Volume 10, Issue 25 (6-2018)                   jcb 2018, 10(25): 91-100 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Urmia University
Abstract:   (3671 Views)

     One of the effective indirect selections methods for improving grain yield and its components is the selection index. In order to develop a suitable selection index for simultaneously increasing yield and its related traits, 100 sunflower inbred lines from different geographical origins were evaluated in randomized complete block designs with three replications at Urmia University in 2015 under normal and salt stress (8 dS/m) conditions. Smith-Hazel and Pesek-Baker indices based on 6 traits including plant high, head diameter, leaf number, one hundred seed weight, head dried weight and grain yield, as well as direct and correlated response of these traits were calculated in each one of salt stress conditions. Correlations between grain yield and selection indices were computed. The highest correlated responses were observed for plant height via seed yield (32.16) and for grain yield via head diameter (14.21) at normal and salt stress conditions, respectively. Head diameter with the highest correlated response for seed yield at normal and salt stress conditions can be considered as a suitable indirect trait for improving seed yield under both conditions. Smith-Hazel’s third indices and Pesek-Bakker’s third indices showed high heritability (0.76, 0.78), genetic correlations (0.87, 0.88) and relative efficiency (0.87, 0.88) and they help to identify the most superior genotypes same to direct selection by grain yield (16, 18) under both conditions. So, selection based on these indices potentially screens the high yielding lines. Based on results, the line ’71’ is introduced as superior line in normal and salt stress conditions.

Full-Text [PDF 517 kb]   (1373 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2016/10/28 | Revised: 2018/07/7 | Accepted: 2017/02/26 | Published: 2018/07/8

References
1. Alexander, W.L., E.L. Smith and C. Dhanasobhan. 1984. A comparison of yield and yield component selection in winter wheat. Euphytica, 33(3): 953-961. [DOI:10.1007/BF00021926]
2. Allakhverdiev, S.I., A. Sakamoto, Y. Nishiyama, M. Inaba and N. Murata. 2000. Ionic and osmotic effects of NaCl-inactivation of photosystems I and II in Synechococcus spp. Journal of Plant Physiology, 123(3): 1047-1056. [DOI:10.1104/pp.123.3.1047]
3. Baker, R. J. 1986. Selection indices in plant breeding. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 218 pp
4. Balouchzaehi, A.B. and G.H. Kiani. 2013. Determination of selection criteria for yield improvement in rice through path analysis. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5(12): 75-84.
5. Biswas, B.K., M. Hasanuzzaman, F.El. Taj, M.S. Alam and M.R. Amin. 2001. Simultaneous selection for fodder and grain yield in sorghum. Journal of Biological Sciences, 1(5): 321-323. [DOI:10.3923/jbs.2001.321.323]
6. Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. (Third edition). Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, 415 pp.
7. Fazlalipour, M., B. Rabiei, H. Samizadeh and H. Rahim Souroush. 2007a. Use of coefficient path analysis for base and optimum selection indices in rice. Journal of Agricultural Science 17(4): 97-112 (In Persian).
8. Fazlalipour, M., B. Rabiei, H.A. Samizadeh Lahijih and H. Rahim Souroush. 2007b. Index selection in an F3 rice population. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Journal of Agriculture), 38-1(2): 385-397 (In Persian).
9. Hashemzehi, M., A. Moradgholi and A. Ghasemi. 2013. Evaluation of responses of mung bean (Vigna radiata) genotypes to drought stress using different stress tolerance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding 5(12): 112-122.
10. Gebre, M.H. and E.N. Lorter. 1996. Genetic response to index selection for grain yield, kernel weight and percent protein in four wheat crosses. Plant Breeding, 115: 459-464. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1996.tb00957.x]
11. Hazel, L. 1943. The genetic basis for constructions selection indices. Genetics, 28: 476-490.
12. Khan, M.A. and S. Gulzar. 2003. Germination responses of Sporobolus ioclados: A saline desert grass. Journal of Arid Environments, 55: 453-464.
13. McNeal, F.H., C.O. Qualset, D.E. Baldrigge and V.R. Stewart. 1978. Selection for yield and yield components in wheat. Crop Science, 18(5): 795-799. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800050027x]
14. Monirifar, H. 2010. Evaluation of selection indices for Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2(1): 84-87. [DOI:10.15835/nsb213563]
15. Munns, R. 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist, 167(3): 645-663. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01487.x]
16. Pešek, J. and R.J. Baker. 1969. Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 49(6): 803-804. [DOI:10.4141/cjps69-137]
17. Rabiei, B., M. Valizadeh, B. Gharayazie and M. Moghaddam. 2004. Evaluation of selection indices for improving rice grain shape. Field Crops Research, 89(2): 359-367. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.02.016]
18. Rezai, A.M. and M. Yousofi Azar. 2008. Comparison of direct and indirect selection methods based on selection indices in wheat lines in drought and non-drought conditions. Journal of Water and Soil Science (Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources), 12(45): 21-32 (In Persian).
19. Rosielle, A.A. and K.J. Frey. 1975. Application of restricted selection indices for grain yield improvement in oats. Crop Science, 15(4): 544-547. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500040028x]
20. Saburi, H., GH. Mohamadinejhad and M. Fazlalipour. 2012. Selection for rice yield improving by using multivariate statistical analysis methods. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 10(1): 150-162 (In Persian).
21. Sabouri, H., A. Biabani, M. Fazlalipour and A. Sabouri. 2011. Determination of best selection indices for facilitating selection in rice. Journal of Plant Production, 17(4): 1-25.
22. Salehi, M. and Gh. Saeedi. 2013. Selection index for seed yield improving in Sesamum indicum. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 10(4): 667-673 (In Persian).
23. Sandhu, B.S., K.L. Khera, S.S. Prihar and B. Singh. 1980. Irrigation needs and yield of rice on a sandy-loam soil as affected by continuous sub-emergence. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 50(6): 492-496.
24. Smith, H.F. 1936. A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenics 7(3): 240-250. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x]
25. Ud-Din, N., B.F. Carver and A.C. Clutter. 1992. Genetic analysis and selection for wheat yield in drought-stressed and irrigated environments. Euphytica, 62(2): 89-96. [DOI:10.1007/BF00037933]
26. Suwantaradon, K., S.A. Eberhart, J.J. Mock, J.C. Owens and W.D. Guthrie. 1975. Index selection for several agronomic traits in the BSSS2 maize population. Crop Science, 15(6): 827-833. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500060025x]
27. Yosaf, M. 1977. The use of selection indices in maize (Zea mays L). In: Muhammed, A. Aksel, R. and Von Borstel, R.C. (Eds.), Genetic Diversity in Plants, Plenum Press, New York, 259 pp. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-2886-5_24]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.