1. Ahmadi, K., H. Ebadzadeh, F. Hatami, H. Abd Shah and A. Kazemian. 2021. Agricultural Statistics of the Crop Year, Volume 1: Crops. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Deputy for Planning and Economy, Information and Communication Technology Center. 97 p.
2. Allard, R.W. and A.D. Bradshaw. 1964. Implication of genotype × environmental interaction in applied plant breeding. Crop Science, 5: 503-506. DOI: 10.1007/BF00022654. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00022654]
3. Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype x environment interactions - challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations, FAO. Rome.
4. Bachireddy, V.R., R.JR. Payne, K.L. Chin and M.S. Kang. 1992. Conventional selection versus methods that use genotype × environmental interaction in sweet corn trials. Horticultural sciences, 27: 436-438. [
DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.27.5.436]
5. Barah, B.C., H.P. Binswanger, B.S. Rana and N.G.P. Rao. 1981. The use of risk aversion in plant breeding; concept and application. Euphytica, 30: 451-458. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00034010]
6. Becher, H.C. and J.Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant. Plant Breeding, 101: 1-23. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x]
7. Campbell, C.G. 1997. Grass pea, Lathyrus sativus L (Vol. 18). Bioversity International.
8. Ebdon, J.S. and H.G. Gauch. 2002. Additive main effect and multiplicative Interaction analysis of national turf grass performance trials: Crop Science, 42: 489-496. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.4890]
9. Eberhart, S.A. and W.S. Russel. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x]
10. Eskridge, K.M. 1990. Selection of stable cultivars using a safety-first rule. Crop Science, 30: 369-374. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000020025x]
11. Fernandez, G.C.J. 1991. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction by stability estimates. Horticultural Science, 27: 947-950. [
DOI:10.21273/HORTSCI.26.8.947]
12. Finlay, K.W. and G.M. Wilkinson.1963. The analysis adaptation in the plant breeding programs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 772-745. [
DOI:10.1071/AR9630742]
13. Francis, T.R. and L.W. Kanenberg.1987. Yield stability studies in short- season maize. A descriptive method for genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58: 429-434.
14. Gauch, H.G. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. 1st Ed, Cambridge Univ. Press, London and New York. [
DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511623332]
15. Hill, J. 1975. Genotype-environment interaction, a challenge for plant breeding. Journal of Agricultural Science, (Camb), 85: 477-493. [
DOI:10.1017/S0021859600062365]
16. Kang, M.S. 1991. Modified rank-sum method for selecting high yielding, stable crop genotypes. Cereal Research Communications, 19: 361-364.
17. Kang, M.S. 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal, 85: 754-757. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030042x]
18. Kang, M.S. and D.P. Gorman. 1989. Genotypes × environnements interaction in maize. Agronomy Journal, 81: 662-664. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100040020x]
19. Kang, M.S. and H.N. Pham. 1991. Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agronomy Journal, 83: 161-165. [
DOI:10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300010037x]
20. Kang, M.S. 2004. Breeding: Genotype by Environment Interaction. In: Encyclopedia of Plant and Crop Science, Goodman, R.M. (Ed.). Marcel Dekker, New York, ISBN: 0-4913-3438-6, 218-221 pp. [
DOI:10.1081/E-EPCS-120010525]
21. Khazaei, A., F. Golzardi, M. Shahverdi, L. Nazari, A. Ghasemi, S.A. Tabatabaei, A. Shariati and H. Mokhtarpour. 2022. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction for forage yield of promising forage sorghum lines (Sorghum Bicolor L.) using AMMI model. Journal of Crop Breeding, 14(42):
22. 185 (In Persian).
23. Kempton, R.A. 1984. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interaction. Journal of Agricultural Science, 103: 123-135. [
DOI:10.1017/S0021859600043392]
24. Lin, C.S. and M.R. Binns. 1985. Procedural approach for assessing cultivar × location × data pairwise genotypes/ environments of test cultivars with check. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 65: 1065-1071. [
DOI:10.4141/cjps85-136]
25. Lin, C.S. and M.R. Binns. 1986. Stability analysis. Crop Science, 26: 894-899. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x]
26. Magari, R. and M.S. Kang, 1993. Genotype selection via a new yield stability statistic in maize yield trials. Euphytica, 70: 105-111. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00029647]
27. Martin J. and A. Alberts. 2004. A comparison of statistical methods to describe x environment interaction and yield stability in multilocation Maize trials. Thesis presented in accordance with the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae Agriculture in the Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Sciences (Plant Breeding) at the University of the Free State. University of the Free State Bloemfontein.
28. Matus-Cadiz, M.A., P. Hucl, C.E. Perron and R.T. Tyler. 2003. Genotype × environment interaction for grain color in hard white spring wheat. Crop Science, 43: 219-226. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2003.2190]
29. Nachit, M.M. 1986. Cereal improvement, annual report for 1986. ICARDA, Aleppo- Syria. 40-57pp.
30. Najafi, M.t., M. Dastfal, H. Farzadi, M. Sayahfar and B. Andarzian. 2020. Study of durum wheat yield stability in warm zone of Iran under normal and drought stress. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(35): 80-90 (In Persian). [
DOI:10.52547/jcb.12.35.80]
31. Nassar, R. and M. Huehn. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 43: 45-53. 31- Perkins, J.N. and J.C. Jinks. 1968. Environmental and genotype × environmental component of variability. IV non- linear interactions for multiple inbreed lines. Heredity, 23: 525-535. [
DOI:10.2307/2531947]
32. Plaisted, R. and L.C. Peterson. 1959. A technique for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Potato Journal, 36: 381-385. [
DOI:10.1007/BF02852735]
33. Plaisted, R.L. 1960. A shorter method for evaluating the ability of selection to yield consistently over seasons, American Potato Journal, 37: 166-172. [
DOI:10.1007/BF02855271]
34. Pinthus, J.M. 1973. Estimate of genotype value: a proposed method. Euphytica 22:121-123. [
DOI:10.1007/BF00021563]
35. Shukla, G.H. 1972. Some statistical aspects for partitioning genotype- environment component of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245. [
DOI:10.1038/hdy.1972.87]
36. Thennarasu, K. 1995. On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype - environment interactions and yield stability. Ph. D. Thesis. P.J. School. IARI. New Delhi, India.
37. Vaz Patto, M.C., B. Skiba, E.C.K. Pang, S.J. Ochatt, F. Lambein and D. Rubiales. 2006. Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: from classical breeding to marker assisted selection. Euphytica, 147: 133-147. [
DOI:10.1007/s10681-006-3607-2]
38. Voltas, J., F. van Eeuwijk, E. Igartua, L.F. Garcia Del Moral, J.L. Molina- Cano and I. Romagosa. 2002. Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: basic concepts and methods of analysis. The Haworth Press, NY, 205-241 pp.
39. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigations based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40: 597-605. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x]
40. Yan, W. and L.A. Hunt. 2001. Interpretation of genotype 3 environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Science, 41: 19-25. [
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2001.41119x]
41. Wricke, G. 1962. Uber eine methode zur refassung der okologischen streubretite in feldversuchen, flazenzuecht, 47: 92-96.