Volume 10, Issue 27 (11-2018)
jcb 2018, 10(27): 160-170 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Amini F, Dezhsetan S, Rasoulzadeh A. (2018). Evaluation the Effects of Water Stress on Some Phenological, Physiological and Morphological Traits in Rainfed Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Genotypes . jcb. 10(27), 160-170. doi:10.29252/jcb.10.27.160
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-726-en.html
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-726-en.html
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract: (3044 Views)
Drought is one of the most destructive abiotic stresses worldwide that affects growth, development and final yield of crops. Reactions of thirteen rainfed spring 2-row barley genotypes and cultivars of cold areas of Iran to water stress were evaluated based on phenological, physiological and morphological traits. The experiment was carried out as factorial experiment based on a randomized complete blocks design with three replications under three irrigation treatments (normal irrigation and irrigation based on the 60% and 80% of available soil water depletion). The water stress was exerted two weeks before flowering. Results of mean comparisons showed that all the studied traits were reduced with increasing the level of water stress except branching of roots, root length and root length to plant height ratio. Taking all traits together, it is possible to identify two drought tolerant 71938 and 72566-1 genotypes and two Abidar and Dayton/Ranney cultivars which produced the highest yield under normal irrigation and both water stress conditions. Also, 71704 genotype could tolerate the first water stress level but not the second stress level. However, Denmark cultivar didn’t produce favorable yield in normal condition but was comparatively tolerant to both water stress levels. So, after doing competition tests under water stress in actual rainfed conditions in cold-dry and semi-dry land, these genotypes can be recommended for cultivation in these areas, and also can be used for improvement of drought tolerant genotypes in breeding programs.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2017/02/7 | Revised: 2018/12/8 | Accepted: 2017/10/23 | Published: 2018/12/8
Received: 2017/02/7 | Revised: 2018/12/8 | Accepted: 2017/10/23 | Published: 2018/12/8
References
1. Abdoli, M., M. Saeidi, S. Jalali, Honarmand, S. Mansourifar and M.E. Ghobadi. 2013. Evaluation of some physiological and biochemical traits and their relationships with yield and its components in some improved wheat cultivars under post-anthesis water deficit. Journal of environmental stresses in crop sciences, 6(1): 47-63 (In Persian).
2. Abduljaleel, C., P. Manivannan, A. Wahid and R. Panneerselvam. 2009. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological, (11): 100-105.
3. Agrawala, S., M. Barlow, H. Cullen and B. Lyon. 2001. The drought and humanitarian crisis in central and southwest Asia. A climate perspective. IRI Special Report, 24: 1-11.
4. Alipour Karimabad, M., Gh. Ranjbar, S. Khavari Khorasani and N. Babaeian Jelodar. 2014. Evaluation of drought tolerance in maize hybrids (Zea mays L.). Journal of Crop Breeding, 6(14): 41- 53 (In Persian).
5. Anonymous. 2016. Iran Agriculture Stats. Iran ministry of agriculture, 46 pp. (In Persian).
6. Battisti, D.S. and R.L. Naylor. 2009. Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science, 323: 240-244. [DOI:10.1126/science.1164363]
7. Bhardway, R. and G. Singhal. 1981. Effect of water stress on photochemical activity of chloroplasts during greening etiolated barley seedlings. Plant Cell Physiology, 22(2): 155-162.
8. Bonato, E.R. and N.A. Vello. 1999. E6, a dominant gene conditioning early flowering and maturity in soybeans. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22: 1-6. [DOI:10.1590/S1415-47571999000200016]
9. Cerekovic, N., M. Pagter, H.L. Kristensen, H.L. Pedersen, R. Brennan and K.K. Petersen. 2013. Effects of drought stress during flowering of two pot-grown blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 162: 365-373. [DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.026]
10. Chanbdracar, B.L., N. Sechar, S.S. Tuteja and R.S. Tripathi. 1994. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen of growth and yield of summer sesame (Sesamum indicum) Indean. Journal of Agronomy, 39: 701-702.
11. Chu, C., J. Weiner, F.T. Maestre, Y. Wang, Ch. Morris, S. Xiao, J. Yuan, G. Du and G. Wang. 2010. Effects of positive interactions, size symmetry of competition and abiotic stress on self-thinning in simulated plant populations. Annals of Botany, 106(4): 647-652. [DOI:10.1093/aob/mcq145]
12. Ezzat Ahmadi, M., G. Noormohammadi, M. Ghodsi and M. Kafi. 2012. Effect of water stress and source limitation on accumulation and remobilization of photoassimilates in wheat genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 9 (2): 229-241 (In Persian).
13. Farooq, M., S.M.A. Basra, A. Wahid, Z.A. Cheema, M.A. Cheema and A. Khaliq. 2008. Physiological role of exogenously applied glycinebetaine in improving drought tolerance of fine grain aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194(5): 325-333. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00323.x]
14. Fettell, N., P. Bowden, T. McNee and N. Border. 2010. Barley growth and development. Industry and Investment NSW.
15. Fischer, R.A. and R. Maurer. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. Ι. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29: 897-917. [DOI:10.1071/AR9780897]
16. Ganjeali, A., M. Kafi and M. Sabet Teimouri. 2011. Variations of root and shoot physiological indices in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in response to drought stress. Journal of environmental stresses in crop sciences, 3(1): 35-45 (In Persian).
17. Hussain, M., M.A. Malik, M. Farooq, M.Y. Ashraf and M.A. Cheema. 2008. Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycine betaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 193-199. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00305.x]
18. Jaleel, C.A., B. Sankar, P.V. Murali, M. Gomathinayagam, G.M.A. Lakshmanan and R. Panneerselvam. 2008. Water deficit stress effects on reactive oxygen metabolism in Catharanthusroseus L. Impact on ajmalicine accumulation. Colloids Surfaces. Biointerfaces, 62: 105- 111. [DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.09.026]
19. Johnston, A.M. and D.B. Fowler. 1992. Response of no till winter wheat to nitrogen fertilization and drought stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 72: 1075-1089. [DOI:10.4141/cjps92-134]
20. Kanbar, A., M. Toorchi and H.E. Shashidhar. 2009. Relationship between root and yield morphological character in rainfed low land rice (Oryza sativa L.). Cereal Research Communications, 37: 261-268. [DOI:10.1556/CRC.37.2009.2.14]
21. Lu, Q. and J. Zhang. 1998. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll a fluorescence during flag leaf senescence of field-grown wheat plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 149: 164-178.
22. Magloier, N. 2005. The genetics, morphological and physiological evaluation of African cowpea genotypes. Plant Breeding, 12: 81-94.
23. Mohammad, J., M. Naziri, A. Nazir, D. Shah and H. Jamal. 1996. Wheat yield component as affected by low water stress at different growth stage. Sarhad Journal Agriculture, 12: 19-26.
24. Mohseni, M., S. M.M. Mortazavian, H.A. Ramshini and B. Foghi. 2016. Evaluation of bread wheat genotypes under normal and post-anthesis drought stress conditions for agronomic traits. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(18): 16-29 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.8.18.16]
25. Momtazi, F. 2011. Responses of different wheat cultivars to post anthesis drought stress. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 3: 1-17 (In Persian).
26. Moosavi, S.S., S. Jalalifar, M.R. Abdollahi and M. Chaichi. 2013. Evaluation of diversity and heritability of some morphological traits in bread wheat under stress and normal conditions. Journal of Agriculture Knowledge, 9: 37-54 (In Persian).
27. Neumann, P.M. 1995. The role of cell wall adjustment in plant resistance to water deficits. Crop Science, 35: 1258-1266. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500050002x]
28. Reddy, R.K., H.F. Hodges and J.M. Mckinion. 1997. Modeling temperature effect on cotton reproductive growth. In: Evaluation by chlorophyll fluorescence. Crop Science, 881-890. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020032x]
29. Sarani, M., M. Namrudi, S.M. Hashemi and M.M. Raoofi. 2014. The effect of drought stress on chlorophyll content, root growth, glucosinolate and proline in crop plants. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 3(9): 994- 997.
30. Shamsi, K. 2010. The effects of drought stress on yield, relative watercontent, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 3: 1051- 1060.
31. Shekari, F., F. Shekari and E.A. Esfandiari. 2010. Crop Physiology (Translation). University of Maragheh press, Maragheh, Iran, 412 pp (In Persian).
32. Singh, G., H.S. Sekhon and J.S. Kolar. 2005. Pulses. Agrotech publishing academy. Udaipur, India. 329 pp.
33. Siosemardeh, A., A. Ahmadi, K. Poustini and V. Mohammadi. 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research, 98: 222-229. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.001]
34. Sokoto, M.B., and A. Muhammad. 2014. Response of rice varieties to water stress in Sokoto, Sudan Savannah, Nigeria. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 2: 68-74. [DOI:10.4236/jbm.2014.21008]
35. Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2010. Plant Physiology. 5th edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 782 pp.
36. Tkinson, D. 1977. Some observations on the root growth of young apple trees and their uptake of nutrients when grown in herbicide strips in grassed orchards. Plant Soil, 46: 459-471. [DOI:10.1007/BF00010101]
37. Valentovic, P., M. Luxova, L. Kolarovic and O. Gasparikova. 2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil and Environment, 52(4): 186- 191. [DOI:10.17221/3364-PSE]
38. Wasson, A.P., R.A. Richards, R. Chatrath, S.C. Misra, S.V. Sai Prasad, G.J. Rebetzke, J.A. Kirkegaard, J. Christopher and M. Watt. 2012. Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(9): 3485- 3498. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/ers111]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
