harville. 1998. Late-planted soybean yield response to reproductive source/sink stress. Crop Science, 38: 763-771. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030024x]
12. Chiorato, A.F., S.A.M. Carbonell, L.L. Benchimo, M.B. Chiavegato, L.A. dos Santos Dias and C.A. Colombo. 2007. Genetic diversity in common bean accessions evaluated by means of morpho-agronomical and RAPD data. ScienciaAgricultura, 64: 256-262. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-90162007000300007]
13. Chiorato, A.F., S.A.M. Carbonell, C.A. Colombo, L.A.S. Dias and M.F. Ito. 2005. Genetic diversity of common beans accessions in the germplasm bank of the InstitutoAgronômico- IAC. Crop Breeding Applied Biotechnology, 5: 1-9. [DOI:10.12702/1984-7033.v05n01a01]
14. Dargahi, H.R., S. Vaezi, M. Omidi and M.J. Aghaei. 2008. An evaluation of the diversity in morphological traits and an identification of the relationships among these traits of white common bean collected in national plant gene bank of Iran. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Science, 39: 155-162 (In Persian).
15. de Albuquerque, A.N., M.A. AparecidoBarelli, L.G. Neves, V.R. Arantes and K.L.M. da Silva. 2011. Evaluation of common bean accesses with multi-category variables. Maringá, Brazilian Acta Scientific Agronomy, 33: 627-632. [DOI:10.4025/actasciagron.v33i4.6944]
16. Denis, J.C. and M.W. Adams. 1978. A factor analysis of plant variables related to yield in dry beans. I: morphological traits. Crop Science, 18: 74-78. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800010020x]
17. Dimova, D. and D. Svetleva. 1992. Inheritance and correlation of some quantitative characters of bean in relation with the enhancement of selection effectiveness. Genetika, 25: 117-123.
18. Egli, D.B. 1998. Seed biology and the yield of grain crops. CAB International, 178 pp.
19. Fageria, N.K. and A.B. Santos. 2008. Yield physiology of dry bean. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31: 983-1004. [DOI:10.1080/01904160802096815]
20. Farshadfar, E. 1997. Breeding methodology. University of Kermanshah, 616 pp.
21. Ghanbari, A.A. 2012. Physiological responses of common bean genotypes under contrasting moisture regimes. PhD Thesis, University of Tabriz, 133 pp.
22. GoncalvesCeolin, A.C., M.C. Goncalves-Vidigal, P. SoaresVidigalFilho, M. ViniciusKvitschalm, A. Gonela and C. Alberto Scapim. 2007. Genetic divergence of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) group Carioca using morpho-agronomic traits by multivariate analysis. Hereditas, 144: 1-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01943.x]
23. Keshavarznia, R., B. MohammadiNargesi and A. Abbasi. 2013. The study of genetic variation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on morphological traits under normal and stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Science, 44: 305-315 (In Persian).
24. Khandani S., G. Mohammadinejad and B. Nakhoda. 2017. Relationships between important agronomic and phonological traits in inbred lines from the crosses Roshan × Sabalan in bread wheat. Journal of Crop Breading, 9: 10-17 (In Persian).
25. Krause, W., R. Rodrigues, L.S.A. Gonçalves, F.V.B. Neto and N.R. Leal. 2009. Genetic divergence in snap bean based on agronomic traits and resistance to bacterial wilt. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 9: 246-252. [DOI:10.12702/1984-7033.v09n03a06]
26. Mavromatis, A.G., I.S. Arvanitoyannis, A.E. Korkovelos, A. Giakountis, V.A. Chatzitheodorou and C.K. Goulas. 2010. Genetic diversity among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Greek landraces and commercial cultivars: nutritional components, RAPD and morphological markers. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Ressearch, 8: 986-994. [DOI:10.5424/sjar/2010084-1245]
27. Molaei, A., H. GhaffariKhaligh and H. Bagheri. 2005. A correlation and path coefficient analysis between seed yield and its components in common bean. 1th Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium, November 20-21. Ferdowsi University, Mashhad,704 pp.
28. Nunez Barrios, A., G. Hoogenboom and D.S. Nesmith. 2005. Drought stress and distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Scientific Agriculture, 62: 18-22. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-90162005000100004]
29. Papa, R., J. Acosta, A. Delgado-Salinas and P. Gepts. 2005. A genome-wide analysis of differentiation between wild and domesticated Phaseolus vulgaris from Mesoamerica. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 111: 1147-1158. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-005-0045-9]
30. Prasad, P.V.V., S.A. Staggenborg and Z. Ristic. 2008. Impacts of drought and/or heat stress on physiological, developmental, growth, and yield processes of crop plants. In: Segoe, S. (ed.). Response of crops to limited water: Understanding and modeling water stress effects on plant growth processes, 301-355 pp. [DOI:10.2134/advagricsystmodel1.c11]
31. RahimiChegeni, A., M.R. Bihamta and M. Khodarahmi. 2017. Evaluation of different characteristics of wheat genotypes under drought stress using multivariate statistical. Journal of Crop Breading, 9: 147-155 (In Persian).
32. RahnamaieTak, A., S. Vaezi, J. Mozafari and A.A. ShahnejatBushehri. 2007. Study on correlation and path analysis for seed yield per plant and its dependent traits in red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Pajouhesh&Sazandegi, 76: 80-88 (In Persian).
33. Rosales-Serna, R., J. Kohashi-Shibata, J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, C. Trejo-Lopez, J. Ortiz-Cereceres and J.D. Kelly. 2004. Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Ressearch, 85: 203-211. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00161-8]
34. Safapour, M., S. Khagani, M. Amirabadi, M. Teymouri and M.K. Bazyan. 2009. Statistical analysis of the effect of water stress on phenological and agronomical traits of white bean genotypes. The New Agicultural Findings, 4: 367-378 (In Persian).
35. SanjeevDeshpand, K., B.R. Patil, P.M. Salimath, J.M. Nidagundi and S. Karthigeyan. 2010. Evaluation of native and collected germplasm for earliness seed traits and resistance to rust, CMV and leaf spot in cowpea [Vignaunguiculata (L.) Walp]. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1: 384-392.
36. Scully, B.T. and D.H. Wallace. 1990. Variation in and relationship of biomass, growth rate, harvest index, and phenology to yield of common bean. Journal of American Society and Horticultural Science, 115: 218-225. [DOI:10.21273/JASHS.115.2.218]
37. Soghani, M., S. Vaezi and S.H. Sabbaghpour. 2010. Study on correlation and path analysis for seed yield and its dependent traits in white bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy and Plant Breeding Journal, 6: 27-36 (In Persian).
38. Teran, H. and S.P. Singh. 2002. Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Science, 42: 64-70. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.6400]
39. Van Schoonhoven, A. and O. Voysest. 1991. Common beans: Research for crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, 980 pp.
40. Vasi, M., J. Gvozdanovi-Varga and J. Ervenski. 2008. Divergence in the dry bean collection by principal component analysis (PCA). Genetika, 40: 23 -30. [DOI:10.2298/GENSR0801023V]
41. Xia, M.Z. 1997. Effect of soil drought during the generative development phase on seed yield and nutrient uptake of faba bean (ViciafabaL.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 48: 447-451. [DOI:10.1071/A96003]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
