دوره 12، شماره 36 - ( زمستان 1399 1399 )                   جلد 12 شماره 36 صفحات 215-205 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

ghasem beiki S, majidian P, rameeh V A, gerami M, Masoudi B. (2020). Management of Sulfur Application some Morphological Properties and Yield of L17 Promising Canola Line. jcb. 12(36), 205-215. doi:10.52547/jcb.12.36.205
URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1168-fa.html
قاسم بیکی ثریا، مجیدیان پرستو، رامئه ولی الله، گرامی مهیار، مسعودی بهرام. مدیریت کاربرد گوگرد بر برخی از خصوصیات مورفولوژیکی و عملکرد لاین امیدبخشL17 کلزا پژوهشنامه اصلاح گیاهان زراعی 1399; 12 (36) :215-205 10.52547/jcb.12.36.205

URL: http://jcb.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1168-fa.html


استادیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مازندران، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ساری، ایران
چکیده:   (1782 مشاهده)
این پژوهش به­ منظور بررسی اثر عنصر گوگرد بر صفات مورفولوژیکی لاین امید بخش L17 کلزا در مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی مازندران-ایستگاه تحقیقات زراعی بایع کلا در قالب طرح بلوک کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در سال 1398- 1397 اجرا گردید. در این تحقیق، صفات مختلف از جمله ارتفاع گیاه، تعداد خورجین در ساقه اصلی، تعداد کل خورجین، تعداد بذر در خورجین، ارتفاع کمباین‌گیر، ارتفاع خورجین، و عملکرد دانه اندازه‌گیری شدند. نتایج به­ دست آمده از تجزیه واریانس نشان داد که اثر تمام تیمارهای گوگرد بر روی صفات مورد بررسی در سطح احتمال یک درصد معنی‌دار شدند. نتایج به ­دست آمده از مقایسه میانگین صفات مورد بررسی بیانگر آن بود که تیمارهای 200 و 300 کیلوگرم بر هکتار گوگرد بیشترین اثر را بر روی صفات فوق‌الذکر نشان دادند. به­ علاوه، نتایج همبستگی نشان داد که عملکرد دانه همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌دار با وزن هزار دانه (0/831)، تعداد کل خورجین (0/672) و تعداد خورجین در ساقه اصلی (0/649) داشت. بنابراین می‌توان از این صفات به ­عنوان معیار انتخاب در برنامه‌های به‌زراعی لاین امید بخش L17 کلزا استفاده نمود.
واژه‌های کلیدی: کلزا، گوگرد، همبستگی، مورفولوژیکی
متن کامل [PDF 837 kb]   (784 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: اصلاح نباتات
دریافت: 1399/7/7 | ویرایش نهایی: 1399/11/20 | پذیرش: 1399/9/18 | انتشار: 1399/11/17

فهرست منابع
1. Abdollahi Hesar, A., O. Sofalian, B. Alizadeh, and A. Asghari, H. Zali. 2020. Evaluation of some autumn canola genotypes based on agronomy traits and SIIG index. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(34): 151-159. [DOI:10.29252/jcb.12.34.151]
2. Ahmad, A., I. Khan, N.A. Anjum, I. Diva, M.Z. Abdin and M. Iqbal. 2005. Effect of timing of sulfur fertilizer application on growth and yield of rapeseed. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 28: 1049-1059. [DOI:10.1081/PLN-200058905]
3. Ahmad, G., A. Jan, M. Arif, M.T. Jan and R.A. Khattak. 2007. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B, 8: 731-737. [DOI:10.1631/jzus.2007.B0731]
4. Awad, N.M., A.A. Abd El-Kader, M. Attia and A.K. Alva. 2011. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and soil inoculation of sulfur-oxidizing or nitrogen-fixing bacteria on onion plant growth and yield. International Journal of Agronomy. [DOI:10.1155/2011/316856]
5. Baybordi, A. 2010. Effects of salinity on yield and component characters in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 2(1): 81-83. [DOI:10.15835/nsb213560]
6. Besharati, H., R. Matlabifard. 2015. Evaluation of the effect of sulfur application and Thiobacillus on some soil chemical characteristics and yield of canola in wheat-canola rotation system. 29: 1688-1698.
7. Doroudian, H.R., H. BesharatiKelayeh, A.R. FallahNosrat Abad, H. Heidary Sharif Abadi, F. Darvish and A. Allahverdi. 2010. Study of absorbable phosphorus changes in lime soils and its impact on corn yield. Agricultural Modern Knowledge (Modern Knowledge of Sustainable Agriculture), 6(18): 27-35.
8. Elferjani, R. and R. Soolanayakanahally. 2018. Canola responses to drought, heat, and combined stress: shared and specific effects on carbon assimilation, seed yield, and oil composition. Frontiers in plant science, 9: 1224. [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2018.01224]
9. FAOSTAT. 2018. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
10. Gohargani, J. and A. Moezzi. 2014. Organic matter, sulfur and Thiobacillus sp. affected yield and yield components of canola (Brassica napus L. var. Hyola-401). International Journal of Biosciences, 5(11): 154-60. [DOI:10.12692/ijb/5.11.154-160]
11. Grant, C.A., G.W. Clayton and A.M. Johnston. 2003. Sulphur fertilizer and tillage effects on canola seed quality in the Black soil zone of western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 83: 745-758. [DOI:10.4141/P02-107]
12. Grant, C.A., S.S. Mahli and R.E. Karamanos. 2012. Sulfur management for rapeseed. Field Crops Res, 128: 119-128. [DOI:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.018]
13. Grant, J.J. and G.J. Loake. 2000. Role of reactive oxygen intermediates and cognate redox signaling in disease resistance. Plant Physiology, 124: 21-29. [DOI:10.1104/pp.124.1.21]
14. Jackson, G.D. 2000. Effects of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient uptake. Agronomy Journal, 92: 644- 649. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2000.924644x]
15. Jamal, A., Y.S. Moon M.Z. Abdin. 2010. Sulphur - A general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Australian Journal of Crop Sciences, 4: 523-529.
16. Khan, A.A. 2017. Canola yield and quality enhanced with sulphur fertilization. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 43(2): 113-119. [DOI:10.3103/S1068367417020100]
17. Keyhanian, A.M., H. Mobaser, M. Samdaliri, S. Bakhshipor and S. Mohammadi. 2012. The effect of seed usage and different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on quantitative and qualitative properties of canola in second cultivation after rice in west of Mazandaran. Crop Physiology Journal, 4(15): 43-57.
18. Ma, B.L., Z. Zheng, J.K. Whalen, C. Caldwell, A. Vanasse, D. Pageau, P. Scott, H. Earl, and D.L. Smith. 2019. Uptake and nutrient balance of nitrogen, sulfur, and boron for optimal canola production in eastern Canada. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 182(2): 252-264. [DOI:10.1002/jpln.201700615]
19. Majidian, M. 2014. Effects of zinc, boron and sulfur on seed oil, yield and activity of some antioxidant enzymes in rapeseed. Journal of Plant Production Research, 21(3): 135-152.
20. Malhi S.S. and K.S. Gill. 2007. Interactive effects of N and S fertilizers on canola yield and seed quality on s-deficient Gray Luvisol soils in northeastern Saskatchewan. Canadian Jouranl of Plant Sciences, 87: 211-222. [DOI:10.4141/P05-218]
21. Malhi, S.S. and K.S. Gill. 2006. Cultivar and fertilizer S rate interaction effects on canola yield, seed quality and S uptake. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86: 91-98. [DOI:10.4141/P05-058]
22. Malhi, S.S., Y. Gan and J.P. Raney. 2007. Yield, seed quality and sulphure uptake of Brassica oilseed crops in response to sulfur fertilization. Agronomy Journal, 99: 570-577. [DOI:10.2134/agronj2006.0269]
23. Mansoori I. 2012. Response of canola to nitrogen and sulfur fertilizer. The International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4: 28-33.
24. Mirzashahi, K., M. Pishdarfaradaneh and F. Nourgholipour. 2010. Effects of different rates of nitrogen and sulfur application on canola yield in north of Khuzestan. Journal of Research in Agricultural Science, 6(2): 107-112.
25. Mostafavirad, M., Z. Tahmasebi Sarvestani, M. Modarres Sanavy and A. Ghalavand. 2011. Evaluation of yield, fatty acids combination and content of micro nutrients in seeds of high yielding rapeseed varieties as affected by different sulfur rates. Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 4(1): 43-60.
26. Rahimiyan Z. 2012. Effect of sulfur and thiobacillus with organic matter on quantitative and qualitative traits of canola. Crop Physiology Journal, 3(12): 19-27.
27. Rameeh, V. 2015. Assessment of combination capability of progressive canola lines according to yield and its component. Seed and Plant Production, 1-31: 667-679.
28. Rameeh, V. 2015. The progressive assessment of canola lines in fields of Mazandaran province. Research Achievement for Improvement Crop Production, 1(2): 13-22.
29. Rameeh, V., M. Niakan and M.H. Mohammadi. 2019. Sulfur effects on sugar content, enzyme activity and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Agronomía Colombiana, 37(3). [DOI:10.15446/agron.colomb.v37n3.71830]
30. Rameeh, V.A. and M.B. Salimi. 2015. Effect of different nitrogen rates on phenology, plant height, yield components and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Oil Plant Production, 2(1): 1-12. [DOI:10.2478/v10129-011-0070-6]
31. Rehman, H.U., Q. Iqbal, M. Farooq, A. Wahid, I. Afzal and S.M.A. Basra. 2013. Sulphur application improves the growth, seed yield and oil quality of canola. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35: 2999-3006. [DOI:10.1007/s11738-013-1331-9]
32. Sakari, A., M.R. Ardakani, K. Khavazi, F. Paknejad and Z. Moslemi. 2012. Effect of Azospiillum lipoferum and Thiobacillus thioparus on quantitative and qualitative characters of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under water deficit conditions. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 11(6): 819-827.
33. Salahi Farahi, M. and F. Seyedi. 2016. The effect of combination of sulfur with Thiobacillus, and zinc on yield, yield components and oil percent of canola (Brassica napus L.) cv RGS003 in Gonbad region. Journal of Oil Plant Production, 2(2): 35-46.
34. Salvagiotti, F. and D.J. Miralles. 2008. Radiation interception, biomass production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 28: 282-290. [DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2007.08.002]
35. Sattar, A., M.A. Cheema, M.A. Wahid, M.F. Saleem and M. Hassan. 2011. Interactive effect of sulphur and nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of canola. Crop Production and Environemnt, 2: 32-37.
36. Schere, W.H. 2001. Sulfur in crop production. European Journal of Agronomy, 14(2): 81-111. [DOI:10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00082-4]
37. Seyed Sharifi, R. 2012. Study of yield, yield attribute and dry matter accumulation of canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars in relation to sulfur fertilizer. The International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 4:409-415.
38. Sharma, D.N., V.K. Khadar, R.A. Sharma and D. Singh. 1991. Effect of different doses and sources of sulphur on the quality and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science, 39: 197-200.
39. Singh, R. and B.S. Sinsinwar. 2006. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, oil content and nutrient uptake of Indian mustard. Agricultural Science, 76(5): 324-332.
40. Oghan, H.A., A.H. Shirani Rad and F. Shariati. 2020. Inheritance of winter oilseed rape fatty acid under normal and late sowing conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(35): 113-124.
41. Varényiová, M., L. Ducsay and P. Ryant. 2017. Sulphur nutrition and its effect on yield and oil content of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(2): 555-562. [DOI:10.11118/actaun201765020555]
42. Wang, J., S. Kaur, N. Cogan, M.P. Dobrowolski, P.A. Salisbury, W.A. Burton, R. Baillie, M. Hand, B.C. Hopkins, J.W. Forster and K.F. Smith. 2009. Assessment of genetic diversity in Australian canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars using SSR markers. Crop and Pasture Science, 60(12): 1193-1201. [DOI:10.1071/CP09165]
43. Zhong, L., C. Hu, Q. Tan, J. Liu and X. Sun. 2011. Effects of sulfur application on sulfur and arsenic absorption by rapeseed in arsenic-contaminated soil. Plant Soil and Environment, 57: 429-434. [DOI:10.17221/224/2011-PSE]

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به پژوهشنامه اصلاح گیاهان زراعی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Crop Breeding

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb