Volume 9, Issue 21 (6-2017)                   jcb 2017, 9(21): 27-35 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Abstract:   (3646 Views)
27 different populations of Triticum boeoticum were gathered from west and North West of Iran for their grouping using morphological traits. All populations were assessed in farm based on completely random design with three replications in 1393. The measured traits include stem length with spike, spike length with and without awn, awn length, flag leaf length, the woolly leaves, peduncle length, spikelet length, number of grains per spikelet and 100-grain weight. The result showed that the most diversity were observed in hairy leaf and flag leaf length traits according to the variation coefficient in studied traits. All populations are located in three groups based on cluster analysis. Obtained grouping was not agreed with geographical grouping and showed more diversity into populations gathered from the same province. Based on factor analysis, three factors were recognized that explain 76.65 percent of total variation. The first factor allocation of 30.09 percent of the total variation is mainly explained by the traits of hairy leaf, spike length with awn, awn length, grain number per spikelet and was named as a spike morphology factor. The second factor is explained 23.12 percent of the total variation and named length factor and third factor allocation 23.12 percent of the total variation and name were grain filling factor. Biplot figure based on two first factor, all populations were placed on three groups. The obtained results from factor analysis were conformed the result of cluster analysis and confirmed them. The result indicated that when two first factors legitimized high percent of variation, can be used for grouping.
Full-Text [PDF 712 kb]   (2445 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: اصلاح نباتات، بیومتری
Received: 2017/07/30 | Revised: 2017/08/19 | Accepted: 2017/07/30 | Published: 2017/07/30

References
1. Azimi, M., M. Khodarahmi and M.R. JalalKamali. 2012. Evaluation of some important agronomic characteristics in spring bread wheat genotypes under terminal drought stress and non-stress conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 8: 175-193 (In Persian).
2. Azizian, A., B. Yazdi Samadi, J. Mozafari, A.A. Shahnejat Boshehri and M.R. Naghavi. 2014. Genetic diversity of diploid wheat (Triticum urartu) using morphological traits and RAPD markers. Journal of Plant Products Research, 21: 149-166 (In Persian).
3. Babaei, Z.M.J., M.H. Fotokian and S. Mahmoodi. 2013. Evaluation of genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for morphological traits using multivarite analysis methods. Journal of crop breeding, 5: 85-98 (In Persian).
4. El-Hendawy, S.E., Y. Hu, G.M. Yakout, A.M. Awad, S.E. Hafiz and U. Schmidhalter. 2005. Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters. European journal of agronomy, 22: 243-253. [DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2004.03.002]
5. Faraahani, E. and A. Arzani. 2009. Assessment of genetic diversity in durum wheat genotypes with multivariate statistical analysis. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 1: 51-64 (In Persian).
6. Franco, J., J. Crossa, J. M. Ribaut, J. Bertran, M.L. Warburton and M. Khairallah. 2001. A method for combining molecular markers and phenotypic attributes for classifying plant genotypes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 103: 944-952. [DOI:10.1007/s001220100641]
7. Harlan, J.R. and D. Zohary. 1996. Distribution of wild wheat and barley. Science, 153: 1074-1080. [DOI:10.1126/science.153.3740.1074]
8. Houshmand, S., A. Arzani., S.A.M. Maibody and M. Feizi. 2005. Evaluation of salt-tolerant genotypes of durum wheat derived from in vitro and field experiments. Field Crops Research, 91: 345-354. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.08.004]
9. Huang, X.Q., A. Boerner, M.S. Roeder and M.W. Ganal. 2002. Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 105: 699-107. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-002-0959-4]
10. Jobson, J.D. 1992. Applied multivariate data analysis, Volum П, Categorical and multivariate methods. New York, Springer-Verlag. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4612-0921-8]
11. Kearsey, M.J. and H.S. Pooni. 1996. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. Chapman and Hall, London. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4899-4441-2]
12. Kimber G. and M. Feldman. 1987. Wild Wheat: An Introduction. Special Report, College of Agriculture, University of Missouri-Columbia.
13. Maleki, M., M.R. Naghavi, H. Alizadeh, P. Potki, M. Kazemi, S.M. Pirseyedi and F. Tabatabaei. 2006. Study of genetic variation in wild diploid wheat (Triticum boeoticum) from Iran using AFLP markers. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, 4: 269-274 (In Persian).
14. Maric, S., M. Bede, J. Martincic and V. Guberac-Sjemenarstvo. 1998. Variability of some winter wheat traits from breeding process. Sjemenarstvo, 15: 421-433.
15. Marić, S., S. Bolarić, J. Martinčić, I. Pejić and V. Kozumplik. 2004. Genetic diversity of hexaploid wheat cultivars estimated by RAPD markers, morphological traits and coefficients of parentage. Plant Breeding, 123: 366-369. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.00956.x]
16. Mohammadi, S.A. and B.M. Prasanna. 2003. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop
17. plants-Salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Science, 43: 1235-1248 (In Persian).
18. Moradi Sarab Shelly, A. 2011. Genetic diversity of wild wheat species using morphological traits. Sciences Journal of plant Production, 34: 364-254 (In Persian).
19. Naghavi, M.R. and R. Amirian. 2005. Morphological Characterization of Accessions of Aegilops tauschii. International Journal Agriculture and Biology, 7:392-394 (In Persian).
20. Naghdipoor, A., M. Khodarahmi, A. Porshahbazi and M. Esmaeilzadeh. 2011. Factor analysis for grain yield and other traits in durum wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 7: 84-96 (In Persian).
21. Qualset, C.O. and P.L. Spagnoletti Zeuli. 1987. Geographical diversity for quantitative spike characters in a world collection of durum wheat. Crop Science, 41: 217-235. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700020022x]
22. Romesburg, H.C. 1990. Cluster analysis for researchers. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, Florida.
23. Sears, E.R. 1954. The Aneuploids of Common Wheat. (Anonymous).
24. Shafaoddin, S. and B. Yazdi-Samadi. 1994. Genetic and geographical in Indigenous wheat collection of central Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25: 61-77 (In Persian).
25. SPSS-Inc. 2013. IBM SPSS statistics 22 core system user's guide. USA: SPSS Inc., an IBM Company Headquarters.
26. Stepien, L., V. Mohler, J. Bocianowski and G. Koczyk. 2007. Assessing genetic diversity of Polish wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties using microsatellite markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54: 1499-1506. [DOI:10.1007/s10722-006-9140-2]
27. Taleei, A. and B. Behram-Nejad. 2003. A Study of relationship between yield and its components in landrace populations of wheat from western parts of Iran using multivariate analysis. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 34: 949-959 (In Persian).
28. Van Slageren, M.W. 1994. Wild Wheats: A Monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. and Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Netherlands Wageningen Agricultural University Papers .
29. Welling, M. 2005. Fisher linear discriminant analysis. University of Toronto Publications, Canada.
30. Zaharieva, M., A. Dimov, P. Stankova, J. David and P. Monneveux. 2003. Morphological diversity and potential intrest for wheat improvement of three Aegilops L. species from Bulgaria. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 50: 507-517. [DOI:10.1023/A:1023938621936]
31. Zergani, M., G.A. Ranjbar and S. Ebrahimnezhad. 2015. Molecular assessment of genetic diversity among bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) doubled haploid lines using SSR markers. Journal of crop breeding, 7: 88-95 (In Persian).
32. Zohary, D. and M. Hopf. 2001. Domestication of Plants in the Old World. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.