Volume 10, Issue 28 (12-2018)                   jcb 2018, 10(28): 171-180 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


seed and plant improvement institute (SPII)
Abstract:   (3130 Views)

Development of high yielded varieties is important to balance between production rates and grewing food needs of human population. For genetic analysis of yield and some important traits in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), We conducted line×tester analysis with ten lines and ten testers (three winter parents and seven spring parents). First generation hybrids as well as 20 parents (120 genotypes) were cultivated as a alpha lattice design with two replications under two different conditions (normal and delayed planting date) and days to flowering, flowering duration, plant height, number of primary branchs in plant, thousand seed weight and yield were studied. The results showed that the difference between genotypes is significant and the environment had a different effect on genotypes. High levels of broad sense heritability (from 73.65% for number of primary branches in plant to 87.65% for grain yield) showed that the genetic variance was more than environmental effect. Estimation of less than unit for the mean squares of the general combining ability to the mean squares of thespecific combining ability ratio and low to moderate value of narrow sense heritability (from 29% for plant height to 70% for grain yield) showed that non-additive variance is the major factor in controling of studied traits. The spscific combining ability of hybrids and hetero estimation showed that introduced hybrids in this study could be successfully used in breeding programs and improve the oilseed rape traits. The T9 × L2, T3 × L2, T3 × L9 and T3 × L5 hybrids in normal condition and T3 × L5, T7 × L6, T5 × L10 and T7 × L7 in delayed planting conditions with maximum heterosis for yield were potential hybrids for using in breeding programs for increased yield.
 

Full-Text [PDF 1274 kb]   (808 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/07/16 | Revised: 2019/03/4 | Accepted: 2017/12/2 | Published: 2019/03/2

References
1. Ali, R.M., I.A. Khalil, N.U. Kha, S.U. Khan, M.U. Rehman and G.G. Afridi. 2014. Genetic analysis of yield and yield related attributes in Brassica napus. Pure and Applied Biology, 3(4): 175-187. [DOI:10.19045/bspab.2014.34007]
2. Amiri-Oghan, H., M. Fotokian, F. Javidfar and B. Alizadeh. 2012. Genetic analysis of grain yield, days to flowering and maturity in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) using diallel crosses. International Journal of Plant Production, 3(2): 19-26.
3. Andarkhor, S.A., N. Mastibege and V. Rameeh. 2011. Combining ability of agronomic traits in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) using line×tester analysis. International Journal of Biology, 4(1): 89-95. [DOI:10.5539/ijb.v4n1p89]
4. Angadi, S., H. Cutforth, B. McConkey and Y. Gan. 2003. Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant populations under semiarid conditions. Crop Science, 43(4): 1358-1366. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2003.1358]
5. Asgari, A. and A. Moradie-dalini. 2008. Evaluation, yield components and vegetative characters of rapeseed cultivars in different planting date. Seed and Plant Journal, 23: 419-430.
6. Begna, S.H. and S.V. Angadi. 2016. Effects of Planting Date on Winter Canola Growth and Yield in the Southwestern US. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 7: 201-217. [DOI:10.4236/ajps.2016.71021]
7. Begna, S.H. and S.V. Angadi. 2016. Effects of Planting Date on Winter Canola Growth and Yield in the Southwestern US. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 7(1): 201-217. [DOI:10.4236/ajps.2016.71021]
8. Craufurd, P. and T. Wheeler. 2009. Climate change and the flowering time of annual crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(9): 2529-2539. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erp196]
9. Dehdashti, S., A. Soleimani and B. Majd-Nasiri. 2008. Delayed planting effects on physiological indices of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Journal of Research in Agriculture Science, 4(2): 152-163.
10. Delkhosh, B., A. Shirani Rad, Z. Bitarafan and G. Mousavi nejad. 2012. Drought stress and sowing date effects on yield and some grain traits of rapeseed cultivars. Advances in Environmental Biology, 6(1): 49-55.
11. Ding, G., Z. Zhao, Y. Liao, Y. Hu, L. Shi, Y. Long and F. Xu. 2012. Quantitative trait loci for seed yield and yield-related traits, and their responses to reduced phosphorus supply in Brassica Napus Annals of Botany, 109(4): 747-759. [DOI:10.1093/aob/mcr323]
12. Dong, D.K., J.S. Cao, K. Shi and L.C. Liu. 2007. Overdominance and epistasis are important for the genetic basis of heterosis in Brassica rapa Horticulture Science, 42(5): 1207-1211. [DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.42.5.1207]
13. Farré, I., M. Robertson, G. Walton and S. Asseng. 2002. Simulating phenology and yield response of canola to sowing date in Western Australia using the APSIM model. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(10): 1155-1164. [DOI:10.1071/AR02031]
14. Fu, D., M. Xiao, A. Hayward, Y. Fu, G. Liu, G. Jiang and H. Zhang. 2014. Utilization of crop heterosis: a review. Euphytica, 197(2): 161-173. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-014-1103-7]
15. Gautam, S.C. and M. Chauhan. 2016. Combining ability of plant height and yield components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under salt affected soil using line×tester analysis. Journal of Agri Search, 3(2): 93-100. [DOI:10.21921/jas.v3i2.11267]
16. Gül, M.K., C.Ö. Egesel, F. Kahriman and Ş. Tayyar. 2007. Investigation of some seed quality components in winter rapeseed grown in Çanakkale Province. Akdeniz University Agriculture Faculty Journal, 20: 87-92.
17. Guy, C., F. Kaplan, J. Kopka, J. Selbig and D.K. Hincha. 2008. Metabolomics of temperature stress. Physiologia plantarum, 132(2): 220-235. [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01020.x]
18. Hallauer, A.R., M.J. Carena and J.D. Miranda Filho. 2010. Testers and combining ability, In: Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. pp: 383-423, Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0_8]
19. Hatfield, J.L. and J.H. Prueger. 2015. Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes, 10: 4-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001]
20. Huang, Z., P. Laosuwan, T. Machikowa and Z. Chen. 2010. Combining ability for seed yield and other characters in rapeseed. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 17: 39-47.
21. Iqbal, M., A. Navabi, D.F. Salmon, R.C. Yang, B.M. Murdoch, S.S. Moore and D. Spaner. 2007. Genetic analysis of flowering and maturity time in high latitude spring wheat. Euphytica, 154(1-2): 207-218. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-006-9289-y]
22. Jeena, A. and F. Sheikh. 2003. Genetic divergence analysis in gobhi sarson. Journal of oilseeds research, 20: 210-212.
23. Kang, S.A., F. Saeed and M. Riaz. 2013. Breeding for improving the seed yield and yield contributing traits in Brassica napus L. By using line×tester analysis Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1(3): 111-116.
24. Li, Y., X. Zhang, C. Ma, J. Shen, Q. Chen, T. Wang, T. Fu and J. Tu. 2012. QTL and epistatic analyses of heterosis for seed yield and three yield component traits using molecular markers in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Russian Journal of Genetics, 48(10): 1001-1008. [DOI:10.1134/S1022795412050146]
25. Nassimi, A.W., A. Raziuddin Sardar and A. Naushad. 2006. Study on heterosis in agronomic characters of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using diallel. Journal of Agronomy, 5(3): 505-508. [DOI:10.3923/ja.2006.505.508]
26. Norton, G., P. Bilsborrow and P. Shipway. 1991. Comparative physiology of divergent types of winter rapeseed. Proc. Int. Canola Conf. Saskatoon, Canada.
27. Ozer, H. 2003. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars European Journal of Agronomy, 19(3): 453-463. [DOI:10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00136-3]
28. Pasban Eslam, B. 2011. Study of possibility of delayed planting of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in east Azerbaijan in Iran. Seed and plant production journal, 27(3): 269-284.
29. Patterson, H. and E. Williams. 1976. A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika, 63(1): 83-92. [DOI:10.1093/biomet/63.1.83]
30. Peng, J., D.E. Richards, N.M. Hartley, G.P. Murphy, K.M. Devos, J.E. Flintham, J. Beales, L.J. Fish, A.J. Worland and F. Pelica. 1999. 'Green revolution'genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature, 400(6741): 256-261. [DOI:10.1038/22307]
31. Pritchard, F., H. Eagles, R. Norton, P. Salisbury and M. Nicolas. 2000. Environmental effects on seed composition of Victorian canola. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 40(5): 679-685. [DOI:10.1071/EA99146]
32. Radoev, M., H.C. Becker and W. Ecke. 2008. Genetic analysis of heterosis for yield and yield components in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by quantitative trait locus mapping. Genetics, 179(3): 1547-1558. [DOI:10.1534/genetics.108.089680]
33. Rameeh, V. 2012. Combining ability analysis of plant height and yield components in spring type of rapeseed varieties (Brassica napus L.) using line×tester analysis. International journal of agriculture and forestry, 2(1): 58-62. [DOI:10.5923/j.ijaf.20120201.10]
34. Rameh, V. 2009. Estimation of heritability and heterosis for agronomic traits and oil content in rapeseed spring varieties Journal of Crop Breeding, 1(4): 1-13.
35. Robertson, M., J. Holland and R. Bambach. 2004. Response of canola and indian mustard to sowing date in the grain belt of north-eastern australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44(1): 43-52. [DOI:10.1071/EA02214]
36. Sana, M., A. Ali, M.A. Malik, M.F. Saleem and M. Rafiq. 2003. Comparative yield potential and oil contents of different canola. Pakistan journal of agronomy, 2(1): 1-7. [DOI:10.3923/ja.2003.1.7]
37. Shen, J.-X., T.D. Fu, G.S. Yang, J.X. Tu and C.Z. Ma. 2006. Prediction of heterosis using QTLs for yield traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica, 151(2): 165-171. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-006-9137-0]
38. Shi, J., R. Li, D. Qiu, C. Jiang, Y. Long, C. Morgan, I. Bancroft, J. Zhao and J. Meng. 2009. Unraveling the complex trait of crop yield with quantitative trait loci mapping in Brassica napus. Genetics, 182(3): 851-861. [DOI:10.1534/genetics.109.101642]
39. Shi, J., R. Li, J. Zou, Y. Long and J. Meng. 2011. A dynamic and complex network regulates the heterosis of yield-correlated traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). PLoS One, 6(7): e21645. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0021645]
40. Sincik, M., T.A. Goksoy and M.Z. Turan. 2011. The heterosis and combining ability of diallel crosses of rapeseed inbred lines. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39(2): 242-248. [DOI:10.15835/nbha3926375]
41. Singh, S., V. Kakani, D. Brand, B. Baldwin and K. Reddy. 2008. Assessment of Cold and Heat Tolerance of Winter‐grown Canola (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars by Pollen‐based Parameters Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194(3): 225-236. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00309.x]
42. Troyer, A.F. and E.J. Wellin. 2009. Heterosis decreasing in hybrids: yield test inbreds. Crop Science, 49(6): 1969-1976. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0170]
43. Tuncturk, M. and V. Çiftçi. 2007. Relationships between yield and some yield components in rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera L.) cultivars by using correlation and path analysis. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(1): 81-84.
44. Vanneste, S. and J. Friml. 2009. Auxin: a trigger for change in plant development. Cell, 136(6): 1005-1016. [DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.001]
45. Wang, S., E. Wang, F. Wang and L. Tang. 2012. Phenological development and grain yield of canola as affected by sowing date and climate variation in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Crop and Pasture Science, 63(5): 478-488. [DOI:10.1071/CP11332]
46. Yadav, S.K. 2010. Cold stress tolerance mechanisms in plants: A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 30(3): 515-527. [DOI:10.1051/agro/2009050]
47. Ze-su, H., L. Paisan, M. Thitiporn, C. Ze-hui, D. Wen-dong, T. Rong and L. Dezhen. 2012. Analysis on combining ability for characters of male sterile lines in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Journal of northeast agricultural university, 19(3): 28-37. [DOI:10.1016/S1006-8104(13)60019-7]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.