Volume 9, Issue 21 (6-2017)                   jcb 2017, 9(21): 115-121 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

(2017). Genetic Evaluation of Root Traits for Doubled Haploid Lines of Barely in Normal and Salt Stress Conditions. jcb. 9(21), 115-121. doi:10.29252/jcb.9.21.115
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-802-en.html
Abstract:   (3301 Views)
To evaluation of genetic parameters of rooting traits in 50 doubled haploid barley lines, a factorial experiment based on CRD was carried out at the agronomy lab of the Zanjan University Analysis of variance showed significant differencesfor all rooting traits:material transfering speed, germination percent, angle, diameter, fresh and dry weight, surface area, cumulative length, the length of the longest root and the hairy root length. The calculated narrow sense heritability was medium for all studied rooting traits except dry root weight (15.11 and 23.40 in normal and stress conditions). Based on the genotypic correlations, it was found that there were positive and highly significant association normal and salt stress conditions, especialy between trait the length of the longest root and traits cumulative root length, root surface and fresh dry root weight. Since, the length of the longest root and cumulative root length and root surface offered as suitable traits for evaluating and selecting the genotypes in breeding programms.
Full-Text [PDF 533 kb]   (1001 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/07/31 | Accepted: 2017/07/31 | Published: 2017/07/31

References
1. Ali, F., B. Sikdar, A.K. Roy and O.I. Joarder. 2005. Correlation and genetic variation of twenty different genotypes of lablab bean, (Lablab perpureus L.), Sweet. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 34: 125-128.
2. Alizadeh, A. 2012. Relationship water and soil and plant. 1th edn. 3th Inc. Mashhad University Jahad publications. Mashhad, Iran, 472 pp (In Persian).
3. Bajji, M., J.M. Kinet and S. Lutts. 2002. Osmotic and ionic effects of NaCl on germination, early seedling growth, and ion content of Atriplexhalimus (Chenopodiaceae). Canadian journal of botany, 80: 297-304. [DOI:10.1139/b02-008]
5. Bchini, H., M.B. Naceur, R. Sayar, H. Khemira and L.B. Kaab‐Bettaeïb. 2010. Genotypic differences in root and shoot growth of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown under different salinity levels. Hereditas, 147: 114-122. [DOI:10.1111/j.1601-5223.2010.02133.x]
7. Borzouei, A., M. Kafi, H. Khazaei and M. Mousavi Shalmani. 2012. Effect of irrigation water salinity on root traits of two salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant wheat cultivars and its relationship with yield in greenhouse. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 2: 95-107 (In Persian).
8. Chen, Z., S. Shabala, N. Mendham, I. Newman, G. Zhang and M. Zhou. 2008. Combining ability of salinity tolerance on the basis of NaCl-induced K flux from roots of barley. Crop Science, 48: 1382-1388. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0557]
10. Dabholkar, A. 1992. Elements of Biometrica Genetics. 1st edn, Ashok Kumar Mittal Ltd. New Delhi, 493 pp.
11. Falconer, D.S. 1983. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Pub., London.
12. Gahoonia, T.S. and N.E. Nielsen. 2004. Root traits as tools for creating phosphorus efficient crop varieties. Plant and Soil, 260: 47-57. [DOI:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030168.53340.bc]
14. Houshmand, S., A. Arzani and S.A. Maibody. 2004. Influences of drought and salt stress on grain quality of durum wheat. Proceedings of the 17th Eucarpia General Congress, pp: 383-386. Tulln, Austria.
15. Kearsey, M.J. 1993. Biometrical genetics in breeding. In M.D. Hayward, N.O. Bosemark, I. Romagosaand M. Cerezo (Eds.), Plant Breeding, pp: 163-183. Springer Netherlands. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-1524-7_12]
17. Kamrava. S., N.A. Babaeian Jelodar and N.A. Bagheri., 2016. Evaluation of Some Soybean Genotypes (Glycine max) under Salt Stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8: 57-63. [DOI:10.29252/jcb.8.18.57]
19. Khan, A.A., S.A. Rao and T. McNeilly. 2003. Assessment of salinity tolerance based upon seedling root growth response functions in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica, 131: 81-89.
20. Khan, F.A., S. Ali, A. Shakeel, A. Saeed and G. Abbas. 2006. Correlation analysis of some quantitative characters in Brassica napus L. Journal of Agriculture Research, 44: 7-14.
21. Khan, I.A., S. Habib, H.A. Sadaqat and M.H.N. Tahir. 2004. Comparative evaluation and analysis of seedling traits for drought tolerance in maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology (Pakistan) 6: 246-251.
22. Manschadi, A.M., G.L. Hammer and J.T. Christopher. 2008. Genotypic variation in seedling root architectural traits and implications for drought adaptation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant and Soil, 303: 115-129. [DOI:10.1007/s11104-007-9492-1]
24. Nakhoda, B., H. Leung, M.S. Mendioro, G. Mohammadi-nejad and A.M. Ismail. 2012. isolation, characterization, and field evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mutants with altered responses to salt stress. Field Crops Research, 127: 191-202. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.004]
26. Ortiz, R. and A. Golmirzaie. 2003. Genetic parameters for agronomic characteristics. early and intermediate breeding populations of true potato seed. Hereditas, 139: 212-216. [DOI:10.1111/j.1601-5223.2003.01734.x]
28. Rengasamy, P. 2010. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Functional Plant Biology, 37: 613-620. [DOI:10.1071/FP09249]
30. Shahin Kaleybar, B., Gh. Ne'matzadeh., S.H.R. hashemy., H. askary and S. Kabirnotaj. 2013. Physiological and Genetic Responses of Halophyte Aeluropus Littoralis to Salinity. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5(12):15-29
31. Soltani, A., M. Gholipoor and E. Zeinali. 2006. Seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of wheat as affected by drought and salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 55: 195-200. [DOI:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.10.012]
33. Steppuhn, H., M.T. Van Genuchten and C. Grieve. 2005. Root-Zone Salinity. Crop Science, 45: 221-232. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.0221]
35. Tahira, W.M., M. Ibrahim and A. Salam. 2006. Inheritance of salt tolerance as measured via root length in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different salinity levels. Journal of Crop Improvement, 16: 131-139. [DOI:10.1300/J411v16n01_09]
37. Tester, M. and R. Davenport. 2003. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany. 91: 503-527. [DOI:10.1093/aob/mcg058]
39. Tsegaye, D., D. Tadesse, D. Yigzaw and S. Getnet. 2012. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in durum wheat germplasm (Triticum durum). Agricultural Research and Reviews, 1: 107-112.
40. Waines, J.G. and B. Ehdaie. 2007. Domestication and crop physiology: roots of green-revolution wheat. Annals of Botany, 100: 991-998. [DOI:10.1093/aob/mcm180]
42. Wittenmayer, L. and W. Merbach. 2005. Plant responses to drought and phosphorus deficiency: contribution of phytohormones in root‐related processes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168: 531-540. [DOI:10.1002/jpln.200520507]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb