Volume 10, Issue 26 (9-2018)                   jcb 2018, 10(26): 195-206 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
karim koshte R, sabouri H. (2018). Relationship between ISSR and SSR Markers Indicators of Drought Tolerance in Rice Genotypes. jcb. 10(26), 195-206. doi:10.29252/jcb.10.26.195
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-360-en.html
Relationship between ISSR and SSR Markers Indicators of Drought Tolerance in Rice Genotypes
Reza Karim koshte , Hossien Sabouri
Abstract:   (3032 Views)
Breeding of rice for drought tolerance requires proper evaluation and analysis of genetic diversity in breeding populations related to drought tolerance. In order to identify indices for tolerant and sensitive rice genotypes to drought stress, an experiment with 59 genotypes of rice was conducted based of a complete block design with three replications in non-stressed (flooding) and stressed conditions in 2013. Analysis of correlations between the performance of flooding and drought stress tolerance index showed that the indices SSI, STI, MP, GMP, HM and YI as are superior indices for both flooding and drought conditions. Stepwise regression analysis between microsatellite and microsatellite molecular data with indices, a total of 57 and 44, informative markers were identified respectively. The most variations based on microsatellite data on stress tolerance index (STI) was explained with 0.541 by gene loci of RM5424-E, RM462-B, RM549-E, RM8206-C, RM7118-B, RM5424-D, RM3294-B, RM6324-B, RM5780-G and the most variations between microsatellite data based on the performance index (YI) was explained with 0.469 by gene loci of ISSR3-1, ISSR1-6, ISSR2- 8, ISSR9-1, ISSR10-8, ISSR10-10. Results of present study provided a few preliminary data for indirect selection of useful traits using molecular markers.

 
Keywords: ISSR, Rice, Stepwise regression, SSR, Tolerance Indices
Full-Text [PDF 2974 kb]   (1023 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2015/02/10 | Revised: 2018/09/26 | Accepted: 2017/06/12 | Published: 2018/09/26
References
1. Adboli Mndolkani, B., H. Alami and M. Esfahani 2010. Association analysis for morphological traits in peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) using microsatellite markers. Journal of Iran Crop Science, 12: 510-519 (In Persian).
2. Bouman, B.A.M. and T.P. Toung. 2001. Field water management to save water and increaseproductivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agriculture Water Management, 49: 11-30. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00128-1]
3. Bouslama, MS. and W.T. Schapaugh. 1984. Stress Tolerance in soybeans. Ievaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science, 24: 933. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x]
4. Dato Seri, Y.B. 2003. Modernizing the rice farming community to meet social and business needs: The way forward rice conference. 13-16 Oct 2003; Alor, Setar, Kedah, Malaysia, 405 pp.
5. Don, R.H., P.T. Cox, B.J. Wainwright and J.S. Mattick. 1991. Touchdown PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification.Nucleic Acid Research, 19: 4008-4009. [DOI:10.1093/nar/19.14.4008]
6. Ebrahimi, A., M.R. naghvi, M. Sabokdast and A. Moradiy Sarab Shali. 2011. Analysis of microsatellite markers associated with agronomic traits in Iran Barley domesitc. Journal Modern Genetics, 6: 35-43 (In Persian).
7. Fernandez, G.C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetable and other Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. Taiwan, 13-18 August, 257-270 pp.
8. Fischer, R.A. and R. Maurer. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res, 29: 897-912. [DOI:10.1071/AR9780897]
9. Flahty Anbaran, M., A.G. Habashi, M. Esfahani, S.A. Mohammad and B. ghar Yazy .2006. Genetic Diversity and Relationships of Diploid and Tetraploid Annual Alfalfa Using microsatellite markers, Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 10: 42-51 (In Persian).
10. Farshadfr, H., M. zamani Matlabi and H. Imam Joma. 2000. Selection for drought tolerance in chickpea lins. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32: 65-77 )In Persian(.
11. Gavuzzi, P, F. Rizza, M. Palumbo, R.G.Campanile, G.L. Ricciardi and B. Borghi .1997. Evaluation of field andlaboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77: 523-531 [DOI:10.4141/P96-130]
12. Gilevaei, M D., H. Samizadeh and B. Rabiei. 2018. Evaluation of Path Analysis for Yield and Yield Components in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Under Normal and Drought Stress Conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 24(9): 30-39
13. Hormaza, J.I., L. Dollo and V.S. Polito. 1994. Determination of relatedness and geographical movement of Pistacia vera (pistachio; Anacardiaceae) germplasm by RAPD analysis. Economical Botany, 48: 349-358. [DOI:10.1007/BF02862231]
14. Katouzi, M., S. Navabpour, A. Yamchi, S.S. Ramezanpour and H. Sabouri. 2017. Identification of Genes Controlling Seedling Stage Traits in Iranian Rice Recombinant Lines under Drought Stress. Conditions Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(21): 1-9.
15. Mcharo, M., D.R. Labonte, J.H. Oard, S.J. Kays and W.J. Mclauri. 2004. Linking quntitative traits with AFLP markers in sweet potatoes using discriminate analysis, Acta Hort, 637: 285-293. [DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.637.35]
16. Martinez, L., P. Caragnaro, R. Masuekki and J. Rodriguez. 2003. Evaluation of diversity among Argentine grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties using, morphological data and AFLP markers. Journal of Biotechnology, 6: 241-250 [DOI:10.2225/vol6-issue3-fulltext-11]
17. Moghaddam, A. and M.H. Hadizade. 2002. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids and their parental lines to drought using different stress tolerance indices. Plant See, 18: 255-272.
18. Majedi, M.M. and O. Sharfi. 2013. Association analysis for morphological traits in Brassica species using microsatellite markers. Journal Modern Genetics, 9: 179-188 (In Persian).
19. Normand Movid, F.D., M.H. Rostami and M.R. Ghanadha. 2001. Evaluation indicators of drought tolerance in wheat. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32: 795-805 (In Persian).
20. Rosielle, A.A. and Hambelen, J. 1981. Theorical aspect of selection for yield in stress and nonstress environment. Crop Science, 21: 943-946. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x]
21. Rao, L.S., P. Usha Rani, P.S. Deshmukh and S.K. Panguluri. 2007. RAPD and ISSR fingerprinting in cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its wild progenitor Cicer reticulatum Ladizinsky. Genetics Resources and Crop Evolution, 54: 1235-1244. [DOI:10.1007/s10722-006-9104-6]
22. Sharma, B.D. and D.K. Hore. 1993. Multivariate analysis of divergence in upland rice Indian. Journal of Agricultural Science, 63: 515-517.
23. Schnider, K.A., R. Rosales-Serna, F. Ibarra-Perez, B. Cazares-Enriques, J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, P. Ramirez-Allejo, N. Wassimi and J.D. Kelly. 1997. Improving common bean performance under drought stress. Crop Sci, 37: 43-50. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010007x]
24. Shokrpur, M., A. Mohammadi, A. Ziaeebidhendi and A. Javanshir. 2008. Association analysis of morphological markers, AFLP, biochemical and molecular markers in plant milk thistle (Silybum marianum L.). Faculty of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research Quarterly, 24: 292-278 (In Persian).
25. Srividhya, A., L.R. Vemireddy, S. Sridhar, M. Jayaprada, P.V. Ramanarao, A.S. Hariprasad, H.K. Reddy, G. Anuradha and E. Siddiq. 2011. Molecular mapping of QTLs for yield and its components under two water supply conditions in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 14: 45-56. [DOI:10.1007/s12892-010-0023-x]
26. SES. 2002. Standard evaluation system for rice. International Rice Research Institute Manila, Philippines
27. Von Braun, J. and D. Virchow. 1996. Economic evaluation of biotechnology and plant diversity in developing countries. Plant research and development, 43: 77-88.
28. Zaharieva, M., E. Gaulin, M. Havaux, E. Ac evedo and P. Monneveeux. 2001. Drought and heat responces in the wild wheat relative Aegilops geniculata Roth. Crop Science, 41: 1321-1329. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.4141321x]
29. Zheng, J.G., G.J. Ren, X.J. Lu and X.L. Jiang. 2003. Effect of water stress on rice grain yield and quality after heading stage. Chinese J. Rice Sci, 3: 239-243.
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb